Learn about the latest books, journal articles, and reports of BU social scientists here.
The Center’s mission is to promote the work of Boston University’s social science faculty and our affiliates. If you have or know of someone who has a new publication, please email us at ciss@bu.edu.
|
|
|
Leyla Jafarova
(GRS/Anthropology) Death as the Gateway to “Humanity”: The Humanitarian Paradox of Humanity After Life (Polar, Mar 2026) Jafarova examines how humanitarian management of the dead in the Nagorno–Karabakh conflict constructs deceased soldiers as objects of care, incorporating them into “humanity after life”—a postmortem register of humanitarian concern. |
|
|
|
Christopher Robertson
|
|
Samuel Bazzi (CAS/Economics), Jeremy Menchik
(Pardee/International Relations and Political Science, director CURA: The Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs), Pujan Paudel (ECE), Gianluca Stringhini (ENG), & Clara Martiny (Pardee ’23) Protests and Radicalization in the Digital Age: The Reopen Movement (Cambridge University Press, Apr 2026) Bazzi, Menchick and their co-authors provide the first large-scale inquiry into the ‘Reopen’ protest movement against COVID-19 public health shutdowns and synthesize digital ethnography inside the movement with text analyses of an original data set spanning more than 1.8 million Facebook comments and posts from over 224,000 online activists. |
Amanda Tarullo (CAS/Psychological & Brain Sciences & CISS Affiliate) ‘It all depends on your faith’: Spiritual illnesses and traditional healing in rural Limpopo Province, South Africa (Journal of Biosocial Science, Mar 2026) Tarullo and her colleagues sought to understand local explanatory models for illness and patient experiences with different traditional health practitioners (THPs) among a population of rural women in Limpopo, South Africa. |
Erik Peinert (CAS/Political Science) Strong Intellectual Property and Weak Antitrust: How the End of Vertical Restraints Fissured the US Political Economy (Socio-Economic Review, Mar 2026) Peinert and his co-author show how public and private actors strove to change the interlocked legal regime governing domestic and global intellectual property (IP) rights and antitrust policy to prioritize the value of intangible assets like IP, shifting the distribution of profits among firms and contributing to the ‘fissuring’ of industrial organization. |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |
| Pending |



