
Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Professor of Law
Harry Elwood Warren Scholar
BA, Yale University
JD, Yale University
PhD, Yale University
Biography
Jed Handelsman Shugerman joined BU Law in 2023 after spending a year as a visiting professor. He received his BA, JD, and PhD (History) from Yale. His book, The People’s Courts (Harvard U. Press 2012), traces the rise of judicial elections, judicial review, and the influence of money and parties in American courts. It is based on his dissertation that won the 2009 Cromwell Prize from the American Society for Legal History.
Shugerman teaches Torts, Civil Procedure, Property, Federal Courts, Administrative Law/Legislation and Regulation, and the Clark Legal History Workshop. The Harvard Federalist Society awarded him its Charles Fried Intellectual Diversity Award (2011) for teaching, mentorship, and “for commitment to substantive debate and the free exchange of ideas.”
He is currently working on two books on the history of executive power and prosecution in America. The first is tentatively titled “A Faithful President: The Founders v. the Originalists,” offering a history of the Founding and the presidency that challenges the modernist assumptions on the left and right. This book draws on his articles “Vesting” (Stanford Law Review 2022), “Removal of Context” (Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 2022), a co-authored “Faithful Execution and Article II” (Harvard Law Review 2019 with Andrew Kent and Ethan Leib), “Venality,” (Notre Dame Law Review 2024), “Quasi-Judicial” (Columbia Law Review, forthcoming 2026, with Beau Baumann), “The Indecisions of 1789” (Penn. Law Review 2022), “Presidential Removal as Article I, Not Article II” with former BU colleague Gary Lawson (Northwestern U. L. Rev. 2026), “Major Questions about Presidentialism” with Jodi Short (B.C. Law Rev. 2025), and “The Creation of the Department of Justice,” (Stanford Law Review 2014). The book rebuts the unitary executive theory and “presidentialist” ideologies of administrations of both parties and of Justices across the ideological spectrum. This history supports the traditions of “fiduciary constitutionalism,” independent agencies, and limited presidential power, with surprising twists about the foundations of the modern administrative state (like the “venality of office,” offices-as-property, and the Anglo-American tradition of Treasury independence and “quasi-judicial” offices).
The next book project is “The Prosecutor Politicians: Race, War, and the Rise of Mass Incarceration,” focusing on California Governor Earl Warren, his presidential running mate Thomas Dewey, the Kennedys, World War II and the Cold War, the war on crime, the growth of prosecutorial power, and its emergence as a stepping stone to electoral power for ambitious politicians in the mid-twentieth century. One of the most significant causes of mass incarceration is that American prosecutors doubled their rates of turning arrests into prosecutions in the late twentieth century. This book will explain how prosecutors transformed from low-prestige, marginal figures throughout most of American history into arguably the most powerful officers over Americans’ lives. He published a summary of this argument in the context of Vice President Kamala Harris’s career and campaign in the N.Y. Times in 2024. He has posted an initial book summary and a draft chapter on Earl Warren’s background as tough-on-crime, immigration-crackdown prosecutor and his role in the Japanese internment immediately after Pearl Harbor.
Each of these books was shaped by his experience with clinical death penalty defense work and prisoners’ rights litigation as a law student and a graduate student. He is also a co-author of amicus briefs on an originalist defense of birthright citizenship (based on his article “An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship”), the history of presidential power, the Emoluments Clauses, the Appointments Clause, the First Amendment rights of elected judges, and the due process problems of elected judges in death penalty cases. He wrote a series of essays about Trump investigations and impeachments, and other legal issues: seven guest essays in the New York Times, four in the Washington Post, over forty in Slate, as well as multiple essays in the Atlantic, Politico, Lawfare, and other media.
Shugerman writes about law, history, politics, and sometimes sports on Shugerblog.com. He is a fan of the Red Sox, Celtics, Bruins, and the Alabama Crimson Tide.
- Profile Types
- Faculty, Full-Time Faculty, and Professors & Clinical Instructors
Publications
Scroll left to right to view all publications
-
Beau J. Baumann & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, “Quasi-Judicial”: A History and Tradition, by Beau J. Baumann & Jed H. Shugerman Notice and Comment (2025)
Scholarly Commons -
Amicus in Trump v. Cook: The Fed, Offices as Property, and the Meaning of “Cause”
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, A Historical Case for a Robust But Non-Remedial Seventh Amendment (2025)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Misuse of Ratification-Era Sources by Unitary Executive Theorists 58 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2025)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Major Questions Doctrine, Post-Chevron?: Skidmore, Loper-Bright, and a Good-Faith Emergency Question Doctrine 48 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (2025)
Scholarly Commons -
Brief Amicus Curiae of Professor Jed Hanelsman Shugerman in Support of Respondents
Scholarly Commons -
Amicus in Wilcox v. Trump on Presidential Removal and Unitary Executive Theorists’ Errors
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Ebb, Flow, and Twilight of Presidential Removal 49 Administrative & Regulatory Law News (2024)
Scholarly Commons -
Jodi L. Short & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Major Questions About Presidentialism: Untangling the “Chain of Dependence” Across Administrative Law 65 Boston College Law Review (2024)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Venality: A Strangely Practical History of Unremovable Offices and Limited Executive Power 100 Notre Dame Law Review (2024)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Indecisions of 1789: Inconstant Originalism and Strategic Ambiguity 171 University of Pennsylvania Law School (2023)
Scholarly Commons -
Amicus Brief in SEC v. Jarkesy on Original Public Meaning of Article II & Presidential Removal
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine 2022-2023 Cato Supreme Court Review (2023)
Scholarly Commons -
Alan Z. Rozenshtein & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Rule 37 Constitutional Commentary (2022)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Vesting 74 Stanford Law Review (2022)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Removal of Context: Blackstone, Limited Monarchy, and the Limits of Unitary Originalism 33 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities (2022)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Bi-Partisan Enabling of Presidential Power: A Review of David Driesen's The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (2021) 72 Syracuse Law Review (2022) (book review)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Presidential Removal: The Marbury Problem and the Madison Solutions 89 Fordham Law Review (2021)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The (Joseph) Stories of Newmyer and Cover: Hero Or Tragedy? 52 Connecticut Law Review (2021)
Scholarly Commons -
Amicus Brief in Collins v. Mnuchin on Original Public Meaning of Presidential Removal and the 'Decision of 1789'
Scholarly Commons -
Ethan J. Lieb & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fiduciary Constitutionalism: Implications for Self-Pardons and Non-Delegation 17 Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy (2019)
Scholarly Commons -
Andrew Kent, Ethan J. Leib & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Faithful Execution and Article II 132 Harvard Law Review (2019)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Professionals, Politicos, And Crony Attorneys General: A Historical Sketch Of The U.S. Attorney General As A Case For Structural Independence 87 Fordham Law Review (2019)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman & Gautham Rao, Emoluments, Zones of Interests, and Political Questions: A Cautionary Tale 45 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (2018)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Symposium: Fighting Corruption in American and Abroad: Foreword 84 Fordham Law Review (2015)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance 31 Journal of Law & Politics (2015)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Legitimacy of Administrative Law 50 Tulsa Law Review (2015)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Debra Lyn Bassett, Gregory S. Parks, Dmitry Bam & Rex R. Perschbacher, Caperton's Next Generation: Beyond the Bank, 18 New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy (2015)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Creation of the Department of Justice: Professionalization without Civil Rights or Civil Service 66 Stanford Law Review (2014)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Golden or Bronze Age of Judicial Selection? 100 Iowa Law Review (2014)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review 2011 Revista Forumul Judecatorilor (2011)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Twist of Long Terms: Judicial Elections, Role Fidelity, and American Tort Law 98 Georgetown Law Journal (2010)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, In Defense of Appearances: What Caperton v. Massey Should Have Said 59 DePaul Law Review (2010)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, A Watershed Moment: Reversals of Tort Theory in the Nineteenth Century 2 Journal of Tort Law (2008)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, A Six-Three Rule: Reviving Consensus and Deference on the Supreme Court 37 Georgia Law Review (2003)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Marbury and Judicial Deference: The Shadow of Whittington v. Polk and the Maryland Judiciary Battle 5 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitution (2002)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Louisiana purchase and South Carolina's reopening of the slave trade in 1803 22 Journal of the Early Republic (2002)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Unreasonable Probability of Error 111 Yale Law Journal (2001)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, "Rights Revolutions and Counter-Revolutions" Book Note 13 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities (2001)
Scholarly Commons -
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Floodgates of Strict Liability: Bursting Reservoirs and the Adoption of Fletcher v. Rylands in the Guided Age 110 Yale Law Journal (2000)
Scholarly Commons
In the Media
Scroll left to right to view all in the media posts
-
The Hill February 4, 2026
Trump’s new ammo to toss hush money case conviction
Jed Shugerman is mentioned.
read more -
Reuters January 26, 2026
Supreme Court may leave big questions unresolved on Trump bid to fire Fed’s Lisa Cook
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
The Wall Street Journal January 21, 2026
Supreme Court Balks at Trump’s Push to Control the Fed
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
CT Examiner January 16, 2026
Historic Dispute Over ‘Unitary Executive’ Advances in Trump Era
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
Divided Argument December 3, 2025
Guest Post: A Necessary and Proper Answer to the All-or-Nothing Removal Debate
Jed Shugerman co-authors an opinion.
read more -
Brennan Center for Justice November 18, 2025
Annotated Guide to Historians’ Amicus Briefs in the Slaughter and Cook Removal Cases
Jed Shugerman's work is featured.
read more -
American Enterprise Institute November 5, 2025
The Flaws of Seila Law
Jed Shugerman's work is featured.
read more -
Fox News September 29, 2025
Supreme Court showdown: Trump’s strategy to test limits of his power could spell doom for administrative state
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
CNN September 24, 2025
How the Roberts Court became the Trump Court
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
Mother Jones September 18, 2025
The Supreme Court Greenlit the President’s Political Prosecutions—Even Unlawful Ones
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
Bloomberg August 30, 2025
Trump’s Revenge Summer Heats Up With Fed Ouster, Bolton Raid
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
The Wall Street Journal August 18, 2025
Trump Says He Wants to Get Rid of Mail-In Voting
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
Bloomberg July 17, 2025
What Happens if Trump Fires Fed Chair Jerome Powell?
Jed Shugerman is quoted.
read more -
BU Today June 27, 2025
BU Legal Scholars Assess Supreme Court Ruling Limiting Nationwide Injunctions
Jed Shugerman, Jessica Silbey, and Robert Tsai are quoted.
read more -
Amicus | Slate June 24, 2025
Amicus: This End of Term at SCOTUS Is Unlike Any Other in History
Jed Shugerman is interviewed.
read more - View All Articles
Stories from The Record
Activities & Engagements
No upcoming activities or engagements.