Redrawing Power: The Supreme Court and the Future of Executive Authority
Redrawing Power: The Supreme Court and the Future of Executive Authority, a part of the Democracy Under Pressure series, will feature panelists including: Robert Tsai, professor of law at Boston University; Carl Charles, senior counsel at Lambda Legal; James Bacher, political science professor at Hunter College; and moderated by Roosevelt House LGBTQ Policy Center Director Erin Mayo-Adam.
Heather Rankie to Moderate Panel Discussion at the ABA 74th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting
Across the globe, courts appear to be raising the evidentiary bar for private plaintiffs seeking to establish antitrust liability. Is this a passing trend or a new paradigm? Please join us as we explore cases from both sides of the Atlantic—and beyond! Session Chair/Moderator: Heather Rankie (Zelle LLP) Panelists: Euan Burrows, (White & Case LLP), […]
NYU Law Review Symposium: Charting the Future of Litigation Finance
The NYU Law Review is proud to partner with Suneal Bedi (Kelley School of Business), Maria Glover (Georgetown), Will Marra (Certum Group), Samir Parikh (Wake Forest), the Institute for Corporate Governance and Ethics, and the Center on Civil Justice for our upcoming symposium: Charting the Future of Litigation Finance Litigation finance makes the world go round. The capital financiers provide is […]
KNOW MEANS KNOW: The Shifting Legal Landscape for Sex Education
You may have followed the headlines last year as Executive Orders and Supreme Court rulings affecting sex ed rolled out, but have you kept up with what’s happened since? Join Sapna Khatri, Executive Director of Boston University School of Law’s Program on Reproductive Justice, and Stephanie Davidson, The EducateUS Fund’s Legal Services Coordinator, as they […]
Artificial Intelligence vs. Democracy: How AI Destroys Institutions
Free webinar conversation with Prof. Woodrow Hartzog (Boston University School of Law), hosted by Michael Kolain(RAILS — Robotics & AI Law Society) ahead of We Robot 2026 in Berlin!
8th Annual International Arbitration Conference: Arbitration in an Evolving Geopolitical Environment
The Penn Carey Law International Arbitration Association is excited to invite you to our 8th Annual International Arbitration Conference: Arbitration in an Evolving Geopolitical Environment. Date: Friday, April 3, 2026 Time: 9:00 am – 5:30 pm, followed by a networking reception from 5:30 – 7:30pm Location: Levy Conference Center, Penn Carey Law School Address: 3501 […]
How AI Destroys Institutions
On Monday, 20th of April 2026, DEMCONEX welcomes Professor Woodrow Hartzog for a seminar on “How AI Destroys Institutions”. Civic institutions—the rule of law, universities, and a free press—are the backbone of democratic life. They are the mechanisms through which complex societies encourage cooperation and stability, while also adapting to changing circumstances. The real superpower […]
Portrait of a Legacy: Honoring Barbara Jordan
The program will feature the unveiling of Laurie Munn’s portrait of Barbara Jordan, created as part of her Watergate Portrait series, followed by a discussion of Jordan’s enduring impact with Dr. Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean of Boston University School of Law, and David Marshall LBJ Alum and Chair, 1999 LBJ School Barbara Jordan Forum.
Transitional Justice in the USA Speakers Series – Part VI: Reimagining Repair: The Role of DEI in Racial Redress and Institutional Reform
MODERATORS: Erika George, Associate Dean for Equity, Justice, and Engagement & Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law Nicole Dyszlewski, Assistant Dean for Curricular Innovation and Professor at Roger Williams University School of Law. PANELISTS: Danielle Conway, Dean of Penn State Dickinson Law and the School of International Affairs & Donald J. Farage […]
CLIC for Social Justice: Unethical Patents and Inadvertent Signals
What are the moral obligations of US patent law? Should the USPTO deny patents that rely on data from unethical experiments on human subjects, including those that are too dangerous and those conducted without adequate consent? And if patents can provide potential evidence of legal violations, should regulators require more extensive disclosures that enable them […]