Global Development Policy Center

  • GDP中心中文网站
  • Connect
  • News
  • Events
Menu Search
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Careers
    • Connect
    • Streeten Lectureship
    • Become an Affiliate Faculty Member
  • Research
    • D.A.T.A.
    • Global China
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Human Capital
    • Land Use and Livelihoods
    • Core Faculty Seed Grants
  • Education
    • Economics in Context Initiative (ECI)
    • Journal of Globalization and Development
    • Seeing and Not Seeing Faculty Seminar
    • Summer in the Field
  • Publications
    • on Global China
    • on Global Economic Governance
    • on Human Capital
    • Publications by Year
  • Blog
  • People
    • GDP Center Leadership
    • Research & Staff Teams
    • Alumni Advisory Board
    • Affiliate Faculty Members
  • GDP中心中文网站
  • Connect
  • News
  • Events
Search

China’s Paid-In Capital: Identifying and Analyzing China’s Overseas Development Investment Funds

Jakarta, Indonesia. Photo by Muhammad Alif via Unsplash.

China’s ‘Going Out’ strategy and Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) launched China to be the world’s largest source of cumulative bilateral official development finance. However, in recent years, overseas development finance from China’s policy banks has declined and China’s outward finance has diversified towards other channels. One emerging and under-studied area of China’s overseas economic engagement is special investment funds, or overseas development investment funds (ODIFs), based on their development-oriented mandates and focus on the provision of equity.

A new working paper by Oyintarelado (Tarela) Moses, Laura Gormley and Cecilia Springer tracks and develops a typology for China’s ODIFs, distinguishing them from prior conceptualizations of China’s overseas equity investments and funds. Using a novel dataset of ODIFs, the authors analyze patterns in capitalization, regions and sectors of focus and shareholders. They present case studies of each classification of fund type, focusing on the Silk Road Fund (SDF), the Green Ecological Silk Road Fund (PEF) and the China-UAE Joint Investment Fund (JIF). 

Main findings:
  • The researchers define China’s ODIFs as pools of capital, often established by multiple public and/or private shareholders, which primarily provide equity financing to certain regions and sectors overseas.
  • They classify ODIFs into three fund types: Sovereign development funds (SDFs), private equity funds (PEFs) and joint investment funds (JIFs).
  • China’s ODIFs represent a total of $155 billion in capitalization, accrued between 2007-2019. 
  • This capital represents the amount of paid-in capital available from ODIFs, not disbursements. 
  • This available capital is significant in scale relative to China’s overseas development finance, which totaled $462 billion in loan commitments from China’s policy banks between 2008-2019.

    While capital available via ODIFs does not exceed development finance commitments, it represents a sizable pool of capital and an important and understudied form of China’s overseas economic engagement. The researchers believe that given the novelty of China’s ODIFs and their capital potential, these funds are poised to become increasingly common financial tools in China’s BRI and overseas economic engagement.

    Read the Working Paper Read the Blog 阅读中文版工作论文

    China’s Paid-In Capital: Identifying and Analyzing China’s Overseas Development Investment Funds

    Posted3 years ago on Monday, October 31st, 2022

    Tweets by GDP_Center

    Donate

    Mailing Lists

    Stay on top of all our news and events. Sign up for our newsletters

    Connect on Social

    facebook_circle-128  twitter_circle_color-128  linkedin-circle-icon-128  play-icon-128
    Boston University Global Development Policy Center 53 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215
    • Pardee School of Global Studies