How can faculty inspire students to take a more central role in their learning? Active learning is a term used to describe instructional strategies that promote students’ active participation in knowledge construction processes (Bonwell & Eisen 1991; Prince 2004).
Such strategies may include hands-on activities, brief writing and discussion assignments, problem solving tasks, information gathering and synthesis, question generation, and reflection-based activities, among others. Together, these approaches seek to engage learners’ higher order thinking skills through the production and articulation of knowledge, as opposed to through the passive transmission of facts and ideas.
Active learning tasks are designed to tease out learners’ current understanding, make that understanding explicit, and then create opportunities for learners to integrate new knowledge into their understanding.
Educational Benefits
- Active learning benefits all students, but offers disproportionate benefits for individuals from underrepresented groups (Theobald et al., 2020).
- Active learning contributes to higher exam scores and pass rates across STEM fields (Freeman et al., 2014).
- Interactive courses are more effective in promoting conceptual understanding compared to traditional ones (Hake, 1998).
Despite the above research, some students perceive that they learn less in active learning environments, but effective framing, open conversation, and effective facilitation of activities by the instructor can help counter this misconception (Deslauriers et al. 2019; Tharayil et al., 2018).
In Practice
See how BU professors and instructors are incorporating active learning in their courses!
Boston University Large Course Initiative Examples
In collaboration with several programs in BU’s College of Arts and Sciences, the Institute is engaged in a multi-year initiative to redesign the student experience in large classes that typically have 100 or more students. This initiative provides an opportunity to reimagine and develop new approaches to course redesign, student assessment, classroom teaching techniques and the creation of instructional resources that promote engagement and learning in some of BU’s largest introductory courses.
In this video, Dr. Keying Chen, Lecturer of Chemistry in the College of Arts & Sciences, explains of the Chemistry teaching team implement audience response systems in the classroom to increase student engagement.
Biology 1 & Biology 2
Instruction Team: Kathryn Spilios, Kale Hartmann, Lynette Strickland, Sarah Klionsky
Activity: polling, small group discussions, case study activities, metacognition
The Biology team has integrated in-class polling and small group discussions in all their lectures. These practice questions, quick polls, and small group discussion topics are designed to encourage students to engage more deeply with reading and lecture content. Case study activities help students apply their theoretical knowledge to real world examples and applications.
They have also encouraged students to actively evaluate their learning with quiz RECAP (Review, Evaluate, Correct, Analyze, Plan) sessions—where students reflect on their learning and study strategies along with their responses to quiz questions.
General Chemistry 1
Instruction Team: Binyomin Abrams, Keying Chen, Caroline Muteti
Activity: polling and knowledge checks, think-pair-share, scientist spotlight case studies, discussion-based activities, Wiki-style Q&A platform
The Chemistry team has been using in-class polling for years, but they have continued to develop more in-class questions and knowledge checks designed to have student think more deeply about their chemistry learning. They have deployed a number of different active learning opportunities for students, such as think-pair-share, small group discussions, and case study/scientist spotlight group worksheets. The case study and scientist spotlight worksheets have been developed to link core concepts to real-world applications and scientists and help students practice and understand the relevance of the concepts and procedures learning in homework, lecture, and lab.
They also deploy a wiki-style Q&A and discussion board platform (Piazza) where students can edit collaboratively to answer questions from their peers. This moved some discussion away from just posting a comment or reply for participation credit and instead encourages students to problem solve together to assist their peers.
Basic Statistics and Probability & Applied Statistics
Instruction Team: Emily Stephen, Jonathan Huggins, Yongho Lim
Activity: Quizzes, labs, and mini projects
he Math team has integrated in-class polling, small group discussions, and think-pair-share coding activities into their courses. These all are designed to have students practice, critically evaluate, and create their own code using R for statistical analysis.
In labs, Learning Assistants helped facilitate more active learning opportunities including small group discussions, coding case studies/worksheets, and peer assessment.
BU Active Learning Examples
These select BU examples show how active learning can work in a variety of educational contexts.
- Active Learning in Large Classrooms. Liz Co, Senior Lecturer of Biology in the College of Arts & Sciences, integrates active learning via case studies in her biology classes to better engage students after realizing they struggled with critical thinking exam questions compared to memorization questions.
- “BU Teaching Awards Honor Two Outstanding Educators.” Renato Mancuso, Associate Professor of Computer Science in the College of Arts & Sciences, received the 2023 Gerald and Deanne Gitner Family Award for Innovation in Teaching with Technology for the development and deployment of CodeBuddy in their Fundamentals of Computing Systems course. CodeBuddy helps make in class coding activities more active and participatory.
- Office of the Provost Learning Assistant Program. BU’s Learning Assistant Program defines active learning and showcases how learning assistants be leveraged effectively to help manage more active learning opportunities in the classroom.
Supporting Technology
Whether in-person or online, active learning can be administered in a variety of formats. Here are a few centrally supported technologies that can be leveraged to encourage students to actively engage with course concepts both in and outside of class:
In-class Polling Tools
In-class polling, through TopHat or PointSolutions, can help facilitate in-class interaction and encourage students’ critical engagement with new topics and strategies.
Other polling software, such as PollEverywhere or Mentimeter, could also be used but those would require additional cost in licensing.
Online Discussion Boards
Blackboard’s Discussion Board, Piazza, or Pronto can be leveraged as a community-building tool or as a venue for students to discuss course readings and questions outside of class or office hours.
When effectively utilized, these platforms can offload background knowledge and core concepts from lectures to focus more on employing active learning strategies in the classroom. They can also serve as a venue for deeper student engagement before or after class.
Feedback and Assessment Platforms
BU licenses Adobe Creative Cloud (ACC) for students and faculty wherein instructors can build multimedia assignments (video, audio, visuals, interactive media). This supports multimodal and accessible ways for students to engage with content and express ideas. Adapting class knowledge and readings to new forms of multimedia can encourage students to engage with course content more critically.
Additional Resources
This section provides additional resources organized by discipline for further information.
Engineering
- Marbouti, F., Shafaat, A., Ulas, J. and Diefes-Dux, H.A. (2018), “Relationship Between Time of Class and Student Grades in an Active Learning Course.” Journal of Engineering Education, 107: 468-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20221
- Prince, M. (2004), “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, 93: 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
- Richards, L.G., Gorman, M., Scherer, W.T. and Landel, R.D. (1995), “Promoting Active Learning with Cases and Instructional Modules.” Journal of Engineering Education, 84: 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00193.x
- Wu SPW, Van Veen B, Rau MA. (2020) “How drawing prompts can increase cognitive engagement in an active learning engineering course.” Journal of Engineering Education, 109: 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20354
Chemistry
- Bastyr, C., Johnson, C., Lakhan, R., & Wainman, J. W. (2022). Reducing Chemistry Casualties: Supporting Women Enrolled in General Chemistry I not During their First Term of College with Active Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(9), 3089–3095. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01279
- Kovarik, M. L., Robinson, J. K., & Wenzel, T. J. (2022). “Why Use Active Learning?” In Active Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum (Vol. 1409, pp. 1–12). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1409.ch001
- Wang, Y., Apkarian, N., Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C., Johnson, E., Raker, J. R., & Stains, M. (2024). “A National Snapshot of Introductory Chemistry Instructors and Their Instructional Practices.” Journal of Chemical Education, 101(4), 1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00040
Biology
- Nardi Baroni, L., Gonçalves Picinin, N., Diorio Nastaro, C., Roberto Marana, S., Moreno, A. C. R., & de Cássia Café Ferreira, R. (2026). “Undergraduate interest in vaccines: Insights from the “Adopt a Bacterium” active learning methodology in the post-COVID-19 Period.” Journal of Biological Education, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2026.2628790
- Brady, S. C., & Andersen, E. C. (2021). “An escape-room inspired game for genetics review.” Journal of Biological Education, 55(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1703784
- Heinemann, J. A., & Goldstien, S. (2022). “‘Bums off seats’: Measuring the effects of active learning in an undergraduate molecular biology curriculum.” Journal of Biological Education, 56(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1748687
Writing Studies and College Composition
- Dirk, K. (2010). “I Hope It’s Just Attendance”: What Does Participation Mean to Freshman Composition Students and Instructors? Composition Studies, 38(1), 88–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43501797
- Remler, N. L. (2002). Instructional Note: The More Active the Better: Engaging College English Students with Active Learning Strategies. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 30(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.58680/tetyc20022040
- Paula Rosinski, & Tim Peeples. (2012). Forging Rhetorical Subjects: Problem-Based Learning in the Writing Classroom. Composition Studies, 40(2), 9–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/compstud.40.2.0009
- Roskelly, H. (1988). Active Learning to Active Teaching: A New Direction in Teacher Preparation. English Education, 20(3), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee198814320
Connect with the Institute for Excellence in Teaching & Learning team with questions or to schedule a consultation at excellence@bu.edu.