• Susan Seligson

    Susan Seligson has written for many publications and websites, including the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, the Boston Globe, Yankee, Outside, Redbook, the Times of London, Salon.com, Radar.com, and Nerve.com. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 6 comments on Commonwealth Postpones Comm Ave Deck Replacement

  1. Something is very wrong. The original Commonwealth Avenue superstructure is failing only after 50 years! If it was planned, constructed and maintained properly, it should have lasted 100 years even with the technology that was available post WWII. All three phases of the project failed miserably. Sustainability, nah. We live in a disposable society. Another example of wasted tax dollars! Hopefully the engineers know about the Forth bridge in Scotland. Do it right the first time!

    1. This is exactly the same explanation the MBTA gave for shutting down the massive Quincy Center T parking garage: “It’s over 40 years old, and at the and of its life.” Really? Did they announce that when they built it that it only last 40 years? Of course not as there would have been an uproar.

      MassDOT and the MBTA should look at Boston’s Motor Mart parking garage, built in 1927 and still going strong, as an example of how you design, build, and *maintain* a structure so its useful life can be 100 years or more.
      http://motormartgarage.com/history/

      Even after some years of neglect, the bones were strong enough that it could be repaired and restored. I expect the Motor Mart garage building may still be around in 2127.

    2. So they were going to “terminate the contract for cause and rebidding it” but decided that the same folks who had errors in the design of the steel girders should stay on board because to do so would cause the project delayed beyond the one year. The Walsh Construction Company should not be used. Its about safety not time. Many folks out there would be happy to have such a project. Let’s get the right folks for the job.

  2. According to the project description at MassDot’s web page for this project https://www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/HighlightedProjects/CommonwealthAvenueBridgeReconstruction.aspx the scope of the plan is to simply replace what is already there:
    “The project will replace the entire superstructure of the bridge and incorporates functional and safety improvements, including a revised bike lane layout, into the roadway. The width of the bridge superstructure will be approximately the same as it is today, and its vertical profile will be similar to avoid other impacts.”

    How about pushing the project back another year or two, to actually fix this massively broken interchange? The new deck should include, and completely cover, the area between Carlton and Mountfort streets over I-90, allowing the totally dysfunctional Carlton, Comm Ave, and University Road quagmire to be reconfigured.

    But no, MassDot will spend $90 million to simply replace what is already there, only to propose a ‘reconfiguration’ project that will require another $100-200 million to do the work that should be done now.

    1. LarryO, I couldn’t agree more. It’s like putting a Band-Aid on a cut that needs sutures or staples. I wonder if MassDot consulted with unbiased external experts.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *