• Molly Callahan

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Molly Callahan. A white woman with short, curly brown hair, wearing glasses and a blue sweater, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Molly Callahan began her career at a small, family-owned newspaper where the newsroom housed computers that used floppy disks. Since then, her work has been picked up by the Associated Press and recognized by the Connecticut chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. In 2016, she moved into a communications role at Northeastern University as part of its News@Northeastern reporting team. When she's not writing, Molly can be found rock climbing, biking around the city, or hanging out with her fiancée, Morgan, and their cat, Junie B. Jones. Profile

  • Cydney Scott

    Photojournalist

    cydney scott

    Cydney Scott has been a professional photographer since graduating from the Ohio University VisCom program in 1998. She spent 10 years shooting for newspapers, first in upstate New York, then Palm Beach County, Fla., before moving back to her home city of Boston and joining BU Photography. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 42 comments on Graffiti at BU Hillel Being Investigated as Possible Hate Crime by BUPD, Suffolk County DA

  1. I’m somewhat disappointed by the phrasing of “ An October 7 attack and hostage-taking mission by Hamas” which severely understates the terrorists’ slaughter and debasement of the 1,400 victims and over 200 hostages. Words matter and the choice employed by the author is indicative of minimization of the cold-blooded murder of Jews.

  2. “An October 7 attack and hostage-taking mission by Hamas sparked a heavy military response from Israel that has included missile strikes and a ground invasion of the Palestinian territory of Gaza.”

    You failed to mention that this “”hostage taking mission” killed 1400 Israelis Odd that you would leave that fact out.

    1. The choice of words in this article, as well as diluted statements from the BU administration and many other mass media outposts is what is feeding the constant stream of these hate crimes.

      In this paragraph: “The graffiti incident occurred against the backdrop of heightened global tensions stemming from the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which has left more than 10,000 people dead. An October 7 attack and hostage-taking mission by Hamas sparked a heavy military response from Israel that has included missile strikes and a ground invasion of the Palestinian territory of Gaza.”

      The order of events and complete omission of the Israeli death toll in the heinous terrorist attack on Israel perpetrated by Hamas on October 7, that preceded Israel’s defense response in Gaza is an ultimate example of biased, purposeful and irresponsible reporting by the very own college official news source! Words matter, and this biased and incomplete phrasing by itself represents an example of discriminatory anti-semitism .

    2. and you failed to mention over 10,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel (mostly civilians and 4,000 of them children) and an on going genocide of innocent civilians is happening in response to a terrorist group’s actions. Stop justifying genocide, a life is a life, not all Palestinians represent Hamas.

      1. You are aware Hamas started this with their terror attack, right? Are you aware Hamas used regular civilians as human shields? Are you unable to grasp that the response from Israel was expected by Hamas? If you think Hamas cares for the lives of the average Palestinian, I’ve hit a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn

  3. “Over 10000 people dead”? You mean 10000 Palestinians. Obviously vandalism is against policy, but shame on BU for continuing to obscure the Palestinian genocide.

    Shame on you for continuing to spread the lie that it is a “conflict” or “war” rather than what it is. A genocide.

    1. The deaths of all innocent Palestinians and Israelis is tragic … and falls squarely on the Hamas terrorists (and their supporters) that instigated the conflict and, in contravention of international law and all morality and human decency, run back to hide among civilians in Gaza.

      1. Many people here already expressed what I intended to state, so I’m going to keep it simple. The only hate crime here is the putting up of the sign that says “I stand with Israel,” That is equivalent to a Nazi symbol. That’s a hate crime. BU would be conducting an investigation were it the Nazi symbol. As a BU student, I demand an investigation for a hate crime for the Zionist sign. It’s clearly anti-Palestinian and antisemitism. Zionism is antisemitism. As many Jews of moral consciousness have stated, Zionism is not synonymous with Jews. Zionism is a racist fascist settler colonial regime. Therefore, the tagging of Free Palestine is not a hate crime. It’s a call for freedom. It’s a call to end genocide. Shame on you BU! Shame.

        1. Thank you for your comment. As the story makes clear, the decision to consider this is a “hate crime” is not BU’s decision. That decision is made by the Suffolk County District Attorney, which says that the law on this is very clear: The words that were written, “Free Palestine,” did not constitute a hate crime. But the words being written on a house of worship, that is what potentially violates the law and why this is being investigated. It’s not what the words said — it’s where they were written. — The editors.

        2. You call yourself a BU student with this post? Holy moly you need to learn about what Zionism is and connect with Jewish people more. Separateing Zionism and Jewishness is an excuse to attack Israel.

        3. Dear MH BU student. Let me try to help you understand, simply and clearly. Writing “Free Palestine” over an Israeli flag or “I stand with Israel” sign now, in the aftermath of the heinous terrorist attacks committed on Oct 7 by Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist organization, is equivalent to writing “Long Live Al-Qaeda” over an American flag or “I stand with the USA” weeks after 9/11. Hope this is understandable for a student of this prestigious university.

  4. In regards to your comment that the “war . . . left more than 10,000 people dead,” you have failed to mention that as of November 6, at least 10,022 of the dead were Palestinians, the vast majority of whom were civilians, and over 4,000 of whom were children. This was Israel’s response in the one month following Hamas’ attack; the death toll for Israelis as of November 6 was 1,400, most of whom were killed in the October 7 incursion.

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israeli-forces-cut-off-north-gaza-as-palestinian-death-toll-from-monthlong-war-passes-10000

    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/07/middleeast/palestinian-israeli-deaths-gaza-dg/index.html#:~:text=At%20least%204%2C104%20children%20in,Hamas%20as%20of%20November%206.&text=Note%3A%20Palestinian%20Territories%20include%20Gaza,2023%20is%20not%20yet%20available.

    Your framing of this as a war, an equal conflict rather than the genocide perpetrated by a settler colonialist apartheid regime that it is, as well as your failure to distinguish anti-Zionism from antisemitism, is incredibly disappointing to see.

    1. Hello Audrey,

      Please learn that Zionism is synonymous with Jewishness and the attempt to separate the two is an excuse to attack the state of Israel as well as the Jewish people. Please, I beg for you and the sake of a peaceful future, educate yourself.

      1. Hello J,

        Your patronizing sermon to Audrey, above, is fascinating. So, you state that Zionism is synonymous with Jewishness and any attempt to “separate” the two is an excuse to attack the State of Israel. In doing so you assume “Zionism,” is monolithic. It is not. Zionism in its true form is simply Jewish nationalism. It has evolved over time. Initially, Zionism was simply the movement to establish a homeland for the Jews in the “Promised Land,” or “Palestine,” or whatever you want to call it. However, once that was accomplished, it became a movement to protect the State of Israel and advocate for its growth, which to some, includes the expansion of the State. Taking this a step further, to others within Judaism, Zionism means the purification of the state of israel to one that is of singular belief, religion and values. So, you take it upon yourself to eliminate the possibility that one can be “Jewish,” yet not “Zionist,” in the way that it exists today. I am Jewish. I am not a Zionist (aka I do not believe in the expansion of the State of Israel or the push to “purify” it of Arabs).

        How about this…for the sake of a peaceful future (really??), maybe you should look in the mirror, then sit down and get to know your people better. Peace brother. At the very least, don’t patronize Audrey.

      2. J – In your mind, is there any legitimate way to criticize the political choices and actions of the state of Israel? It would seem, if you treat the state of Israel as synonymous with Judaism and if you view ‘attacks’ on the behavior of the state as the same as attacks on the Jewish people, then you have decided to elevate Israel as being beyond reproach no matter what it does.

  5. This is a ridiculous attempt to brand protest against a specific nation state as bigotry against a whole group. There is a real rise in antisemitism and yet focus and resources are placed on what is clearly a politically motivated protest. The graffiti artist could have easily placed the writing anywhere but chose specifically a sign that stated a political opinion that mentions Israel. To act like a protest against Israel is a hate crime is not only dangerous but gives cover to a fascist regime that is actively and credibly being accused of heinous war crimes by the UN and other organizations around the world.

    Protest against Israel is not antisemitic, we can and should have a discussion about how and when these sorts of protest should take place since there have been genuine incidents of antisemitic actions being taken in the name of Palestinian liberation. Israel has time and time again has tried making itself synonymous with Jewish people in order to label any critique as antisemitic; we cannot act like any criticism of a secular democracy led by an elected class is antisemitic, that is ridiculous, dangerous, and frankly, as someone whose grandparents were forced to flee Palestine due to Israeli settlers, it is insulting.

    1. 100% agree with Kael M’s comment. I don’t see how this is a hate crime. A Nazi symbol, yes. Freedom for a population who in many people’s view has been oppressed for decades, not so much.

    2. Kael, thank you for your comment. As a Jewish student and descendant of Holocaust victims, I second your words.

      I also emphasize that if the University truly cares about keeping campus safe from “violence, threats directed at individuals, or acts that constitute hate crimes,” they must do so for ALL students, of ALL identities. I fail to see this level of reaction toward BU students who are being doxxed, harassed, and assaulted for being Muslim, BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, disabled, or other non-Jewish marginalized identities.

      BU administration’s cherry-picking what is and is not a hate crime is disappointing and harmful. Do better!

      1. Thank you for your solidarity and your words. We will ensure everyone’s dignity and protections one day and you are absolutely correct in your statements about how BU cherrypicks.

    3. Your response is a ridiculous and dangerous attempt to brand an illegal and targeted activity against the main visibly Jewish organization on campus as merely political criticism.

      1. You completely fail to acknowledge the points I made. I do not claim to know what’s happening in the mind of the graffiti artist or their intentions but based on the evidence it seems unlikely this was specifically due to the fact that Hillel is a Jewish student life org. The graffiti could have been placed literally anywhere, somewhere more prominent or on a star of David, if that were the case I could see an argument for the action to be seen as antisemitic since it would look like the graffiti was targeting specifically Jewish identity and equating it with support for Israel’s genocide. But this was overlaid on a poster that says “we stand with Israel”. So this seems like it is about support of Israel, you equating an attack against support for Israel as an attack against Jewish Identity is dangerous and disingenuous.

      2. If the Hillel were a religious entity, then you could perhaps think that the flag was painted because of religious targeting. But it’s plain for all to see in the image that the Hillel has branded itself as a political organisation with ‘We stand with Israel’ in its window. That’s a political statement. Not a religous statement. So, if someone who believes Israel is committing war crimes voices their displeasure in the form of graffiti expressing their political views, how is that hate speech? It is extraordinary the extent to which Zionist supporters will reduce everything to anti-semitism. I am Jewish. I find it distasteful that others use their Jewishness to advance vilification of anone who disagrees with Zionism.

    4. Not all protests against Israel are antisemitic.

      However choosing to target a space specifically dedicated to Jewish students with this type of message is, notwithstanding the fact that these desecrations are understandably frightening to Jewish community members on campus. And doing so by vandalizing ok private property is illegal.

  6. As I reread the article it infuriated me. Describing October 7th as a “mission” is unacceptable. Minimizing the murders and degradation of 1,400 people is appalling. Adding “heavy” in describing the completely justified Israeli response is a complete demonstration of the writer’s bias. BU needs to be better than this.

    1. Completely justified? You mean bombing refugee camps, conveys of evacuees, and hospitals is justified? You mean the murder of tens of thousands of Palestinians is justified? Palestinians, my ancestors, were living on that land for thousands of years alongside Jewish and Christian neighbors. As soon as Britain got their hands on it and in turn allowed colonization the genocide of my ancestors began. There is nothing justified about this and I hope you see that.

  7. There are Magen David’s not 5 feet away carved into the stonework of the same building. If someone had vandalized those, that would be antisemitic and could be a hate crime.

    But graffiti on an Israeli flag sign that says “We Stand with Israel”? That is definitionally free speech. Israeli is not a protected class under hate speech laws. Attempting to call this act a hate crime is offensive to Jews everywhere who are experiencing a real increase in antisemitism.

    Additionally, BU Hillel has only cares about Jewish students who agree with them politically as shown by their refusal to protect anti-genocide Jewish students from doxing and harassment.

  8. Yeah everything about the this war is absolutely [expletive], and both sides are cartoonishly evil, but that doesn’t mean you graffiti a BU building ffs. You can lodge a complaint or even talk to them directly, but graffitiing the outside is cowardly and disgusting because now BU has to spend resources to clean it up and investigate, and more importantly the students and faculty who work there may now feel threatened because for them it could almost be a second home that has now been desecrated. That all said, going so far as to call this a hate crime seems like a stretch, but given that there are worship services on site I guess it does enter a grey area. I will say, I have been upset with BU Hillel’s blank check support for Israel given the ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity that Israel is committing against Palestinians in the name of combatting Hamas. They should clarify that they stand with the civilians of Israel, not the government. These are human tragedies, and we should take a human-level approach to our reaction and support.

  9. The sentence “The graffiti incident occurred against the backdrop of heightened global tensions stemming from the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which has left more than 10,000 people dead” is both highly disingenuous and misleading. That is less than the death count of Gazan civilians alone in the past 33 days. This entire article is worded to seem as though Israel and the Palestinian people are on equal footing in what is, in all actuality, an active genocide of the Palestinian people. Moreover, the treatment of an obviously politically-based protest being labeled as anti-semitism is a complete non-sequitur that labels those who stand against genocide and settler-colonial violence as bigots, instead of those supporting the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

  10. Baffling to me that you would choose to categorize Hamas as a “militant group” rather than a terrorist organization, as it has been deemed worldwide. The acts committed on October 7th, the slaughter, torture, r*pe and kidnapping of civilians isn’t a mere act of war – it is a crime against our common humanity.

  11. If someone spray paints “Free Palestine” across the window of BU Hillel, it is vandalism, yes. Moreover, it is hate speech BECAUSE it is spray painted on the window of BU Hillel, in fact. If someone wants to walk around campus with a poster saying “Free Palestine,” that is free speech. It would be great if activists concerned with Palestinian rights could have protests/info sessions that actually focus on Palestine–its history, people, culture, political movements, how they would like to be supported–rather than on Israel.

    When people throw around words like “genocide” when referencing the plight of the Palestinians, it is obvious that they are missing some crucial information about this conflict, about Israel, about the Occupied Territories, about Palestinian history, and, frankly, about the definition of genocide. BU offers lots of great classes on the Conflict, on Arab nationalism (including pan-Arabism and Palestinian nationalism), Israeli history and culture, Hebrew and Arabic, and even on genocide and human rights…I could go on. If this is a topic you care about, take a class and educate yourself. Then you can really help the causes you care about.

    1. How are we supposed to focus on anything other than Israel when they are actively an apartheid regime that treats Palestinians as nothing? The current defense minister of Israel has referred to Palestinians as human animals, Palestinians make up a significant portion of the population in Israel and yet they have practically no power and the land they were given through accords and international agreements has been continually violated by Israeli terrorists. Don’t act like Israel is some innocent child when it is a nation state guilty of heinous acts.

  12. The amount of ignorance I’m seeing on here from some students is actually scary to me as a Jewish person. Those failing to condemn Hamas and continue to bash Israel as a Zionist, Jewish state are using this conflict as an excuse to continue to attack Israel. They take pleasure in what Hamas has done. Shocking to see from people who normally defend others.

  13. In order for the determination to be made as to whether this is hate speech under Massachusetts law, the state is required to demonstrate the the act of vandalism targeted the BU Hillel building because its membership is Jewish (akin to a synagogue), rather than because of the sign saying “We Stand with Israel.” Even so, the statement “Free Palestine” itself is not antisemitic. If the person is/people are ultimately caught and prosecuted, they should not only lawyer up, but also examine themselves for what motivated them to do this. What were they hoping to accomplish?

    The sign itself is problematic and it should not be difficult to understand why someone would want to express frustration or retaliate against it. Does it warrant vandalism? It does not. It can also be true, though, that, at best, the sign is tone deaf, insensitive, and one-sided. It is one thing to say “We stand with the kidnapped and their loved ones” or “We stand against terrorism” or “We stand against antisemitism.” But, to express “We Stand with Israel” despite the actions of Bibi and Ben-Gvir and all other far-right colonialist actors means to spit in the face of the Palestinians who have long been harassed and oppressed by Israel’s military and political apparatus. Please study the work of Michael Brooks, Norman Finkelstein, and Noam Chomsky (all Jewish by the way) on this issue. I am with Rabbi Alissa Wise: Ceasefire now!

  14. This story ran on November 9th – the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht. A little paint – no broken glass. Nothing to see folks. Move on. This is the same institution that Elie Wiesel taught at, yes?

  15. Kudos to BU Today for bringing this situation to light. Awareness is exceptionally important.

    At the same time — where on earth is BU’s administration on this and overall tensions? Wow.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *