Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 2 comments on POV: Who Is Forgotten in Our Discussion of Abortion?

  1. I think you’ve completely missed the point of the new TX law …

    Yes, they should perhaps have used more ‘gender’ appropriate language, but the reality point of that law was to set a marker for ‘when life begins’ vs the whole social discussion of who might be pregnant, etc

    When NY legislators stood and clapped to celebrate abortion anytime, anywhere, on-demand – and even post birth (several other states went this barbaric way too), the sea completely changed … it was no longer a discussion of ‘safe, legal, and rare’ and/or ‘a woman’s right to choose’ but rather it became a discussion on infanticide and everything turned upside down .. the more casual supporter of ‘choice’ has been pushed to much more deeply evaluate their individual position – and MANY have gone hard towards Pro-Life (from Pro-Choice) …

    But the real debate will center on how the courts FINALLY decide ‘when does life begin’ .. and if you’re being honest and impartial, you have to give TX legislators much credit for picking a point like a ‘noticeable heartbeat’ vs something more nebulous like ‘at conception’ .. but in EITHER instance, FAR MORE DEFENSIBLE than ‘post birth’ ..

    Roe v Wade IS a landmark case on abortion rights .. but MUCH less so on the baseline question of ‘life’ and when it begins, as much as it is on ‘states rights’ to control access

    This is going to be a fascinating matter to follow through the courts .. and have no fear, I’m sure that ‘gender’ will also be addressed.

    1. Hi there! Co author here. We have not missed the point of the implications of the TX law. I’m willing to assume you’ve read this in good faith. This particular article is in direct response to the original BU today article, and in general discusses the fact that abortion restrictions are an intersectional feminist issue that impact trans men and nonbinary people, not only women.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *