Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 3 comments on POV: Cheering a More Inclusive Olympic Games

  1. Nope, nope, nope! As a father of 3 girls in athletics, I cannot support men competing against women regardless of their “testosterone” levels which thankfully this article proves as non-defining of athletic ability.

    Male athletes are physically superior to female athletes due to their genetics. These men are taking spots from hard working women in sports essentially crushing the women’s equality movement. Don’t get me wrong, if any of these men came to me for a job, I am completely open to hiring them as mental ability is not as discriminatory as physical ability. But in athletics, men competing with women is no competition at all.

  2. Aaaaaaand, NOBODY is watching these Olympics .. when it’s all about social justice, it quickly loses entertainment value .. like the NBA, MLB, and ALL the awards shows, when you go full ‘woke’ you’ll ultimately go ‘broke’ .. these Olympics will set records for ‘nobody cares’.

  3. How would the author explain the apparently stark differences between male and female athletes (e.g., body-building, track, soccer, etc.). Is the implication that women athletes are somehow less dedicated to these sports than their male counterparts? That seems preposterous.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *