Boston University Law Review Online
Boston University Law Review Online, formerly known as the Boston University Law Review Annex, is Boston University Law Review’s online publication featuring symposia and essays, including invited responses, perspectives and student notes.
For Online Symposia only, please visit this page.
For Online Essays (non-symposia) only, please visit this page.
All Online Articles
Doing Legal Scholarship Bet-ter
Ari Ezra Waldman
Online Symposium: Ryan Calo’s Law and Technology: A Methodical Approach
106 B.U. L. Rev. Online 31 (2026)
Self-Definition in Legal Scholarship
Jessica M. Eaglin
Online Symposium: Ryan Calo’s Law and Technology: A Methodical Approach
106 B.U. L. Rev. Online 35 (2026)
Locating Meaning in the Methods of Law & Technology
Kristen Thomasen
Online Symposium: Ryan Calo’s Law and Technology: A Methodical Approach
106 B.U. Law Review Online 39 (2026)
On Predicting and Stopping Dystopia
Evan Selinger & Woodrow Hartzog
Online Symposium: Ryan Calo’s Law and Technology: A Methodical Approach
106 B.U. L. Rev. Online 45 (2026)
The Morality of Law and Technology
Ryan Calo
Online Symposium: Ryan Calo’s Law and Technology: A Methodical Approach
106 B.U. Law Review Online 53 (2026)
Self-Determination and Default Procedures
Pamela K. Bookman
Online Symposium: Lauren Sudeall’s Self-Determination and Self-Represented Litigants
106 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2026).
Social and Psychological Barriers to Self-Determination and Access to Justice
Kathryne M. Young
Online Symposium: Lauren Sudeall’s Self-Determination and Self-Represented Litigants
106 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2026).
Share the Power of Questions: A Strategy for Overcoming Obstacles to Self-Determination in the Legal System
Naomi Campbell & Keila Perez
Online Symposium: Lauren Sudeall’s Self-Determination and Self-Represented Litigants
106 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2026).
Critical Legal Empowerment: Justice Work as Self-Determination for Self-Represented Litigants
Gabriela Elizondo-Craig, Stacy Rupprecht Jane & Hayley Cousin
Online Symposium: Lauren Sudeall’s Self-Determination and Self-Represented Litigants
106 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2026).
Marital Privilege Symposium Response
Serena Mayeri
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 87 (2025).
Institutional Challenges in an Authoritarian Age
Katie Eyer
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 79 (2025).
Formal Victories and Roads Not Taken: Excavating Departures and Throughlines in Challenges to the Place of Marriage
Linda C. McClain
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 69 (2025).
The Historical Functions of Marital Privilege: A Distributive Analysis of Family Law
Deborah Dinner
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 63 (2025).
The Racial History of Marital Privilege
Jessica Dixon Weaver
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 59 (2025).
The Benefits of Marriage
Cary Franklin
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 51 (2025).
The Formal Limit on Privatizing Support
Albertina Antognini
Online Symposium: Serena Mayeri’s Marital Privilege
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 43 (2025).
Innovation and the Limits of Predictive Governance
Laura Pedraza-Fariña
Invited Response: Laura Pedraza-Fariña, Innovation and the Limits of Predictive Governance
105 B.U. L. Rev. Online 27 (2025).
Nanaboozhoo and Derrick Bell Go for a Walk
Matthew L. M. Fletcher
Online Symposium: Carla D. Pratt’s Indianness as Property (2025).
105 B.U. Law Review Online 17 (2025).
Rejecting the Racialization of Indianness
Andrea J. Martin
Online Symposium: Carla D. Pratt’s Indianness as Property (2025).
105 B.U. Law Review Online 1 (2025).