• Mitch Susswein (CAS’24)

    Mitch Susswein (CAS’24) Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 18 comments on POV: The Rise of Antisemitism Is Real, and Should Not Be Ignored

  1. Alumni

    I agree the campus and university leaders can do much better to support and help Jewish students on campus. It is now known by a few studies that on college campuses about 7 in 10 jewish students are experiencing antisemitism.

    Administration leaders also need to support the senior class much better. Your class, this senior class came onto campus four years ago while the pandemic was in full force. They were more socially isolated, had mostly virtual classes and dorm life was not normal. This senior class has rallied and are a special group but have already had significant stress in college. They deserve to graduate feeling good about the campus environment.

    University leaders need to up the game. They are responsible to create a safe and supporting campus.

  2. Conflating anti-Zionism with anti-semitism does a disservice to the people ACTUALLY being oppressed for being Jewish. Shame on you. “Free Palestine” written over a “We stand with Israel” banner is nowhere near a swastika or hate crime

  3. Well articulated. I commend your courage to share your point of view which is shared by many other Jewish students that I personally know at BU and other universities. It’s starts at the top, and if an administration is quick to denounce any forms of discrimination and antisemitism, including hate speech, the Jewish students would feel more secure and haters would feel less inclined to jump on the band wagon that has become sadly “fashionable”.

  4. This was a compelling POV. Thanks for sharing, Mitch.

    The only point I gently disagree with is the value you and other students put on statements coming from the BU administration, and civic/corporate institutions at large.

    Having received many of these official statements from President Brown and now Freeman over the years in response to various socio-political issues, the end result largely seems to be the same: discontent among many stakeholders at the fervor (or lack thereof) of the message; disappointment with the words chosen; claims of bias in favor of one group.

    You expressed disappointment at the timeliness of President Freeman’s response after 10/7. You’ll likely recall that many Palestinian students and sympathizers were equally disappointed in the content of that letter, as they perceived it to be too pro-Israel.

    These statements are necessary obligations in today’s institutions that, more often than not, seem to disappoint and inflame a segment of the community more than catalyze healing and understanding. It was revealing that both groups took such strong issue with BU’s official statement. Could any message have truly connected with all parties involved? I sincerely don’t know, but it leads me deeper into thinking these statements are a lose-lose proposition and are having the opposite effect than what’s desired.

    You mentioned the existence of the Center for Antiracist Research as a reason for BU to be more outspoken against antisemitism. It’s a valid point, but did you know that to many pundits, commentators, and individuals beyond the BU bubble, this center is not a point of pride, but an example of radical progressives ruining education and brainwashing your generation? Even when attempting to remedy an issue like racism with scholarship, the university is angering some group or population. This is inevitable in an organization with 10k employees and 30k students. It’s virtually impossible to please everyone.

    What I can say in solidarity with your argument is that those peers and classmates who are kicking you off club boards, refusing to speak with you, and calling you names because you are Jewish should be ashamed of themselves, especially in a community that prides itself on being well-educated and inclusive. I am embarrassed for them!

    If you read this, thanks for your patience. I wish you and your family as peaceful a holiday and new year as possible in spite of the circumstances, and I thank you for sharing your POV with our community.

    1. The BU administration opened the door to criticism when it chose upon which political issues it would comment and on which (frankly, just this one) it would stay (mostly) silent.

      It is fine and appropriate for the university president to refuse to comment on all political matters, and let the university community civilly discuss its differences. It is neither fine nor appropriate for the university president to comment on all matters except this one.

      1. I disagree with your assessment that the university president has commented on all matters except this one and remained mostly silent.

        He put out a formal statement within days of the 10/7 attacks (see Doug Most’s above comment), and discussed the issue in front of a live audience at the most recent Management Conference.

        If you disagree with what the president has said or written, that is fair, but it’s inaccurate to claim he, and therefore the university, has been silent. I would hope that as a university community, we could at least agree on the facts and not fall prey to the “alternative facts” trend that sadly exists in our politics.

  5. BU needs to do more than distance themselves from the controversy. Boston University must actively support ethnic minorities, particularly those that are under visible attack such as the Jewish members of the university community.

    America in general, and Boston University in particular, must be a safe place. What ever happened to liberal values?

    Shame on those who call for genocide, on those who disguise it, on those who defend them, on those who can only issue carefully worded statements, . . . and those who remain silent.

  6. To provide context, I am a Jew by ethnicity though not by religion. I certainly agree that there is anti-semitism in this country, but we do not have an agreement on what constitutes anti-semitism. Writing “Free Palestine” on a window of Hillel is not anti-semitism in my view, but rather a political statement. Israel and many of its supporters have for decades tried to conflate criticism of Israel with anti-semitism, and the same thing is happening now.

    The writer of the essay may find it anti-semitic that many are focusing more on what is happening to the Palestinians, but I find it very disturbing that the writer’s only concern is what is happening to Israelis in the face of the enormous and deliberate destruction in Gaza. The fact that many people are more focused on the plight of the Palestinians may make for an uncomfortable situation, but it is not anti-semitic.

    Israel has not been an innocent actor over the past decades. Expansion of the settlements has been a long-term policy and is aimed at making it impossible for Palestinians to have a state of their own. And perhaps most cynical of all has been Israel’s strategy of bolstering Hamas’ control in Gaza so no progress can be made toward a two-state solution. When people protest this situation, they are called anti-semites or in my case, self-hating Jews.

    The real danger of anti-semitism in the U.S. comes from and has always come from the radical right wing in this country, and we forget that at our peril.

    1. Dan, carrying a banner that says “Free Palestine” is a political statement. Writing it on a window of Hillel is antisemitism.

      You said, “I find it very disturbing that the writer’s only concern is what is happening to Israelis in the face of the enormous and deliberate destruction in Gaza.” But the writer was talking about antisemitic incidents at BU, to American and other Jewish students, not to Israelis.

    2. This is actually a great example of an anti-Semitic double-standard, ironically.

      Defacing a Jewish space with antisemitic graffiti is no different than someone defacing a Black community space with a racist slogan, or a Muslim space with Islamophobic graffiti.

      Antisemites, racists and Islamophobes have long argued that their positions “are based on legitimate disagreements” and have tried to advance their positions calling for the marginalization of the groups they hate and target as “political speech.”

      Demanding that Jewish students uniquely endure this treatment — which would roundly be rejected in any other context — is antisemitism (whether or not it’s intended to be).

  7. As a family we are disheartened by the lack of leadership at BU. Our son choose to attend BU because of it’s diversity and commitment to educating global citizens. We are from South Florida and have a wide range of friends, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist and Muslim who are saddened by what is happening. I applaud the student who wrote this article. I am proud of you and pray for your safety.
    The antisemitic banner calling on worldwide genocide needs to be removed. It is a wrong on every level.

  8. It would be constructive for critics of the university to clarify exactly how leadership has failed or fallen short. In reading these many comments in BU Today since October, critics have repeatedly pointed to happenings on other campuses as evidence of pervasive antisemitism at BU, or accused the “university” of being silent, which is factually untrue.

    Who has the authority to speak for Boston University? Ultimately, it is the president, who very clearly said “We are appalled by and condemn the attack by Hamas on the State of Israel and especially the intentional and large-scale targeting of noncombatants.” (Source linked below).

    Since that statement, there have been numerous vigils honoring the Israeli victims and hostages on Marsh Plaza, large-scale events at Hillel, and targeted outreach to students with home addresses in Israel. This has all been covered by BU Today with stories and photographs.

    I sincerely and humbly ask, what is lacking from leadership? Where could leadership have done more for the Jewish student body without simultaneously alienating and ostracizing its Palestinian or Arab students?

    The actions of Mitchell’s classmates are not acceptable in any form and could absolutely be characterized as bullying, prejudice and antisemitism. I don’t dispute this at all. But Boston University has 34,000 students and 10,000 faculty and staff (Source linked below). It’s a massive, global community with every opinion and persuasion you could imagine. To label the entire institution, or its leaders, as antisemitic strikes me as unfair, or at the very least, a not properly evidenced characterization.

    (Source: https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/bu-community-leaders-respond-to-israel-hamas-war/?utm_campaign=bu_today&utm_source=email_20231012&utm_medium=intrograph&utm_content=community)

    (source: https://www.bu.edu/plan2020/strategic-priorities/community-big-yet-small/#:~:text=With%20more%20than%2034%2C000%20students,University%20is%20a%20big%20place.)

  9. I think it’s really telling that of all three student articles in relation to this topic only one of them mentioned the unique discrimination that Jewish AND Palestinian/Arab/Muslim students were facing.

    I hope bu does address the rise in hate and does not take a one sided approach.

  10. Antisemitism as a reaction to the existence of Israel validates the necessity of a Jewish state. You cannot hate Jews for wanting a Jewish state, if a Jewish state is what they need to survive from your hate. Antisemitism only solidifies the need for Jews to have their own nation.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *