2018–2019 Lecture Series: PERSONS
Welcome to the Boston University Institute for Philosophy & Religion!
We are now into our 2018-2019 lecture series, on the topic of “Persons.” This series draws deeply from the tradition of Boston Personalism, in which this very Institute has its roots, to celebrate our 50th year of lectures and courses at BU! More information will be available soon, but we hope you will plan to join us this semester!
Please join us for our third lecture of the season:
“Personhood and Interpretations of Embodied Cognition”
Shaun Gallagher, Lillian and Morrie Moss Professor of Philosophy, University of Memphis
Wednesday, October 24, 2018, 5:00 pm
Boston University School of Theology
745 Commonwealth Avenue, Room 325
List and links to last year’s lectures below!
Marya Schechtman’s precise and careful argument in favor of a tripartite bio/psycho/social view of human personhood forced us to challenge the mostly-Lockean roots of many “commonsense” ideas about who we are.
Video of Professor Schechtman’s lecture is available here.
David Lamberth opened our series with a discussion of how several key personalists, including William James and Hermann Lotze, grappled with the problem of consciousness and agency in a seemingly mechanistic universe.
Video of Professor Lamberth’s lecture is available here.
Paul Bloom explained his thoughtful critique of the concept of empathy, and told us why it makes a poor guide for moral decision making. Instead, he recommends reasoned compassion, and makes a compelling case for its superiority in this regard.
Video of Professor Bloom’s lecture is available here.
Anna Bialek discussed Alexander Nehamas’s view of friendship as the promise of happiness, but cleverly reversed his formula to focus on the happiness of promise that we derive from spending time with the people we love.
This lecture was not recorded
Kieran Setiya presented his unique stance on the nature of personal acquaintance, and the incredible difficulty of explaining precisely what it consists in, forcing us to rethink what it means to know someone, to love someone, and to bear moral responsibilities toward someone.
This lecture was not recorded.
Molly Farneth walked us through the difficult, sometimes esoteric works of Hegel, in search of a refined and sophisticated understanding of conflict and reconciliation that recognizes the ongoing nature of differences, even within close-knit communities.
Video of Professor Farneth’s lecture is available here.
Stephen Bush introduced us to the difficult thought of Emmanuel Levinas and Iris Murdoch on the question of whether the immediate ethical demands made by the face of the Other can be broadened into an ethos of care for the world at large, and whether mere empathy is sufficient for ethics.
Video of Professor Bush’s lecture is available here.
Marion Holmes Katz gave us an insightful discussion of the struggle to locate love within the broader narratives of Islamic studies, and made it clear for us that traditional pictures that take love to be the exclusive domain of Sufism are misguided and out of date.
Video of Professor Katz’s lecture is available here.
Wendy Doniger introduced us to the concept of dvesha-bhakti, a hatred so powerful that, over time, it transforms into a kind of devotion.
Audio of Professor Doniger’s lecture is available here.
Robert Merrihew Adams started our series for the year with a discussion of the seeming contradiction between the nature of love–namely, that it can only be love if it is had for the sake of the beloved–and God’s commandment to love thy neighbor.
Video of Professor Adams’s lecture is available here.
Peter Hawkins delivered our final lecture of the year, on Dante’s Divine Comedy, with a beautiful explication of the steps along Dante Pilgrim’s journey from the depths of the Inferno, to the heights of Paradiso.
Video of Professor Hawkins’s lecture is available here.
Our symposium with Brita Heimarck, Jason McCool, Victor Coelho, and Joseph Winters was a big hit, bringing the blues, jazz, and hip-hop into our philosophical discourse about hope and despair in some very interesting ways.
Video of Professor Winters’s lecture is available here.
We had a great panel discussion with Jamel Velji, David Frankfurter, April Hughes, and Michael Pregill, on the wide variety of apocalyptic thoughts and movements, along with some–sometimes disturbing–similarities between them.
Video will be available soon.
We thoroughly enjoyed Professor Jordan’s talk on the Dionysian nature of beauty, especially as it appears in Plato’s Symposium and the works of Nietzsche (two thinkers who might not be so incompatible in this regard, after all).
There will not be any video of this lecture.
Professor Coyne offered us a look at the changing understanding of the relationship between hope and despair by tracing a path through the thought of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida.
Video of Professor Coyne’s lecture is available here.
Professor Marasco’s lecture on critical theory after Hegel, and especially on the notion of dialectical despair and its strong motivational power for “the ruthless critique of everything existing,” challenged us to think in a radically different direction about what despair is and how it acts in our lives.
Video of Professor Marasco’s lecture is available here.
We received Professor Chignell’s Kantian approach to the question of why we ought to be hopeful, even in this modern era of climate change and global strife. What we saw was a picture of the world in which every opportunity to make a difference, no matter how small, is cause for hope and action.
Video of Professor Chignell’s lecture is available here.
Professor Schilbrack gave us a glimpse into a more inclusive and expansive philosophy of religion as he envisions it for the future of the discipline, and Professors Lewis and Pritchard gave sharp, insightful responses. Much food for thought was generated in a wonderful start to our series this year!
Video of Professor Schilbrack’s lecture is available here.
Our full schedule of this past year is here
Also, be sure to follow us on Facebook: Boston University Institute for Philosophy & Religion