Do You Feel Safe Riding the T?
Do You Feel Safe Riding the T?
New report says “safety is not the priority” for the MBTA, makes recommendations after multiple mishaps
“Safety is not the priority at the T, but it must be,” is the conclusion of a damning report released Monday by the MBTA that says the agency has prioritized budget issues and capital improvements over the safety of its 1.3 million daily passengers.
It’s a report that carries significant interest at BU, where the MBTA’s Green Line B trolley serves as the main artery through campus, carrying students, faculty, and staff to classes and jobs along a mile-long Commonwealth Avenue stretch, from Kenmore Square to Packard’s Corner. Approximately 160,000 people ride the Green Line daily.
The report, commissioned by the T in June following a Red Line derailment, notes that several accidents in recent years have “resulted in multiple injuries, millions of dollars in equipment damage and repair costs, significant delays, unpredictable service, and increased dissatisfaction amongst regional stakeholders and customers.” The panel says system inspections are neglected by a T safety department that’s “somewhat debilitated.”
A three-expert panel slammed the #MBTA this week for bumping safety concerns to the bottom of its priorities list. — Do you feel safe riding the T?— Boston University (@BU_Tweets) December 9, 2019
The report was discussed by the T’s Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) Monday. The panel comprised former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood, former Federal Transit Administration official Carolyn Flower, and former New York City transit system chief Carmen Bianco.
“While the agency performs the necessary core functions to be considered a relatively safe system, many aspects of the T’s approach to safety and operations need immediate attention,” the report states. “In almost every area we examined, deficiencies in policies, application of safety standards or industry best practices, and accountability were apparent.”
Here are the six key recommendations by the panel regarding how to make America’s oldest subway system (1897) safer:
- The T must set “safety objectives, safety performance targets, and safety performance indicators” based on best practices—and spend the money needed to implement them, including “sufficient human capital.”
- “Identify all areas where deferred maintenance is occurring.”
- The T must devote resources to collecting data, particularly in departments dealing with maintenance-of-way, training, and medical issues.
- The T should consider adopting, system-wide, safety standards now governing its commuter rail operations and set by the Federal Railroad Administration.
- The MBTA’s leadership needs “more seasoned transit professionals with operations and safety expertise and experience.”
- The Massachusetts legislature should be asked to reduce the current mandate that the FMCB meet 36 times annually. Alternatively, staff prep for those meetings should be made less burdensome, as the time required subtracts attention from safety issues.
Among the recent T accidents, a Green Line D trolley derailed in June near Commonwealth Avenue and Beacon Street, injuring 11 people. The T suspended the trolley driver, saying investigators had ruled out any equipment malfunctions. Coming during both a Red Sox double-header and Boston’s Pride Parade, the accident forced the T to replace the trolley with buses to carry its thousands of passengers that day.
That same month, a half-century-old Red Line train derailed at the JFK/UMass stop in Dorchester, an incident captured on video. That accident snarled commutes for days afterwards, turning the average Braintree-to-South Station ride from 25 minutes into a nearly hour-long ordeal.
The mishap, requiring repairs to equipment housing, signals, and switches damaged by the careening trolley, did not involve operator error.
Responding to the report’s release, MBTA general manager Steve Poftak says the authority has been working to improve safety and has already begun implementing many of the report’s recommendations. “This has been a constructive and collaborative process that focuses on the highest priority of the T, the Control Board, and the SRP: making the T a world leader in transit safety while we provide reliable, dependable, attractive service every day to our 1.3 million riders,” he says.
Some stations are the perfect setting for apocalypses films: dark surrounding, pilling paint, leaking water, periodic sparks from shortened wires and rusty trains produce the grinding sound of a wounded dinosaur.
The MBTA consistently prioritizes new capital investment (new cars, extending rail lines) over maintaining/rehabilitating what they already have. This is for many reasons, but one of the most important is political: it’s harder to get federal funding for operation costs, and MA politicians know that it’s much more sexy to point to new trains and new lines than it is to say that they repaired a bunch of signals (no matter how crucial those signals are). Until those things change, the MBTA will always be falling apart. Someone has to have the courage to raise taxes on driving and road use.
Riding the T is, statistically, much safer than travelling by car (to include Uber and Lyft rideshares and taxis)… Incidents on the T rarely result in fatalities or injuries. When they do occur, they are announced in the news. Meanwhile car fatalities happen so regularly, they rarely make the news.
foh y’all clearly never seen the new york subway