Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 2 comments on $30 Million from AHA Bolsters Framingham Heart Study

  1. I remember an earlier article with a lot of crying about grant funding from the NIH being cut and how it would impact projects like the FHS. Now here we are today with the private sector stepping in to fund this important research.

    I know there are many in academia who have become beholden to the government for their funding and frankly this model is fundamentally flawed even in the best of economic times.

    This story proves the point that the public willingly and generously donates money to those causes it sees as being truly important to our humanity and that organizations like the AHA know how to put this money to the best use. Unlike tax dollars, if this money is misused the public will not donate to the AHA again.

    We need to change our thinking about research and how it is funded in this country. As researchers nothing stops you from creating your own 501c to attract money to fund your research. You can build a website to showcase your work to date and let the public decide if it wants to fund more of it and to what extent with a tax deductible donation. Think of the benefits of no more peer review by colleagues vying for the same tax dollars. Think of the benefits of infinitely variable amounts of funding for the truly infinitely variable needs of researchers.

    Finally, BU needs to revise it internal model starting with bringing back tenure for senior MED professors so that these brilliant people are no longer competing with more junior scientists for limited research funding and their time can be better devoted to teaching the next generation of clinicians and scientists rather than spent chasing funding.

    This nut can and will be cracked but not by those who stand around crying about it.

  2. The writer thinks it is great that AHA has stepped forward to take over the funding of the Framingham Heart Study. And it is. But it is sad that as a nation we don’t recognize what is important to the entire population. The instant you rely on private funds, the data becomes an economic resource. Maybe, I certainly hope, that AHA will make all the data acquired with their donation. But I chill at the thought that some private – for profit – company might volunteer to be the funding source and simply keep the acquired data for their own benefit. The profit motive is very strong that way. The government should have the mission of addressing all issues that apply to the common good.
    This includes, but is not limited to, defense, the economy, health and “stuff like that.”

    It seems to be fashionable to want to have, as Rand Paul argued recently, a ‘government free zone.’ He never proposed that private enterprise build the roads, utility connections and even the street signs. He never said that private industry should provide police, street cleaning, garbage collection, as well as schools for the children of workers in this ‘fanciful’ government free zone. And of course, he presumes that no one has to pay taxes.

    Instead of treating government involvement as ‘the enemy’, both in not providing ‘government free zones’ and not using its resources to provide both the infrastructure and the futuristic direction of the country, treat the government as a partner. It then becomes a partner that can serve the entire country’s well being and ‘common good.’

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *