Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 6 comments on Icelandic Meltdown

  1. There are 55 countries in the U.N. with less than five million people. We should be a little bit cautious. And if that’s the truth, maybe we ought to also watch how we try to export our version of democracy. It may not be right for other countries, either.

    If your argument is that many people in small countries are idiots and blame the United States for all their problems – including the withdrawal of the USAF after Iceland bitched about the airbase for decades – then I could not agree more: Many people do not have the adult intellectual or emotional capacity to support a democracy.

  2. I think that the article, which seems to ME to be advocating caution, is much closer to being on the money than the above comment. We can’t just go around assuming that our way of living is the best in every way for everyone. I think that he was just saying that we should take into account the various disparities between America and other countries. We can’t just go around blindly advising other countries to follow our pied piper lead all the time.

  3. Mr. Corgan says:
    “The chairman of the central bank in Iceland made some unguarded comments on a TV interview show, saying, “I’m not sure how we’re going to deal with this”.”

    This is inaccurate, even totally wrong. The Bristish Chancellor, Mr. Darling, told the British Media thar he HAD BEEN TOLD by Icelandic authorities that ICELAND, WOULD YOU BELIEVE IT, WOULD NOT PAY. Here mr. Darling can only be referring to the telephone conversation between himself and the Icelandic Chancellor, Mr. Mathiesen, the day before. The contents of this telephone conversation has not been made public, but must be the root of UK´s harsh reactions (not the words of the chairman of the central bank in Iceland in a TV interview in the evening of the same day – this chairman does not dictate policy in such matters.

    Mr. Corgan and/or you should ask about this telephone conversation – a transcript is bound to exist somewhere.

    Best regards,
    Fridrik Th. Gudmundsson
    Iceland,
    Journalist

  4. Two comments on my piece.

    First, for Fridrik Gudmundsson. That the Chairman of the Central Bank does not dictate policy was a subtlety certainly lost on people in the UK who were demanding that their government do something. David Oddson’s comments on Kastljos (spotlight) certainly did not help matters, that was my point. As to the conversation between Chancellors Darling and Mathieson, without further comments by either, and I cannot find transcripts, we cannot know what Darling “can only” be referring to.

    Second, I certainly do not think people in small countries are any more idiots than we are. The writer says that “Iceland bitched about the airbase for decades.” Some Icelanders did. But many more Icelanders supported or accepted the base and many leaders in public life over those decades took often unpopular stands in supporting NATO and the base. It is simply too simplistic to say that “Iceland bitched.” What is not in question is the peremptory way we left in 2006. As one prominent politician said, “A 55 year alliance was ended with a phone call.”

    Michael Corgan

  5. I am from Colombia, a beautiful country in South America. I think US has been helpful in improving our democracy. Without Plan Colombia, the terrorists would’ve taken control of the government. I recognize how difficult is for a Country to be a “democratic country”. I think the US political model is the best, and it’s because most of its people respect the suble rules of democracy. One example of it is how Hillary, Hukabee and Mitt Romney accepted their defeat and helped their opponents in the campaign to the presidency. For other leaders in the world, that action is impossible; they prefer to form another new party. I respect US government and hope that one day Colombia can survive without the “big help” from the US.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *