Neuroscience Research Guidelines
The Research in Neuroscience Guidelines or Honors Research in Neuroscience Guidelines (as appropriate) should be reviewed with your research mentor prior to submitting this application. These guidelines outline the responsibilities and expectations of each party.
Please read the following responsibilities for students participating in Undergraduate Research in Neuroscience.
Responsibilities of the Student:
Application: This online application for undergraduate research should be filled out in collaboration with your research mentor. Your research mentor must electronically approve your submitted application. After review and approval by the Director of the Undergraduate Program in Neuroscience you will be registered for the research course indicated in your application and you will receive an email confirmation.
Research: Proposed projects must meet the definition of scientific research, meaning that, at a minimum, you will: learn the background and scientific context of the research done in your mentor’s lab
(through reading the scientific literature and conversations with lab members); be able to articulate
the research question and hypotheses of your research project; gather data and/or generate models to
help test these hypotheses; and contribute to the analysis and interpretation of your data in
consultation with your research mentor.
Research projects must also fall within the field of neuroscience, broadly construed as the study of
the structure and/or function of the nervous system. Projects that do not involve the nervous system
(e.g., projects focused on the behavior of humans or non-human animals without any investigation of
the nervous system) will not be approved.
During the academic year, you are expected to devote a minimum of three to four hours per week per credit to a project. During summer terms, you are expected to devote a minimum of six to eight hours per week per credit. Other research-related obligations like lab meetings may count towards this time commitment. Please note: you are not permitted to be paid (e.g., through UROP) and receive academic credit at the same time.
Neuroscience Faculty Mentor/Sponsor: To find a Neuroscience faculty research mentor, you can review and contact BU faculty listed online, ask your assigned academic advisor for suggestions, or talk with TFs in your courses. If you find a research mentor outside of CAS, Dr. Muscedere will serve as your CAS sponsor and the liaison between the Neuroscience program and your non-CAS mentor. You are expected to meet with your research mentor on a regular basis during the semester to discuss expectations, your research progress, and any issues or questions that you may have regarding your research experience.
Grading: You and your research mentor must discuss their grading requirements and expectations together before the semester starts. for Junior and Senior level classes, this discussion will also include a review of the required assignments listed on the course syllabus (available here). At the end of the semester your Neuroscience faculty mentor will assign your grade or, if you are working in a non-CAS lab, your mentor will communicate a grade to Dr. Muscedere.
BU Hub requirements: Students will earn BU Hub units for research-for-credit courses taken at the Junior or Senior level. The Hub units earned will build with each continuing semester of research. The specific Hub units can be found in the course syllabi.
Student Information
Course Information
Mentor/Sponsor Information
Required Training and Certifications
Research Proposal
A brief scientific abstract is between 150-250 words and should give an overview of what your research will entail. An abstract typically includes information on the background of this research, materials & methods used, and expected results.
This section should be about 100-500 words. It should describe background information of the previous work by your mentor and other scientists underlying the scientific question and its significance to the field of biology. Use in-text citations for any statements of fact that are not common knowledge (see Cited Sources section below).
This section should be about 100-500 words. It should begin with a clear “if-then” sentence as follows: “If (restate the hypothesis) is true, then (state what will happen if you perform this experiment).” This is followed by a brief discussion of the methods being employed, needed controls, etc. Use in-text citations for any sources for methods or reagents previously developed (see Cited Sources section below).
This section should be about 100-500 words. It will require you to describe the format the data will be collected in (e.g., measurements taken through an electron microscope). This could include a description of the expected result if your hypothesis is supported. Be sure to describe how your data will be analyzed so as to confirm or reject any of your hypotheses. This section should end with a description of the next steps for each outcome. Use in-text citations for any proposed analytical methods previously developed by other scientists in the field (see Cited Sources section below).
This section should include a minimum of 3 citations (with in-text citations throughout the Problem, Methods, and Data Analysis sections above). This section should NOT be a simple bibliography list. It should be connected to the in-text citations in the aforementioned sections. The style can be (citation numbers) or author (date).
Assessment Questions