The
cyber doctor will see you now
Page 3
...eighth
grade level.
The all-purpose
search engines, such as Google and Yahoo!, and the simple terms
most patients use to search for information do not lead them to
high-quality health Web sites. Only 35 percent of sites identified
by these engines were based on proven, scientific claims and did
not endorse a product, according to research published in August
of 2003 by Michael Slater and Donald Zimmerman of Colorado State
University’s Department of Journalism and Technical Communication.
A significant number of promotional sites, 20 percent, touted unproven
treatments, and some of these included “pseudoscientific claims”
that may mislead even readers with college-level scientific education.
An additional investigation found that less than one-quarter
of the first pages of links displayed by search engines led to relevant
sites.
Patients find it difficult to wade through these search results
and locate the useful sites. “People have to make on the fly
decisions about what’s on the screen in front of them,”
Slater said. Whether or not the site advertises a product and who
sponsors the site are crucial indicators of the objectivity and
reliability of the site. However, patients often cannot get this
information from the search listings, Slater and Zimmerman’s
study found.
Given the abundance of health information on the Web, its variable
quality and the inadequacy of popular search engines as navigators
of this information, patients frequently have trouble finding reliable
material. “There’s a bit of a free-for-all on the Internet
right now,” said Dr. Scherger. “It’s as if all
print material looked alike, such as The National Enquirer and The
New England Journal of Medicine.”
The sheer mass and amorphous quality of the Internet make regulation
very difficult, according to Dr. Slater. Many physicians say regulations
will never selectively prevent health content from being posted
on the Web, as that could impinge on the source’s right to
freedom of speech. For now, agencies only regulate overtly dangerous
health information that runs counter to laws protecting consumers,
regulating drugs and preventing fraud, “letting the buyer
beware,” as Dr. Kuppersmith explained, in all other cases.
Dr. Thomas Bodenheimer, a professor of family and community medicine
at the University of California at San Francisco, said the Internet
has much to offer... |