Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  595 / 676 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 595 / 676 Next Page
Page Background

GOLDWATER

597

middle; and its peculiar combinations of primitivism and sophistication,

achieved through adjustment, balance, checks, compromise, muddling

through, fear of extremes, and seeming resistance to explicit ideologies–

all these forms for canceling out or concealing conflicts represent a

triumph of middle-class civilization. This centrist Utopia, dedicated to

the philosophy 'of the middle, has been like a great blotter, soaking up

radical as easily as conservative ideas, and giving everything, including

the most outrageous acts and ideas a uniform look.

So far, the Goldwater strategists have shown they have learned their

history lesson. Since the rumpus created by Senator Goldwater's earlier

expressions of fondness for extremists, he has been trying hard

to

act

like a man whose bark is bigger than his bite, which is the standard

form of politicking in this country. Sure, Senator Goldwater has been

sounding off about American manhood standing up to the menace of

Communism, but in such a vague and contradictory way that one wonders

whether the war or the peace talk is the vote-getter. It is now expected

that a presidential nominee, particularly a Republican, must accuse the

President of being soft on Communism; but Goldwater has been balanc–

ing his brinksmanship lately with the argument that a "soft" policy leads

to war. Actually, Goldwater has been more extreme on domestic issues,

where he probably felt he could get away with it.

I do not mean to minimize the ugliness of the forces and ideas that

have moved in on the Republican party. I have always been uneasy

about the neanderthalism lurking in the so-called average man; and the

experience of fascism shell-shocked my generation into a fear of every–

thing on the Right, which probably leads us to exaggerate the political

meaning of things that are just stupid, or philistine, or mercenary. No

doubt it is more decent-and safer-to overestimate rather than to under–

estimate the "menace of fascism" at any moment. But it is also not very

interesting or useful to trot out the old cliches whenever the Right

begins to stir.

It

could be that the political witticism that fascism will

come in the guise of anti-fascism here will turn out to be true. But in

PARTISAN REVIEW

is the one magazine that must be

rea1d wide awake.

See page

611

for some of the reasons.