Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  557 / 676 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 557 / 676 Next Page
Page Background

RADICAL RIGHT

557

this country-and a growing one I fear-which is fully prepared

to

reject in its entirety the experience and judgement of all of us who have

had to deal responsibly with the problem of Communist power over

these last thirty years." And he concludes, "so strong is now their

prevalence in Congress and certain other segments of government in

Washington that it is not an exaggeration to say that we have today

two wholly different and mutually contradictory foreign policies be–

ing pursued simultaneously in that city, and you can find whichever

of them you want, depending on which door you want to put your

head in."

Goldwater's candidacy has taught me that what I dismissed as

Mr. Kennan's timidity was really caution. All the constructive parts of

his lectures are dominated by the consideration that proposals for

improving American-Russian relations must be considered in this new

and increasingly hostile climate of public opinion. On East-West trade,

for example, he tells us bluntly that no sane or consistent American

attitude is possible. And he takes the example of the wheat deal to

show how little business interests weigh in the balance against Con–

gressional prejudice. "The Russians .of course have a great shortage

of it," he writes,

and the United States a great surplus. Both shortage and

surplus are the effect of irrational agricultural policies pur–

sued by the two governments for ideological reasons. . . . In

these circumstances, the basis for a deal, or a series of deals,

would seem on the face of it to be very much present. The

United States, by selling its wheat, would make it possible

for the Russians to go on giving their farmers inadequate

incentive for the production of grain; they,

by

purchasing it,

would make it possible for the United States to go on giving

its own farmers too much.... American statesmen of earlier

decades would have been amazed to learn that there could be

any hesitation about so obviously advantageous a proposition.

But in 1964, trade with the Soviet Union and even with such anti–

Soviet Communists as the Yugoslavs has become "a focal point for

political and emotional hesitations." The best that Mr. Kennan can

hope is that Congress will be persuaded not to sabotage the efforts

to expand East-West trade of those European countries, including

Britain, whose economic policies are conducted in terms not of ideology

but of business interests.

In his proposals for disarmament and disengagement, Mr. Kennan

is still more cautious because he realizes that here American anti-