• Doug Most

    Assistant Vice President, Executive Editor, Editorial Department Twitter Profile

    Doug Most is a lifelong journalist and author whose career has spanned newspapers and magazines up and down the East Coast, with stops in Washington, D.C., South Carolina, New Jersey, and Boston. He has written two two non-fiction books, a true crime story about a pair of New Jersey teenagers charged with killing their newborn, and "The Race Underground," about the history of subways in America. He worked for 15 years the Boston Globe in various roles, including magazine editor and deputy managing editor/special projects. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 7 comments on BU Sees Drop in Black Students Enrolled after Supreme Court Affirmative Action Ruling

  1. This article claims that the academic quality of our classes improved when race was factored in. Assuming that’s true, either a) underrepresented students were not generally unqualified or b) they were, but average SAT scores and GPAs and such went up anyway because the broader applicant pool got stronger. The article goes on to say that when qualifications were the only thing to be considered (post-ruling), minority representation decreased. That means that pre-ruling, students who enjoyed racial boosts in the admissions process had below-average scores. Honestly hard to believe that was ever legal.

  2. Unsure what all the panic is about when, as the article says

    “the percentage of Black students who applied for admission was nearly identical to last year”

    Sounds like they will be stepping up their efforts in future years to do whatever they can to sidestep the courts ruling.

    1. Many self-identified progressives in senior administration at Boston University have grown less liberal and more left. They now find themselves, enthusiastically, on the side of compelled speech and race discrimination.

      Despite her inapposite quote about a SCOTUS decision that polling shows is broadly supported among Americans of varied racial or ethnic backgrounds, I continue to hope that President Gilliam will be a wise and moderating leader who, in the words of Fareed Zakaria, “abandons higher education’s long misadventure into politics, retrains its gaze on its core strengths, and rebuilds its reputation as a center of research and learning.”

  3. If a student is a product of several different ethnic groups (like me), should the student identify with one of those groups to enhance their chances of admission or to help BU’s statistical profile? No, please! Let me be me, and admit me because I’ll be a good student, learn the material, and be a credit to BU for the rest of my life.

    I’d like to see an admissions application that has an essay question: Explain why you will be a good student. That is more important than test scores, high school grades, or any other determinant.

  4. What the article, of course, fails to address is asking who replaced these students? Perhaps it was other students who were more qualified in terms of grades, scores and overall merit. Perhaps it was other minorities. Perhaps it was not. Should it truly matter what the melanin count in your skin is for admission to BU?

    I challenge BU and other schools to stop their backdoor, discriminating attempts to create some “perfect race mixture” in their student body. I do not see how creating a “perfect race mixture” – in lieu of merit – is somehow morally acceptable. You are marginalizing a person’s individuality in favor of the melanin count in their skin. It is sad that I even have to waste words rationalizing and pointing out how hypocritically and morally void this whole concept is.

    In any case, let us stop dithering. If you want to establish a skin-color requirement by percentage in lieu of merit BU, than do it. There are many despicable historical systems which could BU could model such a policy on; these are, of course, well known to all. So, I challenge BU. Put your money where your mouth is.

    So. Either we use merit, or we use skin color. But let us stop pretending with this hypocritical “mixed system” where we openly utilize race as a factor, call ourselves “progressive”, and then label those who disagree with utilizing race as racists!

  5. It’s unfortunate that the cluster that was the FAFSA process was not considered in all of this. Surely this also had some impact on where folks chose to enroll…

  6. To the other commenters, I think it is important to understand the primary motivation for the implementation of affirmative action. The core purpose of this policy is to level the playing field and provide opportunities for the historically marginalized in order to make up for America’s detrimental practices towards people of color in the past.

    Although it may appear that equity and discrimination are no longer issues for people of color in terms of college, people highly underestimate the extent to which America has disadvantaged people of color financially and educationally, which definitely has an impact on their college application.

    When it comes to college admissions, affirmative action simply allows admissions officials to take into account a POC’s background as an explanation for the contents of their application; it does not automatically force them to select a POC over a non-POC.

    To put it into perspective:

    An admissions officer receives two applications,

    A student with a 1500 SAT who attends a prestigious school and works at his family’s business

    The other from a student with a 1300 SAT who attends a public school and participates in 4 impressive high school extracurriculars and is the founder for 2 of them

    Without affirmative action, applicant two wouldn’t even be considered. However, affirmative action allows the admissions officer to take into account that applicant two did not have the same financial advantage or opportunity as applicant one; in this case, applicant two’s application is still competitive for what they were capable of achieving.

    In the context of this article, the decline in POC admissions was not due to their lack of performance, but rather to the fact that no matter what they do, they will never be able to compete with Billy, who was able to meet with Congress thanks to his father’s connections and financial status.

    Affirmative action allows for POC to be considered assuming they had a tougher upbringing which presented challenges, to which they typically do. Non-POC from economically disadvantaged areas are also eligible for affirmative action. Affirmative action applies to people who don’t even realize they are eligible for affirmative action, so advocating for its removal disadvantages more people than you might think.

    Affirmative action can be utilized outside the context of admissions, such as creating summer immersion programs targeted towards low-income students and universities increasing their outreach efforts in lower income or predominately POC communities.

    The removal of affirmative action eliminates any possibility for equity in universities and will only require many students to work even harder to be on the same level as others despite not having access to the same resources.

    Many countries do not make an effort to improve the situations of underdeveloped communities, so it was heartwarming to hear that at least BU made an effort and will still continue to try.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *