• Rich Barlow

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Rich Barlow, an older white man with dark grey hair and wearing a grey shirt and grey-blue blazer, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Rich Barlow is a senior writer at BU Today and Bostonia magazine. Perhaps the only native of Trenton, N.J., who will volunteer his birthplace without police interrogation, he graduated from Dartmouth College, spent 20 years as a small-town newspaper reporter, and is a former Boston Globe religion columnist, book reviewer, and occasional op-ed contributor. Profile

  • Molly Callahan

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Molly Callahan. A white woman with short, curly brown hair, wearing glasses and a blue sweater, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Molly Callahan began her career at a small, family-owned newspaper where the newsroom housed computers that used floppy disks. Since then, her work has been picked up by the Associated Press and recognized by the Connecticut chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. In 2016, she moved into a communications role at Northeastern University as part of its News@Northeastern reporting team. When she's not writing, Molly can be found rock climbing, biking around the city, or hanging out with her fiancée, Morgan, and their cat, Junie B. Jones. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 5 comments on Prayers, Photos, Testimonials: BU Grieves a Year of Deaths in the Middle East

  1. Why is BU allowing demonstrations that honour terrorists on October 7th, a day that marked the second largest terrorist attack in western history? 1,200 Israelis were slaughtered by terrorists – that’s what the day should be about. The fact that a defensive war that has resulted in the deaths of human shields used by Hamas can be commemorated on another day. BU continues to kowtow to those who stand against American values.

  2. It’s troubling to see how the language in this article subtly yet significantly shifts responsibility away from Israel when discussing the tragic loss of Palestinian lives. The narrative suggests that Palestinian deaths simply occurred without an active agent, as if they were incidental. This is evident in the use of passive voice when mentioning that “41,000-plus Gazans [are] dead,” whereas the deaths of Israelis are described in active terms—”Hamas attack on Israel that killed 1,200 Israelis.”

    The implication of this language choice is clear: Israeli actions are softened or distanced, while Palestinian deaths are presented as almost self-inflicted. This rhetorical framing contributes to a one-sided portrayal, overlooking the role of the genocidal Israeli government. This narrative has persisted for decades, and it’s shameful that the death of thousands of innocent civilians and children has not changed this. Additionally, the article fails to acknowledge Israel’s escalating attacks in the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.

    This article’s choice to frame the situation as a “war” is misleading and downplays the significant power imbalance. By using this term, the narrative suggests an equivalency between Palestine and Israel, as if they are two equally matched forces in conflict. In reality, this framing obscures the fact that the IOF’s military capabilities and resources far exceed those of Palestine, which has led to what many international bodies and human rights organizations recognize as genocide.

    Moreover, referring to it as a “war” ignores the historical and ongoing apartheid system Israel has established over Palestinians. For decades, Palestinians have faced systemic discrimination, restricted movement, and severe limitations of their resources. This is not a case of two sides with equal power or rights, no matter how language or media tries to twist it. These choices in wording contribute to a narrative that minimizes the reality of oppression and the profound injustices faced by people in Palestine, Lebanon, and the broader Middle East, which deserve clear and honest acknowledgment. This is the bare minimum.

    1. To answer your question, Hamas committed a terrorist attack on the sovereign state of Israel. Israel has responded by trying to eliminate the terrorists, as any country would do. Hamas knows that Israel has an army (not a surprise!) and commits war crimes daily by hiding behind civilians The number 41,000, which is provided by the terrorist organization itself, does not distinguish between Hamas terrorists and the civilians that it scandalously hides behind. To blame Israel is outrageous. Imagine if Mexico launched a terrorist attack on the U.S. and killed 30,000 Americans – that’s the equivalent. Would the U.S. not respond? To in any way compare Israel’s defensive maneuvers to Hamas’s terrorism and war crimes is outrageous.

  3. Disgusted by the language use in this article.

    “On Monday, the one-year anniversary of the Hamas attack on Israel that killed 1,200 Israelis, triggering a response that devastated the militant group and has left 41,000-plus Gazans dead”.

    Who killed the Gazans? Use active language!! IDF KILLED, MURDERED 41.000 Gazan children, women and men. Honestly, at this point just skip the dead Gazan people as they apparently died from ambiguous reasons?

    Disgusted.

    1. Exactly. Referring to them as “Gazans” rather than Palestinians strips away their identity and detaches the issue from the decades of oppression that Palestinians have faced. This choice of language attempts to separate Gaza from the larger Palestinian struggle, as if it’s an isolated issue rather than part of an ongoing reality for all Palestinians.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *