• Molly Callahan

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Molly Callahan. A white woman with short, curly brown hair, wearing glasses and a blue sweater, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Molly Callahan began her career at a small, family-owned newspaper where the newsroom housed computers that used floppy disks. Since then, her work has been picked up by the Associated Press and recognized by the Connecticut chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. In 2016, she moved into a communications role at Northeastern University as part of its News@Northeastern reporting team. When she's not writing, Molly can be found rock climbing, biking around the city, or hanging out with her fiancée, Morgan, and their cat, Junie B. Jones. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 10 comments on Donald Trump Is Running Again. Can He Win?

  1. Reading this article in BU Today, just like so many others on the topic of politics, I think that we can safely say that when the University claims to value Diversity, they most certainly do NOT mean diversity of opinion.

  2. “We saw Gen Z come out in huge numbers for Democratic candidates—do you expect they’ll have a similar impact in 2024?

    Shames: I sure hope so.”

    Right off the bat, it’s clear that the interviewee has an agenda. It used to be (not so long ago) that professors provided impartial information in their professional roles.

    1. Nice- attacking your fellow professor. Seems to me that “the interviewee” gave plenty of impartial information. But yes, it’s terrible that she expressed her own feelings, isn’t it? In an *interview*.
      …Because everyone is so bland and impartial when it comes to DJT, right?

      1. I think Ari here is alluding not just to the formerly-neutral arbitrators of thought now being unapologetically biased, but the predictability of where they land. There has to be some understanding that roughly half of the people reading this don’t agree with you (or, presumably, me).

  3. As a politically moderate voter who has a strong dislike for Trump, I was hoping for more of an impartial, objective take than what this article provided.

    1. “It seems plausible; he’s done it before. But the midterms showed a lot of people in his own party his weaknesses. It is not inevitable that he’s going to be the nominee.” >> that’s impartial and objective enough for me. This isn’t a forum in which the interview isn’t allowed to express their personal feelings.

      1. We haven’t learned that the silent majority in this country has previously voted for this underdog and may do so again. People are not impressed with the current President’s lackluster results. His approval rating may be at an all-time low. They weren’t happy leading into the last time Donald Trump ran, and he won. This article had an opportunity to include that other perspective, but didn’t.

  4. “It was never Trump’s party”… Well, that may be so. But with very few exceptions (Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney. Adam Kinzinger…), the entire party sure seemed to be licking Trump’s boots for the last six years, including coming to his defense in regards to the January 6 insurrection. If they now try to show their “true feelings” about the guy (i.e., that they secretly hated his guts…), Trump’s famous “base” will make them pay the price (largely in primaries),

    DeSantis, in turn, seems intent on out-Trumping Trump (not in forms of corruption, but in his political stances). We’ll see how the clash of two gargantuan egos goes. It will be fun to watch them tear each other apart (assuming that DeSantis has the guts to try it–he was in the military, yes, but he was a lawyer).

  5. Nothing wrong with someone expressing their viewpoint… However, the vast majority of these “Opinion” articles in B.U. today are clearly biased and one-sided (i.e. left-leaning)… I say this as a self-proclaimed moderate. The only counter opinions seem to come from reader comments… How refreshing it would be to have two (or more) differing viewpoints on a particular topic as is done with referendums during election time…

  6. This line, “White women are highly split by age and education, such that the more educated tend to vote Democratic.” “the more educated” tend to vote democrat does not BOLD well for education; considering democrats, aside from abortion rights, are completely out of touch with the average citizen. Frankly, I’m exhausted by both parties and their theatrics! Stop the infighting, and start doing! Doing the work of the people. We’re tired!
    Sincerely, middle class America

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *