POV: Student Debt Is Hurting Our Wallets and Our Health

10 things we need to do to rein it in

an image of a calculator, 100 dollar bills, glasses, a pen, and papers scattered across a surface, all indicating trying to work out finances made into the letters P O V

Photo courtesy of iStock/hidesy

May 1, 2019
4
Twitter Facebook

Generation Student Debt is the unenviable hashtag for 45 million borrowers. They believed that you go to college to get ahead. But for one out of every four Americans, that has required taking on more and more debt.

For the first time in US history, total student loan debt exceeds $1.5 trillion, surpassing both auto loan and credit card debt. Each quarter, students (and cosigners) add $30 billion in new debt at interest rates as high as 13 percent. Interest compounds once the loan is taken out, increasing the odds that students will graduate with greater debt than when they started. Even seven years after graduation, many owe more than originally borrowed.

Unlike typical consumer debt, these loans can’t be legally discharged in bankruptcy, so the consequences of default can be severe, a financial albatross. Since the 1980s, the average cost of college has increased almost eight times as fast as wages, leaving a widening financial burden to meet.

Some 70 percent of college students will graduate with significant debt. Many students also are doubling down: 40 percent of loans are linked to graduate degrees. After graduation, student borrowers are expending nearly one-fifth of current salary, averaging $393 a month, in servicing debt. And that debt can last decades, taking an average of 19.7 years to pay off. Many don’t expect the debt to be paid off until they’re in their 40s. For college-educated women, where peak earning potential is at age 40 (more than 10 years sooner than male peers), debt repayment can extend past peak earning years.

Recent public-health studies have shown that student debt can affect stress levels and sleep and lead to depression. This debt burden can fall hardest on people of color, for whom parental wealth may not exist and unemployment rates can be disproportionately higher.

High school students often base their college decision not on affordability, but on factors like the most prestigious institution or where friends are going. Loan repayment options are often confusing, and default rates—even in this relatively strong economy—are now 10.8 percent. A decade ago, it was half that. For those who have dropped out of college, default rates are 20 percent and climbing.

Managing this sprawling financial-health crisis demands a multipronged solution.

  1. Government and private lenders need to show greater forbearance, including developing more flexible payment options and at reduced interest cost. Also, there needs to be expansion in the government’s existing income-based repayment plan.
  2. Capping the amount of loan repayment to 10 percent of discretionary income should be a viable option for more borrowers. Doing so would relieve some financial pressure and increase the ability of students to pursue careers that best suit their interests and could provide greater societal benefit. This policy could also have the added benefit of freeing up disposable income towards important retirement savings.
  3. More emphasis should be placed on the long-term financial benefits of graduating in four years or less, exploring needs-based and academic scholarships and possible grant opportunities.
  4. Stakeholders, including lenders and colleges, must do better at teaching financial literacy to students, while disclosing the true cost, risk, and long-term consequences of debt.
  5. High school guidance counselors must better advise students and parents about best-fit colleges, linking career paths with appropriate debt levels. There also needs to be greater focus on creative, lower-cost solutions—like attending community college for the first two years before transferring to a more expensive university. In some cases it might make sense to encourage students to work right out of high school, save money, and then attend college.
  6. Recognize that college is not the right choice for all students. Many could better prosper by attending lower-cost trade schools than high-priced colleges. Public universities and community colleges can be a cost-effective way to gain a desired degree without putting on excessive debt upon graduation. Private universities must focus on finding new ways to tamp down escalating tuition costs, including offering more online course opportunities and the ability to graduate in three years.
  7. More universities could institute “no student loan” financial-aid policies that replace student loans with scholarships, grants, and work-study programs. If colleges are forced to take on more of the financial risk, they may gain added incentive to keep tuition and loan levels manageable.
  8. Financial literacy training needs to infuse high school curricula, especially around financial decisions related to how to best pay for college and other postsecondary educational opportunities. Massachusetts just passed financial literacy standards.
  9. Companies can acknowledge the impact that sizable student debt has on their employees by expanding employee benefits to encompass loan repayments. Employees who commit to long-term employment could see debt reduced. Such good-faith benefits will help attract and retain talent.
  10. Congress could finally address the elephant in the room and abolish legal roadblocks so that student-loan debt, similar to other consumer debt, can be discharged in bankruptcy.

As the ranks of Generation Student Debt grow and gray, they’ll gain more voter clout, forcing Congress to play a greater role in solving this growing financial-health crisis. Previous debt crises have taught us that it is better to address the risk sooner than later. If not, crippling student debt could double by 2025, ballooning to $3 trillion, reducing economic life choices, and further highlighting the sad financial fact that students accumulate much more than just knowledge, friends, nicknames, and diplomas when attending college.

Mark T. Williams, the Questrom School of Business James E. Freeman Lecturer in Management, can be reached at williams@bu.edu. This commentary originally appeared on Business Insider.

“POV” is an opinion page that provides timely commentaries from students, faculty, and staff on a variety of issues: on-campus, local, state, national, or international. Anyone interested in submitting a piece, which should be about 700 words long, should contact Rich Barlow at barlowr@bu.edu. BU Today reserves the right to reject or edit submissions. The views expressed are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent the views of Boston University.

Explore Related Topics:

  • Share this story
  • 4 Comments Add

Share

POV: Student Debt Is Hurting Our Wallets and Our Health

  • Mark T. Williams

    Mark Williams

    Mark T. Williams is a BU Questrom School of Business executive-in-residence and a master lecturer in finance and holds the James E. Freeman Lecturer Chair. He is the founder of UmpScores, a performance app used to measure MLB umpire accuracy. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 4 comments on POV: Student Debt Is Hurting Our Wallets and Our Health

  1. Nice article that takes an intellectually honest look at the problem. Thank you.

    Only point not mentioned was how guaranteed student loans have ironically actually contributed to the rising cost of higher education. Universities are able to continuously jack up their prices because the students just borrow money to pay higher and higher fees. This easy money distorts the free market cost benefit ratio in higher education.

  2. The high cost of education is a big topic now, and the debt it is creating. How else do you expect to pay for the increasingly high salaries of University faculty and Sr management? They are now earning 250k and up, some over 500k. Sadly, most of these folks would argue they deserve it, or that its not enough. Sr Leadership will argue that they have to sweeten the packages of these professionals in order to attract them. But what about the interest on these loans, how much is it and how is profiting? Oh the banks again.. and again and again and again.. banks don’t seem to have enough EVER. And they salaries of banking executives, is it not in the millions now? and again I wonder do they really deserve it? did they earn it? how long are the American people going to tolerate the paying banks the amount of interest they do? Look at the amount of interest paid each year to own a home, by the time the loan is paid you have paid more in interest to borrow the money then the property even costs? How did we allow this to happen? Why should we tolerate it? I don’t see Democrats or Republicans trying to do anything about this. They keep letting the banks get richer and then bail them out with our tax money when they mismanage this giant cash windfall they have already been given.

    1. “I don’t see Democrats or Republicans trying to do anything about this.”

      And you never will because these same banks make up the federal reserve banking cartel that buys up all the government debt which in turn allows career politicians to make the campaign promises they need to get reelected. Once back in office, these politicians borrow and spend with reckless abandon while at the same time blaming the other party for the burgeoning national debt.

    2. I appreciate your comment and completely agree that costs have become totally out of whack, but I have to push back on the perception that the faculty and management salaries are the driving force of this problem. Most faculty are earning nowhere close to $250k/year. I have no idea what administration salaries are, but the numbers don’t add up for that to be the only or even main driving force for the increase in cost. There are many interconnected factors at play, such as (my incomplete list, in no particular order)
      (1) higher expectations of classroom and teaching lab facilities, dorm, and FitRec amenities on campus (higher tuitions and room and board costs mean higher expectations of what one gets for the $$, which leads to more investment in shinier facilities, which requires more funding, which could contribute to increases in tuition, R&B, and fees, which raises expectations of what one gets for the $$… the competition in amenities amongst campuses that are recruiting from the same pool of students also drives this);
      (2) lower and lower funding rates for federal research grants; this is a factor at tier 1 research universities like BU. Students do not have to attend this kind of institution to get a great education, but there are some advantages, such as having topic area experts and innovators teaching courses and the opportunity to gain career-related experience in research laboratories or on-campus internships. There is a real cost to providing these facilities and opportunities; as the federal government has suppressed research budgets, more and more of the burden to fund research, especially for early-stage careers (i.e., lab startup costs), falls to the university.
      (3) And, yes, additional layers of administration requiring more funds be spent on manager salaries. Some of this feels superfluous, but other aspects are in place for the students’ direct benefit. Things like Title IX offices, diversity efforts, the Dean of Students’ office, management and funds to provide undergraduate research opportunities, career services, or undergraduate advising are all there to provide support and protections to students and the university community in a way that was not required or prevalent in the past. There are also additional layers of management to support the research mission of the university; these have also expanded to address the needs for more research oversight (regulation of research involving anything hazardous, genetically engineered, derived from human sources like cancer cell lines, involving human subjects or animal research; larger paperwork burdens on grant submissions, research spending and reporting; open access to research products; careful documentation of any potential conflicts of interest; etc.)

      These are just the first things that come to mind. I do not pretend to know what things most impact the budget of the university and what costs are passed to students in the form of increased tuition, room & board, and fees. But I do want to make the point that many things have been changing at the universities around the country. Increased tuitions are not about taking money from students to overpay faculty. Maybe careful consideration of what the cost drivers are would also allow us to make choices about how to reduce those costs and/or steer students towards institutions that spend funds in ways that aligns with the students’ priorities.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *