• Art Jahnke

    Senior Contributing Editor

    Art Janke

    Art Jahnke began his career at the Real Paper, a Boston area alternative weekly. He has worked as a writer and editor at Boston Magazine, web editorial director at CXO Media, and executive editor in Marketing & Communications at Boston University, where his work was honored with many awards. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 8 comments on Lecturers and Instructors Seek Union Representation

  1. I will refrain from recounting some of the more egregious slights I have experienced as a full time lecturer as I wish to remain anonymous to avoid retribution, but I will say this. There is a big disconnect between what the faculty handbook says with regard to full-time lecturers and actual practice. The stated policies in the handbook are fair, even generous, but they have little bearing on how lecturers are treated. If BU administrators actually followed the stated policies there would have been less interest in unionizing. Unionization offers a chance for full time lecturers to hold the administration to their own words and prevent some of the arbitrary and capricious changes in employment terms lecturers often suffer.

  2. It is possible that I haven’t been around long enough to have faced “arbitrary [] changes in employment terms”, but my experience at BU is so far entirely positive. And quite frankly, I am quite happy with having this position. I know that the union will always over-represent their value, but one should be aware that contract negotiations always include compromises. For example, the contract may include a provision under which circumstance a lecturer will no longer get a new contract. At other universities that have recently been unionized, those provisions include the hiring of tenure-track faculty members in the field that a lecturer teaches in. If this sounds like additional job security, then I don’t know.

    The most disappointing aspect of unionization however is that (1) only a majority of votes cast is enough to get unionized, regardless of the percentage of eligible voters participating and (2) that you only get to vote on your contract if you join the union. This means you are forced to join this organization in order to have a say in your future contracts. If you don’t join, you don’t get to vote on the contract itself. You still pay, however, a representation fee that you also cannot avoid.

    If you prefer not to have a say in your future employment and would rather be represented by a lead negotiator who is not even a faculty member, then I guess you should vote yes. I value my independence and will definitely vote NO!

    1. Wait until you have been here for a few years and have had the chance to bear witness to the administration’s capriciousness. Had this issue come up 12 years ago when I was a new hire I would have agreed with you 100%. That was when I only dealt with my department and not higher level administration. What I have seen and experienced has changed my view of those who manage the business of BU.

      When you have been here for over a decade, having met every promotion criteria only to have those criteria changed or be told that lecturer promotion is not something that really happens. Had your pay cut or course-load increased without notice, been spoken to as though you were a child by administrators who overtly view you as nothing of any consequence. Been told you would be needed the next year in the Fall (during job application season) and then that you aren’t in the Spring when it is too late to pursue anything other than adjunct work in academia. Been told you have to do additional administrative work that was not specified at your time of hire with no compensation. Had tenured faculty unload their service work on you. Then you may start to think a union might not be such a bad thing.

      These are the things that your fellow lectures have been dealing with over the years. Unionization will give us a united voice to demand that the administration make good on their promises and treat us with a bit more respect.

      1. I think this must differ between departments. This at least is the case at other universities and therefore the benefit of unionizing is by no means equal across departments.

        I also think that if someone from the administration would talk down to me and treat me with less respect I would be on my way out. It is as simple as that. No one forces me to work for an employer who doesn’t respect me.

        I of course also have the same option if unionization happens. I will vote NO, but have not gotten my ballot yet.

  3. I voted against the union because I really thought it would worsen my relationship with the University and Met College, and because I think primary organizers are in it for their own self-gratification or remuneration rather than to really improve things. I hope I am wrong on both counts, but so far “Faculty Forward” isn’t giving me much hope.

  4. I am disappointed as to how one sided this article is. It seems much more reflective of BU’s position. Why was no one who is pro-union actually interviewed? Referring to other sources without talking to someone directly seems unfair, biased, and clearing reflective of an agenda. It is disappointing to see BU Today being used this way.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *