• Rich Barlow

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Rich Barlow, an older white man with dark grey hair and wearing a grey shirt and grey-blue blazer, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Rich Barlow is a senior writer at BU Today and Bostonia magazine. Perhaps the only native of Trenton, N.J., who will volunteer his birthplace without police interrogation, he graduated from Dartmouth College, spent 20 years as a small-town newspaper reporter, and is a former Boston Globe religion columnist, book reviewer, and occasional op-ed contributor. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 17 comments on BU Off-Campus Student Digs Being Inspected for Overcrowding

  1. Why is overcrowding any business of the university? This is complete garbage. Are they going to inspect housing elsewhere or only near BU? If students choose to crowd into small apartments because they can’t afford housing in this ridiculously overpriced city, that is their choice. And they should have to deal with any repercussions with their landlord and the city directly. Why should BU be involved in inspections? If they want to assist in helping displaced students find affordable housing, great. But this is not their responsibility to inspect city apartments or to provide student address information. The issue is not overcrowding, or whatever keyword you want to attach to this situation. The issue is lack of affordable housing. And do you think this will solve any ‘overcrowding’ issues? In the future students will be smarter and get PO boxes so BU doesn’t have a record of multiple students at a particular address.

    1. It’s BU’s business because what their students are doing is against the law. Note in the story above that it’s not BU performing the inspections; it’s the city. BU is ensuring that students will have a place to go if the *city* makes them vacate the property.

      1. At one point, going against the British throne was against the law. Lucky for us, some fine anarchists decided to challenge that. Not all laws are meant to last forever. The students are crowding into apartments because there is something unequitable about the system: the price. Boston University can continue to charge exorbitant prices for housing and price out the middle and lower class student altogether or they can take a stand and provide some real incentive for these students to remain in on campus housing. Grants that cover 1/2 the cost of on-campus housing for students hat need those funds would be a start. However, BU won’t do this. They’ll continue building new housing towers for the rich who pay their academically unqualified children’s tuition and fees in cash up front. This allows BU to continue raising costs each year, sending the frugal student hunting for other housing options. Insert overcrowding of off-campus apartments. Now I’m curious as to what Boston considers overcrowding. Is it have multiple beds in a bedroom? Because if that’s the case, many of BU’s on-campus apartments on Bay State, Comm Ave and in South Campus violate that expectation.

    2. you’re right about the lack of affordable housing! But it’s not like BU is just narc-ing on students: the law mandates the information be submitted. Overcrowding is illegal because it’s potentially dangerous… Allston fires are no laughing matter and exceeding occupancy is often a contributor. Don’t let the landlords off the hook too quickly either. Some of these property management companies know good and well that it’s not safe AND illegal for the tenants to have that many folks in one space, but they knowingly lease anyway just for the money. Why would we expect the city or the university to sit idly by when there are situations endangering students?! especially if they can be avoided!?!? Sure it may be cool to live off campus, but instead of answering to an RA you now have the city of Boston enforcing a code of living. The PO box work around might be a sweet life-hack, but let’s just hope it doesn’t get anyone killed. Who knows, somebody might luck out and get an open bed in StuVi2. It’s certainly better than where I live… lol

      1. You are both missing the points. It is not the business of BU. If students can live off campus, than BU has nothing to do with how and where students live. Is BU mandated to provided hosuing information for on-campus students? Off-campus? Both? If they are mandated to provide addresses for off-campus students, fine. But is overcrowding such a big issue in the city in general? If so, why bother students only and not the rest of the community? The story of the boy who died, with all do respect to his family, did not need to be in this article. Overcrowding was not the only violation in that situation, so what were the others? Did the fire alarms work? Was the fire escape in order? Overcrowding is not the only housing issue. The main issue is the lack of safe, affordable hosuing. Some buildings along comm Ave and surrounding areas are well maintained by professional management companies. Many are not. And they are expensive. This is the main issue here. And who lives in overcrowded housing? I would bet they are primarily international students that pay full tuition and are trying to save a bit on housing. They are not the issue. The city has to solve the housing problem and hold owners/landlords accountable. The housing regulations are not enforced. And most renters don’t know their rights. Inform yourself!!! And demand that the city holds landlords accountable! Stop being afraid of your landlords because you are worried you will be throw out or have your rent significantly raised. These are both illegal. Renting an apartment should not be such a slimy dirty experience.

        1. It IS the business of BU/local government because if they admit too many students and they can CAUSE overcrowding. Same as other universities in the area. If places were nicer, they’d be more expensive… that’s the Boston market. Don’t want to be safe? Want to pay less? Go to school in some other geographical location…

        2. ookbot: universities, INCLUDING BU, have to report the addresses of their enrolled students. It’s a MANDATE. that’s it. It’s not about anything else. At least BU is offering to help provide housing so students aren’t totally SOL, and the university’s standing is probably why the eviction is being delayed and students aren’t simply being turned out on the streets. Overcrowding is being dealt with across Boston. I live here and I’ve seen it… I’m guessing this article is focused on BU students because it’s being published by BU Today…. Like I said before, you are dead on with the affordable housing problem, but that’s not enough to expect the city to turn blind eye a potentially dangerous overcrowding issue. Trying to save a bit on housing doesn’t get you a pass to break the law, even if your greedy landlord is willing to risk your life to make a buck. And you’re right… if a landlord is willing to overlook occupancy rules, you can almost be sure there are other safety codes that are being neglected as well.

  2. It just kind of seems like BU is trying to find ways to get people to move back on to campus, which is incredibly expensive. It totally defeats the purpose of moving off campus in the first place. Do you think people want to live further from school (especially in this weather)? No, it’s all about what students and their family can afford.

    1. What a stupid thing to say. These forums should be for bringing people together, not for attacking each other and being personal. When I came to boston, it was a lot less expensive. Housing costs have increased substantially. Look up the numbers yourself, it’s out of control.

  3. First off, for anyone who would like to speak on this, these are both worth a read.

    http://suffolklawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Crane_Note_WDF_PageProof_.pdf

    http://www.boston.com/real-estate/news/2015/01/08/city-will-inspect-off-campus-student-apartments-and-legal/jT74HkK18RtPxWONXdxjIL/story.html

    This is the business of the City and the University for a number of reasons. It is also completely legal.

    Primarily, student safety is a concern of both the city and BU. Overcrowding IS dangerous. Not just to the students living in the overcrowded households, but to their neighbors and other residents. In places with large apartment complexes or clustered triple-deckers, fire spreads quickly. So every resident has a vested public safety interest in not having an overcrowded or unkempt household upstairs or next door. The city and BU both have a vested interest in not having fires kill students and residents. The city also have vested in not having large fires destroy houses and increase public safety costs.

    So here is why it is legal:

    1. Your right to live with as many unrelated people as you would like does not fall under the right to assemble, either at the federal or state level. This is confirmed by a large amount of case law.

    2. College students are not a protected class. Equal protection has been very strictly applied both at the state and federal level. To put this is context, mentally handicapped citizens have been denied protection as a protected class under equal protection. College students do not have a history of discrimination and have the ability to fully participate in the political process.

    3. The city has shown its vested interest in limiting undergrads living together, both through neighborhood preservation and public safety.

    4. The bylaw requiring the university to release your information to city inspectors is legal under FERPA. It is not unique or identifying to your name. It simply represents instances of students living off campus.

    My point is not that agree with the ethics of the city somewhat arbitrarily putting a limit on students living together. Ultimately safety should be the utmost concern, so maybe the city should consider creating a mechanism that would allow landlords to properly outfit houses to handle a large amount of residents (residential sprinkler systems and central station fire alarms), instead of just denying large residency based on status as a student.

    Ultimately the by law, is constitutional (both federally and at the state level) and if you have a problem with it great!

    Students have the same opportunity to participate and challenge these laws. Contact the ACLU, rally grass roots support. Do something. Literally anything other than just breaking the law and complaining about it in a comment sections.

  4. The point is that overcrowding is not the issue. When you mark such a thing as the issue, you are almost blaming the renters, and perhaps to a lesser extent, the landlords (but they will rent their apartments regardless). Safe, affordable housing – is this not a basic need? The landlords always win. It should not be this way. There should be better laws in favor of renters and they should be enforced. Why don’t you all see that we all benefit from this? If we harp on overcrowding, and removing students from their homes, we are placing the blame on students. If there were other safe, affordable options for them, don’t you think they would prefer to have their own bedroom? Better living conditions?

    1. Actually overcrowding is exactly the issues. Auto sprinklers (which are required in lodging houses and dormitory style building) save lives in fires. Deadly fires are more likely to happen in overcrowded homes (http://www.worldcat.org/title/urban-residential-fires-an-empirical-analysis-of-building-stock-and-socioeconomic-characteristics-for-memphis-tennessee/oclc/36632582).

      Binland Lee, who was mentioned in this article, was killed when she was unable to get out of a burning structure. This was a structure that was run as an illegal boarding house and did not have multiple means of egress, auto sprinklers or central station alarms (as they should have). Had these been in place, this tragedy may have been averted.

      So yes, this is about overcrowding and safety. Rents are not set by the city nor do they control prices. Housing prices are set by supply and demand. If you would like to pay less for rent, move to a city where there is less demand. I hear Brockton is nice this time of year.

  5. I’m not sure how this is possible seeing as BU overenrolled this year and has students living at the Holiday Inn. When I had trouble with my on-campus room last semester and looked to switch to another residence on campus the Housing Office was rude, unprofessional, and completely unhelpful in finding accommodations. I was told there was no available housing since 70 students were already living in the Holiday Inn. So how do they have 200-230 available beds for students who have chosen to live off-campus..?

  6. The City should take a look at the apartments in East Boston that pilots and flight attendants use as crashpads. 14 beds in a 2 bedroom apartment. Granted, there aren’t 14 full time residents. Usually 2-3 there at one time.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *