Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 5 comments on Do BU Students Need Medical Amnesty?

  1. In a similar spirit to good Samaritan laws, amnesty encourages people to help their brethren by creating an environment in which the person seeking help won’t be punished for their appropriate judgment in choosing to aid a debilitated person.

    As the policy exists right now, people are being asked to seek help for their peers at consequence to themselves, which is significantly counterproductive. This is living in an idealistic, unrealistic world.

    Seeking help at guaranteed consequence to oneself is tantamount to punishing oneself. People are naturally going to be disinclined to punish themselves.

    Punishing people who perform good deeds in right judgment discourages people from seeking help, if not dissuades them from seeking help at all. With retribution guaranteed, students are going to be more inclined to take their chances and hope that their friend is not one of the 1700 / millions (<1%) who die from alcohol-related incident instead of taking the appropriate measures to ensure their friend's well-being.

    Put in real world terms, as in not Boston University policy, retribution raises the threshold at which people will be willing to seek help. People will wait until problems are more severe before seeking help, if at all. It's simple economics (if the people making the policies actually take advantage of the resource that's probably less than a half a mile away from them).

    The image of idealism and morality has its place until somebody dies needlessly because the people who could have helped were expected to do so at their own expense.

  2. I think this makes perfect sense and applaud the student union for pursuing this change. clearly, it will enable students to get help more quickly and safely.

  3. We should definitely have medical amnesty. No policy should put anyone’s health in danger, it’s just not worth it. A problem may arise though, where those who are dangerously intoxicated and need medical attention may get amnesty, but what about those who just have a buzz and are caught by their RA? In either case, maybe the “punishment” should really be requiring a certain number of sessions with a mental health professional. They will be expelled or lose their scholarship based on their grades, so if they maintain their behavior they will pay in the end anyway.

  4. Absolutely. No student should have to weigh the costs and benefits of calling for medical attention, but I personally know many people who have had to face that decision. When you see your entire academic career flashing before your eyes, it gives one pause. BU should not put their students in that terrible position.

  5. Decisions, consequences.

    The decision to drink irresponsibly ITSELF contains the possible medical conditions and “troubles” that a student might get into.

    Such an amnesty policy will prohibits students to educate themselves on how to make their life decisions in real world conditions.

    If you made a decision, YOU HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *