Skip to Main Content
Boston University
  • Bostonia
  • BU Today
  • The Brink
  • University Publications

    • Bostonia
    • BU Today
    • The Brink
  • School & College Publications

    • The Record
Other Publications
BU Today
  • Sections
News, Opinion, Community

Andrew Bacevich on the new American militarism

International relations professor will discuss today how war seduced America

October 18, 2005
  • Brian Fitzgerald
Twitter Facebook
CAS International Relations Professor Andrew Bacevich. Photo by Kalman Zabarsky

Andrew Bacevich is the author of the recent book The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. The CAS professor of international relations will examine the trends that brought about a revival of the prestige of the U.S. military in a discussion on Tuesday, October 18, at 4 p.m. at the African-American Studies Center Library, 138 Mountfort St., Brookline, on South Campus.

Bacevich is a former U.S. Army colonel and a former director of BU’s Center for International Relations. His previous books include American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy (2002) and The Imperial Tense: Problems and Prospects of American Empire (2003).

He spoke with BU Today recently about his book and the upcoming talk, which is free and open to the public.

In your book, you assert that during the past three decades both Democrats and Republicans came to believe in the overwhelming power of our military — that America is preoccupied with military might. Do you think this attitude will change?

Is it possible that Americans will wean themselves from their current infatuation with military power and become once again skeptical of it? Yes, it might happen as we evaluate the consequences of U.S. policy. Are we going to end up thinking that the Iraq war was worth it — or are we going to end up thinking Iraq was a disaster? The notion that our involvement in Iraq was reckless and a mistake — if that interpretation takes hold, then it seems to me that the American people generally, and our leaders more specifically, will probably be somewhat more skeptical about using military power in the future.

On the other hand, if we take the view that this was a necessary war — that it was a war of liberation, one that has made us more secure — in the long run we’re in danger of pursuing policies that, at least in my judgment, are misguided with regard to military power. How we, as a people, digest and make sense of Iraq is going to have a large influence on the way we think about military power in the future.

So the outcome of the war will dictate our foreign policy for years to come?

It depends not only on how the war goes, but on how it’s interpreted and how it’s incorporated into our national story. This part of the story will initially be told by the press, and then historians will take up the cudgels and fight with one another over the meaning of the war. That kind of argument tends to yield a certain consensus. For example, as a people, we’re not at odds with one another about the meaning of World War I any longer. There was a time when that was a tremendously contentious issue, but finally an agreement emerged and basically has remained intact for the last 50 years or more. So there will be a big argument in the press and also among historians about the meaning of the Iraq war, and how that argument plays itself out will probably affect not only the way we think about the Iraq war specifically, but how we think about our global military power in general.

What do you think of the opinion that since 9/11 the Bush administration has imposed on us a new set of attitudes about military power — and that this has led to the Iraq war?

The phenomenon that I call ‘the new American militarism’ has been a long time coming, and it doesn’t simply reflect the belief that there is some kind of conspiracy involving the Bush administration. It reflects the way important groups in American society responded to the 1960s and the Vietnam War. Their response focused on rebuilding and in many respects celebrating military power. And that effort succeeded, so that by the time we get to the 1990s, there is this infatuation with power — this great confidence that the American armed services can do just about anything. There is a conviction that we figured out the secrets of high-tech warfare, which can be counted on to achieve a swift and economical victory in almost any circumstances. All of that is getting tested in Iraq. If you have my perspective, the test is not going very well.

You have pointed out that your book isn’t a passivist tract — that military force is sometimes necessary. When should force play a role?

Force is a useful instrument, but also an instrument that’s difficult to control. When you use it, you frequently tend to also bring about consequences other than those you intended. We rightly entered World War II to fight against Germany, and we succeeded in defeating Germany, which was a necessary and good thing. But as one consequence of that, Soviet dominance extended over Eastern Europe, which became part of a Soviet empire for 50 years. That was an unintended consequence of a necessary war, so you should use force with a lively awareness that you may get a lot more than you bargained for, and therefore you should use force only when it’s absolutely necessary.

Explore Related Topics:

  • Faculty
  • Global
  • Share this story

Share

Andrew Bacevich on the new American militarism

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Brian Fitzgerald

    Brian Fitzgerald Profile

Latest from BU Today

  • Education

    What’s Behind the Rise in Violence Against Teachers?

  • Fine Arts

    How I Made This: Jacob Whitchurch (CFA’26)

  • Things-to-do

    To Do Today: Seaport Sweat

  • Film & TV

    Did You Win Free Tickets to See Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning Tonight?

  • COMMENCEMENT 2025

    Experience BU’s 2025 Commencement from a Terrier Point of View

  • Obituaries

    Remembering Leslie Epstein, Pillar of BU’s Creative Writing Program

  • Voices & Opinion

    POV: This Memorial Day, Remember BU’s Fallen Heroes by Visiting the New Online Honor Wall

  • University News

    23 Charles River Campus Faculty Promoted to Full Professor

  • Commencement 2025

    Photos: A Look Back at BU’s Commencement

  • Theatre

    It’s “Prom Season” at Wheelock Family Theatre

  • Things-to-do

    Six Spots to Check Out This Memorial Day in Boston

  • Campus Life

    Video: Class of 2025: What We’ll Take with Us as We Begin a New Chapter

  • Health & Medicine

    What Does Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis Mean?

  • Watch Now

    BU’s Class of 2025: What Are Your Plans After Graduating?

  • Fitness

    BU Sports Rehab Therapists on Jayson Tatum’s Achilles Injury and Recovery Ahead

  • Commencement 2025

    Sights and Sounds from Boston University’s Class of 2025 Commencement

  • Commencement 2025

    Video: 2025 Graduate Jayde Best: “I Ended Up Exactly Where I Wanted to Be”

  • Commencement 2025

    “Empathy Is Essential,” BU Commencement Speaker Emily Deschanel Tells 2025 Graduates

  • Voices & Opinion

    I’m a Business Professor Who Asked Dozens of Former Students How They Define Success

  • Commencement 2025

    Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Convocations a Joyous Affair

Section navigation

  • Sections
  • Must Reads
  • Videos
  • Series
  • Close-ups
  • Archives
  • About + Contact
Get Our Email

Explore Our Publications

Bostonia

Boston University’s Alumni Magazine

BU Today

News, Opinion, Community

The Brink

Pioneering Research from Boston University

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Weibo
  • TikTok
© Boston University. All rights reserved. www.bu.edu
© 2025 Trustees of Boston UniversityPrivacy StatementAccessibility
Boston University
Notice of Non-Discrimination: Boston University prohibits discrimination and harassment on the basis of race, color, natural or protective hairstyle, religion, sex or gender, age, national origin, ethnicity, shared ancestry and ethnic characteristics, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation, gender identity and/or expression, genetic information, pregnancy or pregnancy-related condition, military service, marital, parental, veteran status, or any other legally protected status in any and all educational programs or activities operated by Boston University. Retaliation is also prohibited. Please refer questions or concerns about Title IX, discrimination based on any other status protected by law or BU policy, or retaliation to Boston University’s Executive Director of Equal Opportunity/Title IX Coordinator, at titleix@bu.edu or (617) 358-1796. Read Boston University’s full Notice of Nondiscrimination.
Search
Boston University Masterplate
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Andrew Bacevich on the new American militarism
0
share this