Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 18 comments on Armed Robbery Suspect Released Pending Trial

  1. It’s ridiculous that they release this kid just because he is 17. I knew of several people in high school (in Massachusetts) that were charged as adults for nonviolent drug/alcohol offenses, but commit armed robbery and you can go back on the streets in less than two weeks! Its no wonder so many young people are willing to turn to crime.

    1. He was released pending trial: “Milton, [the 17-year-old] who will be tried as an adult, could receive a minimum sentence of five years in state prison.” I’m sure the other two were also released until the trial, but since they’re juveniles that information wasn’t given out. (Note: you’re a juvenile until age 17, not 18, which is why they told us the 17-year-old’s name other info.) Also, “The severity of the juveniles’ sentences will depend on whether they are tried in criminal court or juvenile court,” meaning they could get serious jail time as well, if the judge decides to try them as adults.

    2. Well as he’s still going to school, it is very important that he doesn’t miss too many classes in order for him to get his degree. I mean, picture him with no high school degree – he won’t have many perspectives others than to return to criminality! But if given a proper education, he will be able to find a normal job and he can be a valuable member of society. By letting him go back to school, you actually help him NOT to return to crime.

    3. It’s called inocent until proven guilty. Also, if you read the article it says that he has a GPS device, has to go to school, and has to stay on a curfew. Then everything will be evaluated by a judge at the time of his trial. If you ask me, it is better for a 17 year old kid to be in school and if found guilty be put in jail. Also, he is being charge as an adult, which is why they can give out his name, unlike the other two.

    4. Chillax. He is 17 with no prior offenses, GPS monitored, and has a ridiculously tight curfew (enforced by GPS monitor). The point of the punishment is to prevent repeat offending. The judge probably thought he had a better chance of being rehabilitated if he were not held in jail for the entire time (which would prevent him from going back to school).

      I’m not saying he is the victim by ANY means. I am only saying that maybe he can learn his lesson and live a normal life.

      Now, if you think of jail as strictly a punishment rather than motivated by a desire to rehabilitate, then that is your view…but eventually he would be released from jail and would have a higher likelihood of committing crimes.

  2. If this kid doesn’t think the consequences of crime are worse than what his life has to offer, don’t you have to wonder about what kind of options we as a society are providing him? Besides, the one who has been released is 17and is being tried as an adult.

  3. “Milton, who will be tried as an adult, could receive a minimum sentence of five years in state prison.”

    There’s all sorts of fun details between the headline and the comment section.

  4. It is really quite unwise to release these individuals. This was armed robbery! They were not pointing an ice cream cone at their frightened victims. Yet, if someone shows up in our living room in the middle of the night and we defend ourselves, we would have a lot of explaining to do.

    I am sure it’s all about politics. Unacceptable. It makes you want to leave the State of Massachusetts

      1. It is not the weapon. It’s the threat to do bodily harm with it. Of course if not remanded, it would send a message that we do not believe in the rule of law.
        The reason why we see so many repeat life criminals, is that they did not become adequately punished in their youth.

  5. 5 years works for me. Whatever the mandatory minimum is for these little jerks, they should tack on a few years to send a message. I have no sympathy for these juvenile delinquents. I grew up poor too, and owned BB guns, but I never thought to go around sticking it in people’s faces to rob them of their possessions. Maybe time in the slammer will build some character for them.

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *