Boston University School of Law

Legal History: The Year Books

Record Detail

 
Previous Record Next Record
Image
For an image of this report text from the Vulgate Year Books Reprint, click here.
Seipp Number:
Year
Court
Writ
Marginal Heading
1425.003 1425 Common Pleas Trespass for breaking close and cutting grass Chalenge
Term
Regnal Year
King: Plea Number Folio Number
Hil. 3 Hen. 6 3 24b
Serjeants/ Justices Plaintiff Surname Plaintiff First Name v. Defendent Surname Defendent First Name
Rolf. Thomas Sjt (for P)
Paston, William Sjt (for D)
Rolf, Thomas Sjt
Martin, John JCP
Toucester John
Other Plaintiffs Other Names Places Other Defendents
Abridgements Cross-References Statutes
Statham Challenge 14
Fitzherbert Challenge 16 (not in margin)
AbrBkAss Challenge [32]
Brooke Challenge 7 (not in margin) 
20 Hen. 6, fol. 41
13 Hen. 4, fol. 15
20 Hen. 6, fol. 42, 43 
 
Incipit (First Line) Number of Lines
John Toucestre port brief de Trespas vers R.B. de bruser al clos, & de pues ses herbes. Le defendant 13
Process and Pleading
Defendant pleaded that the land was defendant's freehold.
The parties were at issue.
The inquest came at Distraint ready to give their verdict.
Plaintiff challenged a juror who was chosen arbitrator for defendant for the same trespass.
Defendant replied that the juror was chosen arbitrator as one of four impartial (indifferent) persons.
Plaintiff rejoined that he chose two arbitrators and defendant chose two.
The triors prayed that they could be sworn to say the truth.
This was done, and the triors affirmed that the challenged juror was chosen by defendant alone.
The challenged juror was withdrawn.
Language Notes (Law French)
Sjt Rolf (for P): il fuit autrefois eslue arbittor pur le defendant
Sjt Paston (for ): nous mismons en arbitrement, & ordine de iiij persones indifferente; issint uit il eslue come personne indifferent
Martin JCP: indifferent arbitrors
Purque les triors prient que il peut estre jure adire le verite; Purque il fuit tret (= withdrawn)
Abstract Context
Commentary & Paraphrase
Choice of arbitrators. If each party chose two arbitrators, then the party's two arbitrators were presumed to be favorable to the party if challenged as jurors. If both parties together chose four arbitrators, the four would be presumed impartial (indifferent).
Manuscripts Mss Notes Editing Notes Errors
AbrBkAss Challenge [32], fol. 53v, stated, in Trespass a juror was challenged because he was chosen to be an arbitrator for the same trespass and that he was chosen by the plaintiff; and it was adjudged a peremptory challenge, (but) it is otherwise where he is indifferently chosen by both, etc. Hil 3 Hen. 6; query if one (juror) be named (arbitrator) by the plaintiff and another by the defendant indifferently.
Translations/Editions
Plea Roll Record Year Record Plaintiffs Record Defendants Last Update
0 2004-10-09
Keywords
Soil
Freehold
Case
Issue
Inquest
Appearance
Distraint
Challenge of Juror
Arbitration
Ordinance
Indifference
Impartiality
Person
Choice
Arbitrator
Stranger
Part
Trior
Swearing
Truth
Affirmation
Withdrawal.
Previous Record Next Record

Return to Search