B.U. Bridge

DON'T MISS
BU Wind Ensemble concert, Tuesday, February 25, 8 p.m., Tsai Performance Center

Week of 21 February 2003· Vol. VI, No. 22
www.bu.edu/bridge

Current IssueIn the NewsResearch BriefsBulletin BoardBU YesterdayCalendarClassified AdsArchive

Search the Bridge

Contact Us

Staff

Balance of power. Occupational therapists (OTs) often conduct interpretive research -- they interview people to formulate new understandings about human experience. OTs are committed to represent this experience as authentically as possible, and in doing so to protect the welfare and dignity of research participants, according to Ellen S. Cohn, a Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences clinical associate professor of occupational therapy. She and doctoral student Kathleen Doyle Lyons (SAR’03) recently reflected on the research process and identified several points where researchers need be vigilant in recognizing the balance of power between researcher and participant.

They point out that researchers “define areas of inquiry, set boundaries around their investigation, choose participants, interpret data, and create a text that will be viewed as authorized knowledge.” They call on researchers to take a “power reflexive stance,” reflecting critically on themselves as researchers and on how power is distributed in all research interactions. The authors cite key points where power is negotiated, including how the researchers introduce themselves and their research, the setting in which research is conducted, and the way that the interview is structured, as well as how much the researcher shares of his or her own personal information. They also consider the power inherent in interpreting data from interviews. They examine the process of incorporating “member checks” into the interpretative analysis -- asking interviewees to respond to the interpretations drawn from interviews and presenting both their own and the participants’ interpretations.

According to Cohn and Lyons, “ . . . power is not an item to be addressed in a research protocol, but an active force embedded in every methodological decision we make.” They propose that all researchers “ . . . continually ask the questions and struggle with the various implications embedded in every methodological choice we make.”
Their article was published in the January/February 2003 issue of The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Body building. It’s no news that the United States is a fat nation -- and getting fatter every year. The number of overweight children doubled between 1980 and 1994, and a 1999 study by the U.S. Public Health Service reported that 13 percent of children ages 6 to 11 and 14 percent ages 12 to 19 are overweight.

In an effort to better understand this disturbing trend, Linda G. Bandini, a SAR clinical assistant professor, and colleagues at the Clinical Research Center at MIT and the Tufts University School of Medicine recently conducted a comprehensive 10-year prospective study to determine how metabolic and lifestyle factors may relate to girls becoming overweight. The initial group included 196 girls between the ages of 8 and 12 who were recruited from public schools in Cambridge and Somerville, Mass.

Since obesity results from an energy imbalance, an increase in caloric intake, a decrease in activity (calories burned), or both, the energy expended by the girls was measured in three component states: resting (RMR), nonresting (NREE), and daily, or total, energy expenditure (TEE). The researchers then analyzed how the amount of energy expended related to the girls’ body composition, maturational stage, race-ethnicity, and the weight status of their parents.

Their analyses of the baseline data revealed several factors that appear to relate strongly. Resting metabolic rate was found to be generally higher among girls with at least one overweight parent than among those with two normal-weight parents. This seems to contradict the commonly held belief that children with overweight parents may have a lower metabolic rate, and thus are at elevated risk for becoming obese.

Nonresting energy expenditure level was found to be significantly lower for girls who had already entered puberty (but who had not yet menstruated-- a state known as premenarcheal) than were those of girls who were prepubescent. Energy measurements in all three states were lower among African-American girls than Caucasian girls, although the study authors state that the sample did not include enough Hispanic and Asian participants to stratify the results by race and ethnicity.

Bandini and her colleagues will next evaluate the longitudinal data they have collected to determine whether the reductions in energy expenditure seen during this premenarcheal period actually lead to increased weight gain throughout adolescence, and to better understand what can be done to halt the increasing trend of weight gain among adolescents and adults.



"Research Briefs" is written by Joan Schwartz in the Office of the Provost. To read more about BU research, visit http://www.bu.edu/research.


BU’s Science and Technology Day will be held on Tuesday, March 25. All graduate students are invited to submit abstracts for posters to be presented on that day. Please see www.bu.edu/research for more information and online submission forms.

       

21 February 2003
Boston University
Office of University Relations