• Rich Barlow

    Senior Writer

    Photo: Headshot of Rich Barlow, an older white man with dark grey hair and wearing a grey shirt and grey-blue blazer, smiles and poses in front of a dark grey backdrop.

    Rich Barlow is a senior writer at BU Today and Bostonia magazine. Perhaps the only native of Trenton, N.J., who will volunteer his birthplace without police interrogation, he graduated from Dartmouth College, spent 20 years as a small-town newspaper reporter, and is a former Boston Globe religion columnist, book reviewer, and occasional op-ed contributor. Profile

Comments & Discussion

Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.

There are 6 comments on Federal Shutdown Shuts Down Some BU Research

  1. I can’t believe it’s come to this. What a catastrophe. The democratic process apparently only works when all sides actually believe that a government as such is a good idea. It’s very telling that such an ideological shift has engulfed half of one of the two major political parties. I only hope the President can invoke some executive recourse to overcome this reckless obstructionism. Thanks, BU Today for the article.

    1. Do you mean that he might be able to convince the Democratically controlled Senate to approve one of the several House plans already forwarded?
      I see that the President sees it his option to change the law, and delay the employer mandate. Is this legal? Yet, when the House proposes a similar individual mandate delay, they are characterised as anarchists.

      1. If the president gave in to a legislative demand to dismantle a law passed by both houses of congress, upheld by the supreme court, and supported by most Americans because a faction of representatives threatened to derail the world economy and shutdown the government, he would be setting a terrible, terrible precedent. This type of behavior by House Tea baggers cannot be tolerated, condoned, or encouraged in any way.

  2. Is this an OP Ed or a piece of legitimate journalism? The article is written from one side, based on the impacts cited, contains opinion and inuendo (i.e. “punitive attempt”) and leads a reader to an opinion by invoking emotion on the toll this shutdown is causing rather than just presenting facts. As to the substance, is it not the responsibility of the peoples’ representation to vote according to their constitucency? Outside of Comm Ave not everyone feels that our tax dollars are being spent most judiciously, and people want and alternative to spending our way out of problems. Shouldn’t part of our government be standing up to give pause to our spending habits? The level of spending is unsustainable. The year over year defecits leading to greater and greater national debt is soon going to criple us. What is being shown right now in DC is courage and strength in the face of unpopularity to try to sway our actions to make cuts to all but the most necessary programs. If unchanged, the pain that is coming will be far worse than the inconvenience we have felt over the last 2 weeks. We as individuals and families try to live within our means, differentiating between the “need to have” and “nice to have” expenditures. Shouldn’t our government be forced to do the same? Even if it means saying no to some “nice to have” expenses?

Post a comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *