| 1491.008 |
1491 |
Common Pleas |
Error |
|
Vavasour, John JCP Vavisor
Bryan, Thomas CJCP Brian
Hobart, James AG le Attorney le Roy |
Grubham |
|
|
|
|
|
Ilchester, in Somerset
Somerset, County of
Hustings (Hasting London), in London
London Hustings (ij Hustings) |
|
| Brooke Errour 146, Utlagary 43 |
21 Hen. 7, fol. 34
11 Hen. 7, fol. 10 |
|
| Un Grubham suit brief d' Error a reverse un utlagary. Et pur cest cause le record quel le Vicount ad return fuit, |
9 |
Plaintiff (former defendant) sued a writ of Error to reverse an outlawry.
For this cause (of reversal), the record that the sheriff had returned was 'at the county (court) held at such a place in the county at such a day and year', and so at other county (courts) (without saying in what county these other county courts were held?).
And he (plaintiff?) showed that other precedents (of reversals?) were thus 'at a county (court) held at such a place in the county'.
Vavasour JCP said that such an outlawry had been reversed recently (devant ces heures) (for this error), and showed how.
Bryan CJCP held this (outlawry?) error.
So in a manner they (Justices of CP) were agreed that it (outlawry?) was error.
Hobart AG (the King's Attorney), said that another county court could not be held anywhere except in the county.
This seemed good reasoning. |
Vavasour JCP dit, que tiel utlagary ad este reverser devant ces heures, &c. monstre coment, &.
Reporter (R.): Mes jeo n' entende s' cas
Bryan CJCP tient ceo errour, &c.
Et issint in manner ils furent agrees que fuit errour
Et l' Attorney le Roy (Hobart AG) dit, que ne poit auter county estre tenu la forsque in l' Comitate dde Somerset, &c.
Et cest semble bon reason
Et fuit touche, que un utlagary certifie 'ad Comitate tenent apud Hasting London', ad este adjuge errour, car sont ij Hustings, & nul sans addicion, & issint covient aver addicion, &c.
Et cest fuit agre pur bon Ley |
Hobart AG (the King's Attorney) said that another county court could not be held anywhere except in the county of Somerset, etc.
and this seemed good reasoning
and it was touched (upon) that an outlawry certified 'at the county court held at the London Hustings' had been adjudged error, because there were two Hustings (courts), and neither without addition, and so (the Hustings court) ought to have had addition, etc.
and this was agreed for good law |
Suit
Reversal
Outlawry
Outlaw
Cause
Record
Sheriff
Return
County
County Court
Holding Court
Local Court
Day
Year
Showing
Precedent
Place
Recently (devant ces heures)
Reporter (R.)
Understanding
Case
Holding
Error
Manner
Agreement
Attorney
King
King's Attorney
Seeming
Reason
Reasoning
Good Reasoning
Touch
Certification
Hustings (Hasting)
Adjudging
Addition
Without Addition
Good Law |
|
