Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  525 / 676 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 525 / 676 Next Page
Page Background

NOTES ON CAMP

525

is of no importance:-except, of course, to the person (Loie Ful–

ler, Gaudi, Cecil

B.

De MiJIe, Crivelli, De Gaulle, etc. ) who

makes

"it.

What the Oamp

eye,. a.ppre<;:i~tes

is the ucity, the force 'of

the '

~rson.

In every move

M~rtha G~aham ~~k~

she's

bclnS

Martha Graham, etc., etc.... This is clear in the case of the great

serious idol of Camp taste, Greta Garbo. Garbo's incompetence (at

the least, lack of depth) as an

actress

enhances her beauty. She's

always herself.

33. What Camp taste responds to

is

"instant character"; and,

conversely, what it is not stirred by is the sense of the development of

character. (This is, of course, very eighteenth-century.) Character

is

understood as a state of continual incandescence-a person being

one, very intense thing. This taste in character is a key eleIT\.ent of

the theatricalization of experience embodied in the Camp sensibility.

And it helps account for the fact that opera and ballet are experienced

as such rich treasures of Camp, for neither of these forms can

easily do justice to the .complexity of human nature. Wherever there

is

development of character, Camp

is

reduced. Among operas, for

example,

La Traviata

(which has some small development of

character)

is

less campy than

Il Trovatore

(which has none).

"Life is too important a thing ever

to talk seriously about it."

-Vera,

Or

the Nihilists

34. Camp taste turns its back on the good-bad axis of ordinary

esthetic judgment. Camp doesn't reverse things. It doesn't argue

that the good

is

bad, or the bad

is

good. What

it

does is to offer

for art (and life) a different-a supplementary-set of standards.

35. Ordinarily we value a work of

art

because of the serious–

ness and dignity of what it achieves. We value it because it succeeds,

in being what

it

is and, presumably, in fulfilling the intention that

lies behind

it.

We assume a proper, that is to say, straightforward

relation between intention and performance. By such standards, we

appraise

The Iliad,

Aristophanes' plays, "The

Art

of the Fugue,"

Middlemarch,

the paintings of Rembrandt, Chartres, the

poetry

of

Donne,

The Divine Comedy,

Beethoven's quartets, etc., etc.; and–

among people-Socrates, Jesus, St. Francis, Napoleon, Savonarola,

and so forth. In short, the pantheon of high culture: truth, beauty,

and seriousness.