Oral & Signed Communication Hub Guide
BU students should be able to communicate information in a coherent formal oral and/or signed presentation, to engage responsibly with others, and to make use of a range of disciplinary-appropriate informal oratory. As with writing, effective oral/signing communicators should prepare remarks with an awareness of their purpose and their audience. Because oral and/or signed communication is generally interactive, students should be able to attend and respond thoughtfully to others. They should also understand that public presentation serves an essentially civic function as a means of participating in collective debate and decision-making. Hub Curriculum Guide
Oral and/or signed communication courses and cocurricular activities in this area must have all outcomes. If you are proposing an OSC course or if you want to learn more about these outcomes, please see this Interpretive Document. Interpretive Documents, written by the General Education Committee, are designed to answer questions faculty have raised about Hub policies, practices, and learning outcomes as a part of the course approval process. To learn more about the proposal process, start here.Learning Outcomes for Oral & Signed Communication
External Resources for Faculty Overcoming Anxiety Resources for Students: Other ResourcesArea-Specific Resources
Assignment Ideas
The following are assignments that faculty have developed for this Hub area:
- Guided activities help students to transition from simple to complex oral communication tasks.
Seeing and hearing others speak (in person, videos, etc.), and engaging students in a discussion on the effective use of organization, gestures, pacing, etc., can oftentimes be more memorable than simply explaining what makes for a strong presentation. In this way, exposing students to models (through TED talks, speeches, or other genres of formal and informal communication) can allow them to recognize and evaluate the components of effective communication; for instance, what makes for an effective persuasive argument?
To help students transition to drafting their own speeches and arguments, you may choose to expose them to different rhetorical models. These include ethos, pathos, and logos.
Having reflected on what makes for effective oral and/or signed communication, students may then practice developing their own skills though informal or low-stakes activities before speaking in a formal, high-stakes situations. For example, students could practice presenting in pairs or small groups before doing so in front of the whole class.
Incorporating such scaffolded assignments allows students to receive feedback and explicit training at each step of the process.
- Debates challenge students to speak clearly, succinctly, and persuasively. In addition, students learn how to select evidence that will be most compelling to their audience and to listen carefully to others so that they can offer targeted counterarguments. Some faculty wait to assign viewpoints until the day of the debate so that students need to prepare to represent both sides.
- Speeches and presentations also serve as effective cumulative assignments.
- Additional sample assignments and assessments can be found throughout the selected Resources section located above.
Course Design Questions
As you are integrating Oral &/or Signed Communication into your course, here are a few questions that you might consider:
- What framework/vocabulary/process do you use to teach the key elements of oral and/or signed communication in your course — such as argument structure, genre, and audience?
- What assigned readings or other materials do you use to teach oral and/or signed communication specifically?
- What assignments — both graded and ungraded, high- and low-stakes –are you developing to evaluate students’ communication skills?
- Do students have opportunities throughout the semester to apply and practice these skills and receive feedback?