      
Mailing
List
Contact
Us
Staff
|
 |
When
they were kings
Down but not out: saga of 1968–69 world-champ Celtics hooks CGS prof
 |

|
|
In a photo from Dynasty’s End, Bill Russell, “the
eagle with the beard,” scores over the Knicks’ Walter
Bellamy in the Boston Garden. Photo courtesy of the Sports Museum
of New England
|
|
 |
By
Brian Fitzgerald
When it comes to deciding what team can lay claim to the most definitive
domination of a professional sports league ever, fugeddaboudit. No, the
Harlem Globetrotters don’t count. And move over, 1949-53 Yankees,
winners of a mere five World Series rings in a row. The Boston Celtics
of the late 1950s and ’60s win hands down. End of argument.
The
Bill Russell–era Celtics managed to accomplish the feat of
being champion in their sport eight straight times. We’re talking
about a franchise that captured the NBA title 11 times in 13 years. So
when Tom Whalen, a CGS professor of social science, wanted to write a
book about the team that has impressed him the most, his choice was clear
-- the broken-down 1968-69 Celtics, who defied the odds and limped to
the NBA championship one last time.
It was the end of a dynasty. Russell
(Hon.’02) announced his retirement
three months after the season concluded, and the Celtics wouldn’t
hoist another championship banner until 1974.
“
This team was special,” says Whalen. “It was totally team-oriented — its
philosophy was get the ball to the open man. The Celtics won because
they had an absolute commitment to winning.”
Dynasty’s End:
Bill Russell and the 1968-69 World Champion Boston Celtics (Northeastern
University Press, 2003), about an aging squad that
had one more gasp of greatness left, is a tribute to an encore performance
in the greatest sports symphony of all time.
It is, however, more than
just a sports tale. In a way, it’s also
a morality play. Whalen, 38, a lifelong Celtics fan from Beverly, Mass.,
remembers their last two championship seasons, 1984 and 1986, like they
were yesterday. But he was only four years old in 1969 — not old
enough to remember that storied season. Still, he decided to write a
book about
the team because its lessons go beyond athletic accomplishment: the Celtics
were in the forefront of efforts to integrate their sport, beginning
in 1950, when they were the first team in NBA history to pick a black
player in the draft.
This was no small accomplishment in Boston, a city
with a history of ethnic enmity. The book begins with a sentence that
seems like heresy
to today’s fans: “Boston did not love its Celtics.” But
the fact was, it didn’t — for a long time. Between 1959 and
1966, the prime years of the Celtics dynasty, they averaged only 6,783
fans
per game. “The brutal truth of the matter,” Whalen writes, “is
that the city’s majority white inhabitants felt uncomfortable paying
money to see athletically gifted African-Americans run up and down the
basketball floor, even when they were wearing the Celtic green.”
Then
came Bill Russell, who had experienced rampant racism growing up in Monroe,
La., along with strained relations between black and white
players on his University of San Francisco team. In Boston, he was an
early proponent of desegregated schools, and he criticized the NBA for
what he considered discriminatory hiring practices. “He wasn’t
like other professional athletes of his day,” says Whalen. “He
spoke his mind.”
On the court, Russell let his skills do the talking.
During the 1956-57 season, the year he joined the Celtics, “he
was a lion,” recalls
teammate and fellow rookie Tom Heinsohn in the book. In the finals against
St. Louis, Russell was a man on a mission, blocking shots, pulling down
rebounds, and generally disrupting the Hawks’ game plan. In game
seven, “the eagle with the beard” hauled down a game-high
32 rebounds, scored 19 points, and blocked 5 shots. The Celtics won in
double overtime, 125-123, earning their first NBA title. Russell was “the
greatest competitor I was ever around,” says Heinsohn. “He
refused to lose.”
In 1969, “the Celtics finished fourth, barely
making the playoffs,” says
Whalen. “They weren’t supposed to go far in the postseason.
But they beat the second-seeded Philadelphia 76ers in the first round,
and then the New York Knicks, to win the Eastern Division.” The
Los Angeles Lakers, whom the Celtics faced in the finals, were heavily
favored to win the title. They had acquired Wilt Chamberlain during the
offseason, and having lost the championship to Boston the previous year,
had a score to settle. “In fact, the Lakers had lost six NBA finals
to the Celtics between 1959 and 1968,” says Whalen. “They
were ready to win it.”
Plus, Russell was playing with considerable
pain from a serious knee injury incurred in the middle of the year. He
would average just 9.9
points for the season. The finals began as expected, with the Lakers
winning the first two games, but the Celts managed to stretch it to the
seventh and final game. In the fourth quarter, “the Lakers were
on the verge of taking control of the game,” says Whalen, “but
with 1:17 remaining, the Celtics Don Nelson scooped up a loose ball near
the foul line and threw up an awkward shot that hit the back rim, squirted
high in the air, and fell straight through the hoop.” The shot
seemed to drain the life out of L.A., and Boston hung on to win the game,
108-106 — and their 11th championship.
To many fans, the famed term
Celtic Pride is synonymous with selflessness and team basketball.
But to Whalen, it also makes a broader statement. “In
a racially divided society, Celtic Pride meant individual players could
put aside their differences — racial, religious, and political
differences
— and come together as a team and accomplish great things,” he
says. “The Celtics really embodied the liberal values that the ’60s
were supposed to be about, the whole notion of equality, integration,
and diversity.”
Russell’s relationship with Celtics fans was “tempestuous” at
times, Whalen acknowledges, but “I think he made his peace with
Boston.” Indeed, the book ends with a scene from a 1999 tribute
to Russell at the FleetCenter, when a voice from the crowd shouted, “We
love you, Bill.” An emotional Russell could think of only one appropriate
response: “I love you, too.”
|
 |