B.U. Bridge

DON'T MISS
The Power of Liberal Arts in the Classroom, a conference hosted by SED's Center for School Improvement, on May 2

Week of 25 April 2003· Vol. VI, No. 30
www.bu.edu/bridge

Current IssueIn the NewsCalendarClassified AdsArchive

Search the Bridge

Mailing List

Contact Us

Staff

ENG designed: better — and bolder — living

When William Oliver, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering (ECE), heard that a friend was having trouble with crows ransacking his garden, he solicited help from undergraduates in his department. Oliver added “crows” to a list of other problems compiled by ENG faculty and alumni. Every year, ECE seniors form teams and select their design project from this list. Two groups wanted to have at the crows, and now they’re competing with slightly different versions of a mechanical scarecrow. One is using infrared sensors that detect the motion of the crows and activate an ultrasonic whistle to shoo the birds away. The other is working on a scarecrow that tracks the crows with a video camera and shoots jets of water at them.

Other ECE teams are designing such things as an online trip planner like Mapquest for navigating Boston on the MBTA, a digital display board for flashing messages from your car window while it is parked (it’s illegal to do this from a moving vehicle), and a device that tracks the real-time position of sailboats in a race. Each of the projects requires the students to call upon their technical knowledge from BU courses, says Michael Ruane, an ECE associate professor, but also to adapt to the evolving technologies on the market. “In their courses, the students are encouraged to work independently and to work from first principles,” he says, “and that’s usually not the way to pursue rapid development on the schedules the real world needs. They need to learn where to apply their creativity most effectively. If you’re reinventing many wheels within wheels, you’ll miss your deadline, you’ll miss your market, and you’ll miss your paycheck.”

Open sesame

Theodore Morse hasn’t had any crow problems lately, but about a year ago he was having trouble opening a jar. When the lid wouldn’t budge, Morse, an ECE professor, suggested that his colleagues in the department of aerospace and mechanical engineering (AME) put some seniors on the case. As in ECE, AME seniors form teams at the beginning of the fall semester and select their project from a list provided by the faculty. The students who took on the jar assignment quickly realized that there were many jar openers already on the market, but there were few affordable, nonmotorized versions to choose from.

“ These types of projects give students experience in coming to grips with defining what the problem really is,” says Morton Isaacson, an AME associate professor and associate chairman of undergraduate studies. “With the jar opener, the team first decided whether it would have a motor or not. Then they raised the issue of who their customer would be. Ultimately they settled on a market niche of people with physical impairments like arthritis.”

For Jill Anderson (ENG’03) and her teammates, the most challenging part of the jar-opening project has been shifting from an independent working style into a collaborative one. “We’re very attached to our own concepts, and so the teamwork — getting us all together on the same page and the same schedule with the same vision — has definitely been the most challenging part,” she says. “We had four different jar openers when we started, but if you look at our sketches in our design journals, you’ll see pieces of each of our ideas in the final design.”

It’s a bird, it’s a plane . . .

Seniors working on aerospace engineering projects rarely have clients come to them with crow or jar problems. Instead, they review the trade literature or consult sources in industry to keep abreast of hot topics that would make for a timely mission. Then they get together in teams to design a vehicle to carry out that mission, first drafting designs on paper and ultimately building a model.

Each person on the team is responsible for a different subsystem in the vehicle, such as aerodynamics, structures, control systems, propulsion, and overall design. According to Donald Wroblewski, an AME associate professor, that group dynamic forces each person to see beyond his or her immediate tasks. “If somebody says, ‘I want to change this in my subsystem,’ it affects everyone else,” he says. “They can’t just go off and work on their own. They have to function as a team.”

In the past, most seniors have designed aircraft, but Wroblewski says that there’s now more interest in spacecraft. “It’s only in the past three years that we’ve done satellites, mainly in response to students working with BU’s Center for Space Physics, which has contracts to do NASA satellite designs.”

This year’s projects include a suborbital rocket-powered plane to carry tourists up to the edge of space and then glide to a landing; a supersonic unmanned aerial reconnaissance vehicle; a foam-equipped amphibious fire-fighting aircaft; and a business jet capable of taking off and landing vertically from a helipad.

Industrious

The department of manufacturing engineering (MFG) is the only one that sends all its teams out to do assignments with local companies. Theo de Winter, an MFG associate professor and a 2002 Metcalf Award winner, sends his students out to companies such as General Electric, Beckton Dickinson, and Cisco, where they come and go as employees. “I don’t know what the project is going to be when I send them there,” de Winter says. “It’s never the same two semesters in a row. I don’t feed them any pre-thought-out project.”

The student teams usually work one full day a week at their companies, says de Winter, where they go about solving a problem that the company needs solved. “One of these groups generally represents the equivalent of three or more man-months,” he says. “It’s quite a resource to the companies.”

The hip bone’s connected to the . . .

Biomedical engineering was the first ENG department to initiate a senior capstone project 18 years ago. Students work independently or in pairs in a BME faculty member’s lab or at a local hospital or biotechnology company.

Justin Voigt (ENG’03) and Allison Weiner (ENG’03) have been working with Dennis Cullinane, an orthopedic surgeon at Boston Medical Center and a MED instructor, on a project that may lead to a treatment for the 20 million Americans with osteoarthritis. There is no cure for the disease, in which articular cartilage degrades within the knees, knuckles, and other joints, but recent research may lead to a new way of regenerating lost cartilage. Instead of putting a broken bone in a cast, researchers have found that the controlled movement of a fracture can cause bone cells to also grow cartilage. Voigt and Weiner have built an experimental device that observes this process in the healing femur of a rat to more precisely measure what kinds of motions coax cartilage from bone. “You’ve gone through these four years of schooling, but it’s gratifying to prove to yourself that you can really cut it,” Voigt says. “It’s a big confidence-booster to know that you can do research that doesn’t have boundaries on it.”

ENG senior capstone presentations build real-world confidence

       

25 April 2003
Boston University
Office of University Relations