       
Contact
Us
Staff
|
 |
Connections
How Special Collections archival holdings tell the story of our time
Jet
proponent propelled invention with friends’ help when Brit government
balked, BU collection shows
By
David J. Craig
In 1930, 23-year-old British fighter pilot Frank Whittle filed a patent
for what would be the world’s first jet engine. But the British
Air Ministry scoffed at the idea, and for the next several years Whittle
(1907–1996) scrounged for resources to develop it. Among the first
to recognize the potential of Whittle’s design was Lancelot Law
Whyte (1896–1972), a consultant on financing new inventions for
a London investment firm. Whyte left his banking job in 1936 to help the
pilot form Power Jets Limited, the small company that built and successfully
tested the first jet engine, in Rugby, England, in October 1937.
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Lancelot
Law Whyte, 1896–1972. Photo courtesy of BU Special Collections |
|
 |
A letter to Whyte from the British scientist H. T. Tizard, dated June
22, 1937, is among hundreds of revealing documents at the BU Department
of Special Collections, part of its L. L. Whyte papers. In the letter,
Tizard, the chairman of the British Air Ministry’s Aeronautical
Research Committee, replies to an inquiry from Whyte, expressing optimism
about Whittle’s jet, which he predicts “is of great importance
from the point of view of defence and commerce.”
But why would Whyte seek out Tizard’s opinion on the technology
more than a year after forming Power Jets Ltd.? Did he have second thoughts?
Or was Tizard merely slow to respond to Whyte’s inquiry? Tizard’s
letter, after all, is dated just weeks before Whittle finally tested his
jet.
A more likely explanation is that Whyte needed the letter to loosen some
purse strings — at the time, Tizard was one of only a couple of
high-ranking supporters of the Whittle project in the British government,
which until 1939 concentrated on developing propeller-driven fighter planes.
A nod from Tizard, with his St. James’ Court address stamped in
the letter’s corner, could have emboldened investors. “My
general opinion of the importance of this work leads me to express the
hope that the money will be raised privately,” Tizard adds in the
letter, “so that the knowledge that it is going on will not be widespread.”
Moreover, confidential memos written by Whyte in subsequent months detail
how Power Jets desperately needed to double its capital in order to see
the invention through, and how the British Air Ministry kicked in very
little money before taking over the company after the war started and
financing the first British jet plane flight in 1941. (Britain took the
Whittle engine seriously only after the Germans flew a jet plane in 1939,
using an engine created by Hans J. P. von Ohain, a German working independently
of Whittle. Years later, Whittle, the acknowledged inventor of the jet
engine, would insist that if Britain had been more supportive of his project
it would have flown a jet long before Germany.)
And who is to say whether the Allies ever would have put a jet in the
air if not for the tenacity of Whyte, who chaired Power Jets and kept
it afloat until the government takeover by vigorously courting investments
from friends? “How peculiarly English,” Whyte wrote in a 1948
essay in the magazine The Listener, “to neglect new ideas.”
For his part, the Edinburgh native considered it his ethical obligation
to be a midwife between “the development of new intellectual conceptions”
and their “appropriate fulfillment in the life of the community.”
The Whyte papers at Special Collections — which contain correspondence
with Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell, notebooks, diaries, and news
clippings — depict a man whose raison d’être was to
champion genius.
Whyte devoted himself fully to writing and lecturing after the war, earning
a reputation as a great humanist and philosopher of science. He authored
several books, including The Next Development of Man (1944) and Critique
of Physics (1931), which tended to focus on the history of ideas and what
he considered the unifying themes in nature and science.
“Mankind must create a society emancipated from all those evils
which it is within human power to banish,” he wrote in The Listener.
“Receptivity to the new, in so far as it can benefit man, is an
ethical ideal, a moral value every whit as important as charity, integrity,
courage, and so on. What is more, it is an ideal which can be socially
realized, in increasing degree. . . . We want a community which will encourage
all discovery. The world imagines that we in Britain are traditionalists,
sentimentally attached to past methods which are no longer effective.
Well, what about it?”
|
 |