B.U. Bridge
DON'T MISS
CFA’s Fifth Annual
Russian Festival, October 22 to 29, unites Russian and U.S. musicians, artists, and educators
Week of 18 October 2002 · Vol. VI, No. 8
www.bu.edu/bridge

Current IssueIn the NewsResearch BriefsBulletin BoardBU YesterdayCalendarClassified AdsArchive

Search the Bridge

Contact Us

Staff

Island hoppers
Sri Lankan tree frogs end game of hide-and-seek

By Tim Stoddard

High above Sri Lanka’s sprawling tea plantations in the island’s last scraps of rain forest, a team of biologists has made an unlikely discovery: a family of over 100 new species of tree frogs previously unknown to science. The researchers, led by Christopher Schneider, a CAS assistant professor of biology, and his doctoral student Madhava Meegaskumbura (GRS’07), say that the finding makes Sri Lanka an amphibian hotspot of global significance.

Most of the newly discovered tree frogs undergo direct terrestrial development, bypassing the aquatic tadpole stage and developing as fully formed froglets within the egg. Photos by Madhava Meegaskumbura

 

Most of the newly discovered tree frogs undergo direct terrestrial development, bypassing the aquatic tadpole stage and developing as fully formed froglets within the egg. Photos by Madhava Meegaskumbura

 
 

While biologists are describing new amphibian species all the time, the discovery of a large group of closely related frogs is a rare event, particularly in a country as developed as Sri Lanka. “It’s certainly not unusual to find new frog species,” says Karen Warkentin, a CAS assistant professor of biology, who studies amphibians in the neotropics. “But finding so many in what was thought to be a reasonably well-studied place is noteworthy.”

The Sri Lankan frogs are a prime example of the vast diversity that has yet to be described in the tropics, says James Hanken, curator in herpetology and director of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University. “This finding reinforces what a number of us have been trying to announce for years,” he says, “which is that there are still many, many undescribed species of amphibians worldwide. That idea catches a lot of people by surprise, because it’s generally assumed that all vertebrate species are known.”

There are currently about 5,400 amphibian species known to science, and while the rate of frog discovery is increasing, Hanken says, many biologists were surprised by the finding in Sri Lanka. Over 95 percent of the island’s forests have been cleared for coffee and tea plantations, and until now, it was thought that the island’s flora and fauna had been exhaustively cataloged. “The British were running all over Sri Lanka for 150 years,” he says, “and they were good naturalists. I think they probably just couldn’t be bothered to describe these little frogs.”

The frogs, which range from husky canopy dwellers with oversized toe pads for climbing to tiny orange denizens of the leaf litter, are a stunning example of adaptive radiation, Schneider says. They look and behave very differently, but their DNA reveals that they’ve recently evolved from a common ancestor, adapting new body shapes to exploit a range of ecological niches.

This lowland species is most abundant near home gardens with good ground cover. It has yet to be officially described, but because of its preference for human landscapes, its working name is Hiniduma anthropogenic.

 
  This lowland species is most abundant near home gardens with good ground cover. It has yet to be officially described, but because of its preference for human landscapes, its working name is Hiniduma anthropogenic.
 

In their report, which appeared in the October 11 issue of Science, the authors suggest that Sri Lanka should be designated an amphibian hotspot. The term hotspot, first made popular by the nonprofit group Conservation International, would attract much-needed attention to Sri Lanka’s frogs, says Meegaskumbura. While it would not carry any legal power, hotspot designation would encourage conservation groups to focus their efforts there rather than in less diverse regions.

At least 270 species of vertebrates have been recorded on Sri Lanka, but until now biologists had documented only 18 frog species. Schneider’s group estimates that it has found over 100 new species of frogs, but it will be several months before they settle on a definitive number.

Almost all of the newly discovered frogs have evolved a trait called direct terrestrial development. Instead of laying eggs that hatch as tadpoles, direct developers bypass the aquatic life stage altogether. Fully formed froglets, which look like miniature adults, hop out of their shells from day one. At a time when scientists are reporting alarming amphibian declines worldwide, the Sri Lankan frogs suggest that direct development might be a safer way to live. Frogs are extremely sensitive to environmental stresses, Schneider says, because most of them have both aquatic and terrestrial life stages. Tadpoles are vulnerable to pollutants and ultraviolet radiation, so direct development might shield frogs from those stresses.

But other researchers are more pessimistic about the fate of direct-developing species. “By no means is direct development a magic bullet that protects frogs from decline,” Hanken says. “There are a dozen species of frogs endemic to Puerto Rico; they’re all direct-developing, and at least two or three species are now extinct.”

First described by British naturalists in the late 1700s as Theloderma schmarda, this reclusive frog is in need of a new name. Molecular analysis of its DNA has revealed that it’s not in the genus Theloderma at all, but has evolved traits resembling that group.

 

First described by British naturalists in the late 1700s as Theloderma schmarda, this reclusive frog is in need of a new name. Molecular analysis of its DNA has revealed that it’s not in the genus Theloderma at all, but has evolved traits resembling that group.

 
 

The Sri Lankan frog survey began in 1993, when Meegaskumbura and four other Sri Lankan researchers from the World Heritage Trust (WHT) began to look carefully at the frogs in highland forests. “The WHT is pretty good with its taxonomy,” Meegaskumbura says, “but we were unsure about the genetic relationships between the frogs. All we knew was that there was a lot of diversity.”

Hoping to sort out the frog lineages, and earn a Ph.D. in the process, Meegaskumbura e-mailed Schneider to inquire about becoming a doctoral student in his lab. With Schneider’s help, he proposed to discern the relationships between these previously undescribed tree frogs. “The project fit in so well with my overall research goals of understanding diversification in the tropics,” says Schneider, whose earlier work with Australian skinks is shedding light on how new species form. “And here was this incredible student who knew so much about these frogs already. There was no way that I was going to pass it up.”

In 1999, Schneider’s group met in Sri Lanka and caught frogs for three weeks in the island’s southwestern mountains. During the five years prior to that expedition, the WHT workers had already cataloged and curated frogs from over 500 sites in the forest, Schneider says, and the bulk of the work was already complete by the time he arrived. The WHT has recently started a captive breeding program for several of the endangered tree frogs. Meegaskumbura hopes to return to Sri Lanka in the summer of 2003 to continue developing that program. The frogs also fit into his long-range career goals. “I’m hoping to work on this radiation of frogs for the rest of my life,” he says.

While many amphibian populations continue to decline, Schneider is hopeful about what new species await discovery in other tropical forests. “If you can turn up 120 species of frogs in a tiny piece of Sri Lanka that’s lost 95 percent of its rain-forest cover, what does that tell you about big, intact areas?” he asks. “Imagine what we’re going to discover in New Guinea. The point is that tropical regions worldwide are still not very well explored.”

       



18 October 2002
Boston University
Office of University Relations