{"id":3768,"date":"2011-08-16T15:19:39","date_gmt":"2011-08-16T19:19:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/?page_id=3768"},"modified":"2011-10-04T11:46:47","modified_gmt":"2011-10-04T15:46:47","slug":"dubois","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/journal\/past-issues\/issue-3\/dubois\/","title":{"rendered":"Banksy’s “Exit Through the Gift Shop”: Street Art and Our Quest for Authenticity”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ethan DuBois<\/a><\/h2>\n

(WR 150, Paper 3)
\nRead the instructor’s introduction<\/a>
\nDownload this essay<\/a><\/p>\n

Many in our modern culture have become concerned with the idea of authenticity. Some argue that we have lost our sense of authenticity and can no longer find a \u201ccenter of self\u201d (Erickson 122). This argument about authenticity is of special interest in the art world since \u201cauthentic\u201d artwork is increasingly sought. No longer is it enough for a piece to employ special craftsmanship or an artistic touch, but it must be \u201cauthentic\u201d to be worthy of exhibition (Phillips). But what makes a piece of art \u201cauthentic\u201d? According to professor and philosopher Dr. Larry Shiner in his article \u201cPrimitive Fakes,\u201d the meanings of words like \u201cart,\u201d \u201cartist,\u201d and \u201caesthetic\u201d have changed since the eighteenth century. By classical definition, \u201c’art’ means any skilled handicraft, ‘artist’ means any skilled maker of an artifact, and ‘taste’ means any set of values for ranking artifacts\u201d (225). However, Shiner explains, these common words have come to take on different meanings: when used in modern discussion, ‘Art’ suggests a distinct realm of works or performances of elevated status, ‘Artist’ implies innovation, individualism, and a devotion to Art as a vocation, and ‘Aesthetic’ suggests disinterested appreciation\u201d (225). This change in our understanding of art over the past two centuries is significant because it illustrates our developing desire for authenticity. In art, we look more for individualism and originality\u2014that is, authenticity\u2014and, in the process, we devalue craftsmanship.<\/p>\n

But what is authentic art, and, even more, what makes an authentic artist? In his recent documentary Exit Through the Gift Shop<\/em> (2010), British street artist Banksy weighs in. He tells the story of French videographer Thierry Guetta, who begins to film Banksy for a potential movie about street art. Instead of creating the revealing film that he promised, however, Guetta ends up becoming an aspiring street artist and then the center of Los Angeles pop art hype for several weeks after the opening of his 2008 art show, \u201cLife is Beautiful.\u201d As director Banksy tells this story, he reveals how our quest for authenticity collides with our standards for art evaluation in modern culture.<\/p>\n

Defining Authenticity<\/h4>\n

In order to properly discuss the concept of \u201cauthenticity,\u201d a term which has evolved over the course of many years, it is necessary to properly define it, and to look at some recent developments in research about the subject. Sociologist Andrew Weigert suggests that our modern conception of authenticity took hold about 70 years ago (qtd. in Erickson 123), although he points out that conversations about it have taken place for several centuries. According to professor and sociologist Rebecca Erickson, the easiest mistake when attempting to define \u201cauthenticity\u201d is to confuse the term with \u201csincerity.\u201d In Lionel Trilling\u2019s book Sincerity and Authenticity<\/em>, he defines sincerity as \u201ca congruence between avowal and actual feeling,\u201d which suggests a specific relation to others (qtd. in Erickson 124). Sincerity, in other words, has to do with one\u2019s feelings and thoughts being in agreement with what one says. Authenticity, however, is simply being true to oneself. As Trilling says, \u201cA work of art is itself authentic by reason of its entire self-definition: it is understood to exist wholly by the laws of its own being\u201d (qtd. in Erickson 124). Thus, authenticity is a concept of self-reference; it has nothing to do with one\u2019s relationship to others.<\/p>\n

Although deeply rooted in many classical and academic fields, authenticity as a social aspiration has only mainly evolved over the past few decades (Erickson 121). Our interest in authenticity today is a result of several factors that have influenced its change in recent years. According to Jeanne Liedtka in her article \u201cStrategy Making and the Search for Authenticity,\u201d theories about the \u201cdriving forces behind this interest\u201d are in great supply and come in two categories: those that focus on external factors and those (adopted mostly by psychologists) that concentrate on internal development (237). Several external factors, Liedtka explains, include a desire to fight back against the mass media and create a unique identity, the rise of \u201cconsumer culture,\u201d \u201cfears of loss of meaning and freedom amidst the rise of instrumentalism and institutionalism,\u201d and the reduced influence and significance of family and other traditional norms in our increasingly tolerant society (238). On the other hand, many developmental psychologists attribute the rising significance of authenticity to a \u201cnatural human urge that seeks psychological health, rather than as a reaction to external factors\u201d (238). In other words, our desire for authenticity is motivated not by environmental reasons but by biological ones. In addition, Erickson argues that, most importantly, our increased attention to authenticity is a result of \u201cthe transition from industrial to postindustrial society and from modern to postmodern culture\u201d (121).<\/p>\n

Whatever the cause, scholars and psychologists alike agree that our modern culture does indeed place great value on authenticity\u2014especially in the Fine Arts. Liedtka explains that a dominant theme of the authenticity discussion in the art world is \u201cthe notion of the authentic as both highly original and simultaneously rooted in familiar traditions\u201d (239). In other words, art critics and analysts bestow authenticity on artwork based on both its originality and its relation to culture and tradition. This method of art analysis could be a result of many of the aforementioned influences, but the importance of both originality and rootedness suggests that it comes from both external factors (finding individuality and uniqueness) and internal ones (seeking psychological health).<\/p>\n

Banksy\u2019s Perspective<\/h4>\n

Banksy uses his film to contribute to this conversation about art and authenticity. A street artist since 1992, Banksy is known throughout the world as one of the primary proponents of graffiti art. He is also known for his contempt towards those who label graffiti art as \u201cvandalism.\u201d In Exit Through The Gift Shop<\/em>, the British street artist focuses on the life of Thierry Guetta, a French cameraman who crosses paths with Banksy and ends up documenting a large amount of Banksy\u2019s work with the intention of creating a documentary about street art. However, as Exit<\/em> progresses, it seems to turn upon itself, as it focuses on Guetta\u2019s entry into the street art world and his success as a copyist of Banksy. Ultimately, through the use of specific scenes and characteristics of the film, Banksy reveals the inauthenticity of Guetta\u2019s art.<\/p>\n

In the very opening of the movie, we see a montage of clips of street artists creating art, set to the tune of Richard Hawley\u2019s \u201cTonight The Streets Are Ours.\u201d This brief foray gives us a privileged look into the worlds of famous \u201cmasked\u201d artists and their craft. We see everything from artists making detailed paintings, to tagging, and even to spraying paint onto the side of a train. The viewer can almost feel the attitude and emotion of the artists as they express themselves in such a public and rebellious fashion. However, a significant question to ask is: is this authentic art? More importantly, what does Banksy think? With our previous definition of authenticity in mind (being \u201ctrue to oneself\u201d), it follows that street art\u2019s authenticity, or inauthenticity, has much to do with the artists\u2019 motivations. In her article \u201cWriting on Our Walls,\u201d Marisa Gomez, editor of the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform<\/em>, says, \u201cDifferent motivations drive different types of graffiti, and graffiti cannot be understood or controlled without an understanding of the motivations behind its creation\u201d (634). According to Gomez, because artists\u2019 motivations distinguish graffiti art from vandalism, they are extremely important when seeking to understand street art. In \u201c\u2019Our Desires Are Ungovernable\u2019: Writing Graffiti in Urban Space,\u201d Dr. Mark Halsey and Professor Alison Young consider some of these motivations, which they call \u201cthe hitherto hidden aspects of graffiti culture.\u201d They argue that graffiti is, first and foremost, about pleasure\u2014whether the emotional pleasure of expressing oneself in a public place, or simply the physical pleasure of holding a can of spray paint (276). They explain that, initially, motivations for street art included its aesthetic appeal and shared peer activity. However, as this art continued, its motivations began to include pride, pleasure, and recognition. Ultimately, street art is a form of \u201cIdentity Art\u201d which reflects the motivations of its creators (Fine 155).<\/p>\n

By definition, then, street art seems to be authentic\u2014and, indeed, one of Banksy\u2019s main focuses in Exit<\/em> is to establish it as such. After a brief background into Guetta\u2019s life prior to the film, Banksy shows him as he starts to film street artists, beginning with his cousin, \u201cSpace Invader.\u201d Guetta documents the street artist\u2019s work incessantly and starts to follow the paths of other artists like Shepard Fairey\u2014best known for his Obama campaign poster\u2014and Borf. These stories of real street artists, who have perfected their craft, emphasize to the viewer Banksy\u2019s appreciation for street artists like himself, who have spent years and years developing their own styles and devoting their time to expressing themselves. This characteristic of street art\u2014true self-expression on the part of the artist\u2014is what makes much of it authentic, according to Banksy.<\/p>\n

However, although Banksy argues in favor of the authenticity of art made by street artists like him, he calls into question Guetta\u2019s art. While we enjoy secret shots of other street artists at work, Banksy creates an atmosphere of contempt surrounding Guetta, the filmmaker. Each time Guetta pushes his camera into the face of a celebrity or artist at work, we cringe. Tacky music plays as Guetta talks about how he wants to record every second possible, and Banksy includes a testimonial from the videographer\u2019s wife about how Guetta privileges his filming over his family: \u201cWe worry, but he doesn\u2019t care. We need him. He doesn\u2019t think!\u201d We\u2019re similarly overcome with discomfort as Guetta begins to plaster all over town drawings of himself holding a camera, copying the styles of Banksy and the street artists he has followed for so long. We wonder if Guetta is doing this for fame or for self-expression. At this moment, we begin to understand Banksy\u2019s point of view: not all street art is authentic.<\/p>\n

Another point that Banksy raises about the question of authenticity is street artists\u2019 emotional motivations. One example of this theme is the street artist Borf, whom Guetta interviews early in the film. Borf explains that his art is in memory of his late best friend, and it holds great emotional value to him. Laidtka points out that, since emotions are such a critical reflection of self, they are important to consider when judging authenticity:<\/p>\n

\n

Social psychologists\u2026emphasize the role emotion plays in their discussions of authenticity. Because of the primary role that self-knowledge plays in uncovering the authentic self, emotions are seen as delivering critical messages to the cognitive mind about the self\u2019s true state. For them, such \u2018\u2018undistorted perception of immediate psychological reality\u2019\u2019 serves as the foundation of the authentic. (239)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words, because emotions are such basic indicators of self and identity, they reflect authenticity. The emotion of pleasure, one of the primary motivations behind graffiti, seems to speak to street art\u2019s authenticity. However, Banksy\u2019s opinion differs with that of Laidtka. Guetta clearly has emotional motivations, mainly that of pleasure, as he pastes those printouts and stickers that show him holding his camera. However, Banksy still calls into question the authenticity of Guetta\u2019s art. He believes that merely the artist\u2019s pleasure while creating art does not make it authentic; there must be something more that establishes its authenticity.<\/p>\n

In his article \u201cCrafting Authenticity: The Validation of Authenticity in Self-Taught Art,\u201d Gary Allan Fine, an American sociologist and author, explores how self-taught artists\u2019 identities affect their art. Especially relevant is his discussion on how authenticity is bestowed and, specifically, how an artist\u2019s personal legitimacy is used to support his artwork\u2019s aesthetic authenticity in the minds of the cultural elite. This idea is specifically referenced in relation to an artist\u2019s biography. Fine says that, in addition to motivation and inspiration, artists\u2019 biographies prove the authenticity of their work:<\/p>\n

\n

Closely tied to the motivations and inspirations of artists are the presentations of their biographies. The biographies of self-taught artists justify their authenticity, serving as a primary criterion of evaluation. To be sure, the work itself matters, as many people have interesting biographies, but the biography invests the material with meaning. (162\u20133)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words, the biography and experience of an artist, not just his motivations, define the authenticity of his art, and an artist\u2019s background gives his work meaning. Banksy\u2019s biography, and those of the other street artists that the film follows, is lengthy. However, Guetta\u2019s biography, as an artist, is a short one. Prior to his work as a street artist, he was a videographer with hardly an artistic desire, but now he suddenly rises to prominence. Banksy objects to Guetta\u2019s lack of artistic experience; this, he claims, is an important part of an artist\u2019s identity and must be taken into account when we judge the authenticity of his work.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, Banksy feels as if he and other street artists have been cheated. And it only gets worse, as Guetta (or Mr. Brainwash, as he begins calling himself) becomes famous and opens an enormous art show in Los Angeles (called \u201cLife is Beautiful\u201d), making almost one million dollars on an artistic style that he has developed in almost no time at all. One art enthusiast at the show says of Guetta\u2019s art, \u201cIt\u2019s a triumph, it will go down in history\u2014I\u2019m glad my friends turned me on to this.\u201d All the glowing praise of Guetta\u2019s artwork, according to Banksy, just shows how eager we can be to believe in an art piece\u2019s authenticity. Mr. Brainwash, Banksy claims, is nothing but a hoax\u2014he\u2019s in it for the money and the fame. As critic Peter DeBruge says, \u201cClearly, Banksy’s big beef with the contempo art scene is the idea of selling out. Like many modern artists, Banksy began as a renegade, whereas Guetta aims straight for the iconic status of guys like Andy Warhol and Salvador Dali\u201d (28).<\/p>\n

Authenticity vs. Entertainment<\/h4>\n

The fact that Guetta succeeds so easily in the art world raises questions about Banksy\u2019s film itself: Is it real? Is it authentic<\/em>? Many reviewers suggest that the film is just an elaborate, if entertaining, hoax\u2014a \u201cprankumentary\u201d\u2014created by Banksy to get artists and art critics alike to reconsider their methods for placing value on artwork. Not only does Banksy address this issue through the events of the film, but he uses a new artistic medium, the documentary itself, as well.<\/p>\n

A central problem of the documentary form is the question of authenticity versus entertainment; in the same way that collectors desire authentic artwork, we desire an authentic experience when we watch a documentary. As Barry Grant says in his book Documenting the Documentary: Close Readings of Documentary Film and Video<\/em>, \u201cThe question of the performative has always dogged documentary. Traditional wisdom maintains that one should not stage or imitate reality; instead, the documentary filmmaker is supposed to capture it\u201d (429). In other words, we don\u2019t want a fake, or a copy: we want to watch a film that authentically<\/em> captures reality\u2014a film that is true to the event it depicts. However, reality is, in fact, boring. What we ultimately desire, then, is an experience that is authentic to us<\/em>: relevant, interesting, and<\/em> true. Yet we are so quick to believe in the authenticity of Exit<\/em> that we ignore its hints of artificiality\u2014namely, the success of the bumbling and easily distracted Guetta seems too coincidental\u2014and believe that it actually happened. By the end of the film, it seems that Bansky has played a trick on us: the authenticity of the film itself is called into question. Banksy is drawing a parallel between our approach to visual art and our approach to his film. In the same way that our eagerness to bestow authenticity on Exit<\/em> causes us to miss the point of the film, our eagerness to call art authentic results in the success of sellouts like Guetta.<\/p>\n

Concluding Thoughts<\/h4>\n

If Banksy has created his ultimate hoax in this film, there\u2019s no way to know for sure because, as he avows in interviews, it\u2019s a true story. However, if Guetta\u2019s career was just an elaborately created, filmed prank, it takes Banksy\u2019s questions to a whole new level: essentially, he calls on us to question the way we evaluate art. He illustrates that, just as our desire for an authentic experience when we watch a documentary influences us to place value on what may only be a complicated hoax, our desire for authenticity in art influences us to sometimes ascribe value to objects that we probably shouldn\u2019t. At the end of the film, in Banksy\u2019s last interview, he mentions one of the consequences of placing value on inauthentic art: its influence on other artists:<\/p>\n

\n

I don’t think Thierry played by the rules, in some ways, but then . . . there aren’t supposed to be any rules. So I don’t really know what the moral is. I mean . . . I used to encourage everyone I met to make art. I used to think everyone should do it. I don’t really do that so much any more.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words, because of modern standards for art evaluation, people like Guetta stifle the creativity and motivation of other artists because they rise so quickly\u2014and yet their art isn\u2019t authentic. Banksy has been led to question even his own art as a result of Guetta\u2019s fame, and he no longer encourages other artists. Banksy alludes to these consequences but doesn\u2019t come up with a concrete answer: \u201cI don\u2019t know what it means, Thierry’s huge success and arrival in the art world. Maybe it means Thierry was a genius all along, maybe it means he got a bit lucky. Maybe art is all a big joke.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, this somewhat disappointing conclusion doesn\u2019t take away from the importance of the issues that Banksy raises. He has influenced us to consider why we call a piece of art authentic and how that affects the livelihoods of other artists. In an increasingly changing fine arts culture where it seems as though artists learn the rules to break them, it is becoming more and more important for us to assess our standards for art evaluation, especially in the context of our quest for authenticity. This assessment may well affect the vitality of street artists\u2014and all artists\u2014for decades to come.<\/p>\n

Works Cited<\/h2>\n

Debruge, Peter. \u201cExit Through the Gift Shop.\u201d Variety<\/em>. 15\u201321 Feb. 2010: 28. Web.<\/p>\n

Erickson, Rebecca. \u201cThe Importance of Authenticity for Self and Society.\u201d Symbolic Interaction<\/em> 18.2 (Summer 1995): 121\u201341. Print.<\/p>\n

Exit Through the Gift Shop<\/em>. Dir. Banksy. Paranoid Pictures, 2010. Netflix. Web. 29 April 2011.<\/p>\n

Fine, Gary Allan. \u201cCrafting Authenticity: The Validation of Authenticity in Self-Taught Art.\u201d Theory and Society<\/em> 32.2 (April 2003): 153\u201380. Web.<\/p>\n

Gomez, Marisa A. \u201cThe Writing On Our Walls: Finding Solutions Through Distinguishing Graffiti Art From Graffiti Vandalism.\u201d University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform<\/em> 26 (Spring 1993): 633\u2013707.\u00a0Web.<\/p>\n

Grant, Barry. Documenting the Documentary: Close Readings of Documentary Film and Video<\/em>. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1998. Print.<\/p>\n

Halsey, Mark and Alison Young. \u201c\u2019Our Desires Are Ungovernable\u2019: Writing Graffiti in Urban Space.\u201d Theoretical Criminology<\/em> 10 (2006): 275\u2013306. Web.<\/p>\n

Leidtka, Jean. \u201cStrategy Making and the Search for Authenticity.\u201d Journal of Business Ethics<\/em> 80 (2008): 237\u201348. Web.<\/p>\n

Phillips, David. Exhibiting Authenticity<\/em>. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. Print.<\/p>\n

Shiner, Larry. \u201c\u2019Primitive Fakes,\u2019 \u2018Tourist Art,\u2019 and the Ideology of Authenticity.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism<\/em> 52.2 (Spring 1994): 225\u201334. Web.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ethan DuBois (WR 150, Paper 3) Read the instructor’s introduction Download this essay Many in our modern culture have become concerned with the idea of authenticity. Some argue that we have lost our sense of authenticity and can no longer find a \u201ccenter of self\u201d (Erickson 122). This argument about authenticity is of special interest […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4801,"featured_media":0,"parent":3740,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3768"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4801"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3768"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3768\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4063,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3768\/revisions\/4063"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/writingprogram\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}