Staff Awards Nomination.

Think. Teach. Do. Awards Nomination Form

  • Nominator

  • Nominee

  • The Think. Award will be presented to an individual who has demonstrated exceptional innovation in research activities, program development, or the creation/implementation of tools and systems that dramatically improve a process. This staff member’s effort advances the strategic priorities of SPH.

    The Teach. Award will be presented to an individual whose collaborative work has had a positive impact within the SPH community. They may have taken ownership of key concerns and needs, acted on opportunities, solved problems, or brought people and resources together to make processes more efficient/accessible.

    The Do. Award will be presented to an individual who has created extensive opportunities for others to build community and make connections through programs, policies, and/or spaces. These efforts should honor the experiences of various populations and reflect the School’s core purpose to spark social change, foster a sense of belonging, and build relationships across differences.

    Review Committee Rubric

    Outstanding (3) Meets (2) Limited (1)
    Nominator provided specific and measurable examples of the nominee's excellence in the project/activity, far exceeding the criteria of the nominee's current job role. The documentation illustrates the nominee's superior contribution(s). Nominator provided specific and measurable examples of the nominee's excellence in the project/activity that meets the criteria of the nominee's current job role. The documentation provided illustrates the nominee's contribution(s). Nominator provided limited information and description of the nominee's excellence within the project/activity. The documentation provided was insufficient or vague.

    Questions to consider:

    • How does the nominee’s work performance go above and beyond the call of duty? Please provide specific examples.
    • What are the nominee’s significant contributions? Please provide specific examples explaining the situation, action taken and outcome.
    • How did the nominee’s efforts contribute to the department or university?
  • Please describe how the nominee fulfills the criteria (in 500 words or fewer).
  • You are also encouraged to submit relevant documentation to support this nomination.
    Drop files here or
    Max. file size: 100 MB, Max. files: 3.