{"id":1425,"date":"2021-05-24T09:00:42","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T13:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/?p=1425"},"modified":"2021-05-22T21:10:21","modified_gmt":"2021-05-23T01:10:21","slug":"a-historical-perspective-on-the-japanese-keiretsu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/2021\/05\/24\/a-historical-perspective-on-the-japanese-keiretsu\/","title":{"rendered":"A Historical Perspective on the Japanese Keiretsu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By: Sarah Klim, RBFL Student Editor<\/p>\n<p>In the U.S., a corporation is made up of many different constituencies, often including its shareholders, managers, creditors, and employees. Most large companies are publicly-traded and widely-held. Large institutional investors, such as Vanguard and Fidelity, are also common. The majority of shareholders are typically not managers, although management may own some shares in the company. In turn, this can create costs associated with separating ownership and control.<\/p>\n<p>In stark comparison to the U.S., the predominate shareholding structure in Japan has traditionally been the <em>keiretsu<\/em>, or families of companies that have invested in one another.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\"><span>[1]<\/span><\/a> There are two predominant varieties of the <em>keiretsu<\/em>: horizontal and vertical. In the horizontal <em>keiretsu<\/em>, dozens of companies in different industries own shares in one another, with a major financial institution at the center. The Studies in Systems, Decisions and Control book series has provided an excellent diagram of this type of cross-ownership group (Figure 1, below).<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\"><sup>[2]<\/sup><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/rbfl\/files\/2021\/05\/Picture1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"287\" height=\"207\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1426\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In the vertical <em>keiretsu<\/em>, large companies (often associated with the automotive industry) own shares in manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors.<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\"><span>[3]<\/span><\/a> The Studies in Systems, Decisions and Control book series has again provided an excellent diagram of the vertical <em>keiretsu <\/em>(Figure 2, below).<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\"><span>[4]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/rbfl\/files\/2021\/05\/Picture2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"297\" height=\"141\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1427\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Japan and the U.S. developed drastically different predominant ownership structures due to their distinct corporate histories. Prior to World War II, the Japanese economy was dominated by the <em>zaibatsu<\/em>, or \u201cfinancial cliques\u201d run by wealthy families who controlled massive business groups financed by major banks.<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\"><span>[5]<\/span><\/a> After the War, Occupation authorities enacted regulations in an effort to \u201cdemocratize\u201d Japan and dissolve the <em>zaibatsu<\/em>. Ultimately, these regulations were relaxed as the political and economic landscape shifted once again and the U.S. turned to Japan for supplies during the Korean War. The <em>zaibatsu<\/em> reestablished their cross-shareholdings, forming the modern <em>keiretsu<\/em> we see today.<\/p>\n<p>Subsequently, Japan emerged from the destruction of World War II to rapidly become the world\u2019s second-largest economic superpower (after the U.S.), in what was dubbed an \u201cEconomic Miracle.\u201d Western observers credited this unprecedented transformation, at least in part, to the <em>keiretsu<\/em>, which allowed \u201cindividual companies to gain financial strength and connections necessary to undercut foreign and domestic rivals\u201d and \u201cgain market share rather than accumulate short-term profits, and \u2026 aggressively enter[] high-growth sectors with long-term potential.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\"><span>[6]<\/span><\/a> Unfortunately, Japan\u2019s economy swelled into a bubble in the 1980s which ultimately burst in the 1990s, leading to a decades-long economic stagnation Japan\u2019s press termed, \u201cThe Lost Decades.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an effort to counteract the downturn, Japan enacted significant economic and regulatory changes which stressed the viability of the <em>keiretsu <\/em>for the first time, including threatening the <em>keiretsu<\/em>\u2019s close banking ties, globalizing the financial markets, and deregulating the Japanese securities markets.<a href=\"#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\"><span>[7]<\/span><\/a> Nevertheless, in 2003 researchers found \u201clittle evidence that economic and regulatory changes in the early 1990s influenced the Japanese inter-corporate network, and in particular <em>keiretsu<\/em> organization,\u201d suggesting that economic efficiency and effectiveness incentives alone could not dismantle the <em>keiretsu<\/em>\u2019s cross-held shares.<a href=\"#_ftn8\" name=\"_ftnref8\"><span>[8]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The next major threat to the <em>keiretsu <\/em>came in the 2000s in the form of sweeping corporate governance reform. Critics of the <em>keiretsu<\/em> have long-argued that cross-shareholdings lead to \u201cnotoriously poor\u201d corporate governance characterized by entrenched and underperforming management, excessive corporate loyalty bias (i.e., when faced with a problem, corporations may choose a familial choice over an economic or rational solution), and excessive group think that has occasionally led to scandal and fraud.<a href=\"#_ftn9\" name=\"_ftnref9\"><span>[9]<\/span><\/a> In particular, foreign and institutional investors have pressured companies to reduce or sell-off their cross-shareholdings. In light of these circumstances, both Japan\u2019s revised Corporate Governance Code and Stewardship Code adopted a \u201ccomply or explain\u201d based approach, mandating that companies either reduce cross-shareholdings, or explain their economic rationale for failing to do so.<a href=\"#_ftn10\" name=\"_ftnref10\"><span>[10]<\/span><\/a> The results have been dramatic \u2014 cross-held shares dropped to less than 10% of all holdings for the first time in 2017<a href=\"#_ftn11\" name=\"_ftnref11\"><span>[11]<\/span><\/a>, and the Tokyo Stock Exchange speculates that this trend will continue.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, the <em>keiretsu<\/em> are no longer the predominant ownership structure in Japan, and are on-track to disappearing altogether. Although the <em>keiretsu<\/em> have deep historical roots in Japanese corporate history (stemming from the pre-War <em>zaibatsu<\/em>), helped the country experience an \u201cEconomic Miracle\u201d in the mid-to-late 20<sup>th<\/sup> century, and have several benefits, moves to reduce cross-shareholdings will likely accelerate due to continued corporate governance reform, increasing pressure by foreign and institutional investors, and the enhancement of disclosures in securities reports.<a href=\"#_ftn12\" name=\"_ftnref12\"><span>[12]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\"><span>[1]<\/span><\/a> Ken Auletta, <em>American Keiretsu<\/em>, The New Yorker (Oct. 13, 1997), https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/magazine\/1997\/10\/20\/american-keiretsu.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\"><span>[2]<\/span><\/a> Peter Simon Sapaty, <em>Real Network Processing Examples, in <\/em>Holistic Analysis and Management of Distributed Social Systems 137, 138 (2018).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\"><span>[3]<\/span><\/a> James R. Lincoln, et al., <em>Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan<\/em>,\u00a061 Am. Socio. Rev. 67, 68 (1996).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\"><span>[4]<\/span><\/a> Sapaty, s<em>upra <\/em>note 2, at 139.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\"><span>[5]<\/span><\/a> David Flath, <em>Shareholding in the Keiretsu, Japan&#8217;s Financial Groups<\/em>, 75 Rev. Econ. &amp; Stat.\u00a0249,249 (1993).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\"><span>[6]<\/span><\/a> Robert J. Crawford, <em>Reinterpreting the Japanese Economic Miracle<\/em>, Harv. Bus. Rev. (Jan.\u2013Feb. 1998), <a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/1998\/01\/reinterpreting-the-japanese-economic-miracle\">https:\/\/hbr.org\/1998\/01\/reinterpreting-the-japanese-economic-miracle<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\"><span>[7]<\/span><\/a> J. McGuire &amp; S. Dow, <em>The Persistence and Implications of Japanese Keiretsu Organization<\/em>,\u00a034 J. Int\u2019L. Bus. Stud.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>374, 374 (2003).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref8\" name=\"_ftn8\"><span>[8]<\/span><\/a> <em>Id.<\/em> at 384.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref9\" name=\"_ftn9\"><span>[9]<\/span><\/a> <em>See <\/em>Ken Kobayashi,\u00a0<em>Effects of Japanese Financial Regulations and Keiretsu Style Groups on Japanese Corporate Governance<\/em>, 43 Hastings\u00a0Int&#8217;l &amp;\u00a0Comp.\u00a0L. Rev. 339, 356 (2020).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref10\" name=\"_ftn10\"><span>[10]<\/span><\/a> Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., TSE-Listed Companies White Paper on Corporate Governance 24-25 (2019).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref11\" name=\"_ftn11\"><span>[11]<\/span><\/a> Shinya Oshino, <em>Japan\u2019s Cross-Held Shares Fall Below 10% of All Holdings<\/em>, Nikkei Asia (July 16, 2017), <a href=\"https:\/\/asia.nikkei.com\/Business\/Japan-s-cross-held-shares-fall-below-10-of-all-holdings2\">https:\/\/asia.nikkei.com\/Business\/Japan-s-cross-held-shares-fall-below-10-of-all-holdings2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref12\" name=\"_ftn12\"><span>[12]<\/span><\/a> Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., <em>supra <\/em>note 10, at 35.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Sarah Klim, RBFL Student Editor In the U.S., a corporation is made up of many different constituencies, often including its shareholders, managers, creditors, and employees. Most large companies are publicly-traded and widely-held. Large institutional investors, such as Vanguard and Fidelity, are also common. The majority of shareholders are typically not managers, although management may [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17548,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1425"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17548"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1425"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1425\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1428,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1425\/revisions\/1428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/rbfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}