Boston University School of Law

Legal History: The Year Books

Record Detail

 
Previous Record Next Record
Seipp Number:
Year
Court
Writ
Marginal Heading
1424.072abr 1424 Debt on an obligation
Term
Regnal Year
King: Plea Number Folio Number
Mich. 3 Hen. 6 Fitzherbert Verdict 3 226r
Serjeants/ Justices Plaintiff Surname Plaintiff First Name v. Defendent Surname Defendent First Name
Other Plaintiffs Other Names Places Other Defendents
Abridgements Cross-References Statutes
Fitzherbert Verdict 3  45 Edw. 3, Fitzherbert Estoppel, on verdicts   
Incipit (First Line) Number of Lines
Det sur obligation le defendant dit que il fuit lay home et nient lettre et fuit lie a luy en lieu dacquittance & issint 5
Process and Pleading
Defendant pleaded that he was a layman and illiterate and it (the obligation) was read to him in lieu of acquittance and thus was not his deed.
The inquest (jury) said that defendant knew well that it was an obligation and that defendant was obliged in the same sum and that it was his own will to be thus obliged.
All the Court held clearly that this was no verdict, but the inquest ought to say whether it be defendant's deed or not.
The jurors were compelled to do this, so they said that it was defendant's deed.
Language Notes (Law French)
Abstract Context
Commentary & Paraphrase
see of verdicts good matter 45 Edw. 3, in the title Estoppel
Manuscripts Mss Notes Editing Notes Errors
Translations/Editions
Plea Roll Record Year Record Plaintiffs Record Defendants Last Update
0 2002-06-23
Keywords
Obligation
Lay Man
Layman
Illiterate
Illiteracy
Letters
Reading
In Lieu Of
Acquittance
Not His Deed
Inquest
Knowledge
Sum
Will (volunte)
Holding
Clarity
Verdict
Precision
Deed
Juror
Compulsion
Matter
Estoppel
Previous Record Next Record

Return to Search