| 1372.082 |
1372 |
|
Formedon |
Formedon
Briefe |
| Mich. |
46 |
Edw. 3 |
14 |
26b-27a |
Tauke, William Sjt Tanke (for D)
Hanmer, David Sjt Hamun (for P)
Fyncheden, William de CJCP FInchden
Hasty, Henry de Sjt (for P)
Fyncheden, William de CJCP Finch
Hanmer, David Sjt
Percy, Henry Sjt Percy (for D)
Hanmer, David Sjt Hamun |
Penros |
J. |
|
|
| Penros, wife of J. |
|
Churleber', manor of |
|
Fitzherbert Briefe 604 (not 60)
not Brooke Formedon 77 |
|
|
| Formedon fuit port per J. Penros & sa feme, vers Nicholas Wantesford, &c. & demaunde le manour de |
13 |
| Formedon was brought by J. Penros and his wife against Nicholas Wantesford etc., and demanded the manor of Churleber', and a house, 20 acres of land, and a mill. The defendant said that, whereas he demanded a manor, a house, 20 acres of land, and a mill, the house, 20 acres of land, and the mill were the manor, so he demanded one thing twice; judgment of the writ. The plaintiffs said that this was only nontenure of a parcel, so that they prayed that the defendant answer to the rest. Fyncheden CJCP said that the challenge went to the whole writ; therefore he told the plaintiffs to answer. The plaintiffs said that the house, mill, and 20 acres of land were not the whole manor, as the defendant supposed; ready to aver. Fyncheden CJCP said that the issue in that manner was not receivable, because it could be that less made the manor, or more, so it was necessary for the plaintiffs to say, not parcel, or to say that what they demanded was a manor besides the house, mill, and land. The plaintiffs said that, as broadly as he took the writ, so broadly they had answered. And then he was charged to answer in particular (especial), that what he demanded was a manor, and the house, mill and land besides that. The defendant said that it was a parcel, and demanded judgment of the writ. The plaintiff prayed that the defendant answer to the rest. |
|
