This page represents the final installment of the Boston University International Law Journal<\/i>‘s\u00a0three-part series concerning Professor Allen’s proposed reforms to the Tanzania Evidence Act.\u00a0 Upon submitting the final draft of his proposed evidence code and report to the Law Reform Commission of Tanzania for consideration, Professor Allen and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law hosted a conference on evidence law reform in developing countries.\u00a0 Conference participants were invited to submit articles on evidence law reform for publication in the second issue of ILJ<\/i>‘s 33rd volume (2015).\u00a0 The ILJ<\/i> selected four articles for publication from the conference, which, along with Professor Allen’s proposed code and report, may be found below. The other papers that were submitted for discussion at the conference have also been posted. Finally, this page includes Professor Allen’s two prior publications with the ILJ<\/i> on evidence reform in Tanzania.<\/p>\n
It has been an honor to publish the works of Professor Allen and his team over these past three years. We at the ILJ<\/i> hope that this page commemorating Professor Allen and his team’s reform efforts provides readers with meaningful insight into the complex process of evidence reform in Tanzania.<\/p>\n Proposed Final Draft: Tanzania Evidence Act 2014 from the Chief Consultant and Drafting Committee<\/a> 33\u00a0B.U. Int’l L.J.<\/span> 283-394 (2015).<\/em><\/p>\n Introduction<\/a> Delinking the Law of Evidence of Tanzania from Its Indian Ancestry<\/a> An Eclectic Paradigm in the Law of Evidence and Its Reform in Tanzania: Competency of a Child Witness<\/a> Exporting the Hearsay Provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence<\/a> Are the Federal Rules of Evidence Dynamite?<\/a> A Proposed Evidence Law<\/a> (Note: These papers have not been through the\u00a0ILJ<\/em>\u00a0formal editorial review process.\u00a0 Sole responsibility for the content of these papers remains with the authors.)<\/p>\n Thinking Beyond the Federal Rules<\/a> The Foundations of the Law of Evidence and Their Implications for Developing Countries: The Background of the Tanzania Law of Evidence Project<\/a> The Conceptual Challenge of Procedural Reforms in Latin America<\/a> Why Chinese Witnesses Do Not Testify at Trial in Criminal Proceedings<\/a> Reflecting on Development of Evidence Law in China<\/a> Practical Basis of Evidence Legislation in China<\/a>Proposed Final Draft: Tanzania Evidence Act 2014<\/em><\/h3>\n
\nRonald J. Allen
\nMay 7, 2014<\/p>\nReforming the Law of Evidence of Tanzania (Part Three): The Foundations of the Law of Evidence and Their Implications for Developing Countries<\/em><\/h3>\n
\nRonald J. Allen
\nPage 283<\/em><\/p>\n
\nIbrahim H. Juma
\nPage 297<\/em><\/p>\n
\nMohamed Chande Othman
\nPage 313<\/em><\/p>\n
\nRoger C. Park
\nPage 327<\/em><\/p>\n
\nStephan Landsman
\nPage 343<\/em><\/p>\n
\nRonald J. Allen
\nPage\u00a0 359<\/em><\/p>\nAdditional Papers Submitted for the Conference<\/em><\/h3>\n
\nEdward K. Cheng<\/p>\n
\nDr. Edward G. Hoseah<\/p>\n
\nOri\u00f3n Vargas<\/p>\n
\nZhuhao Wang<\/p>\n
\nBaosheng Zhang<\/p>\n
\nZhong Zhang<\/p>\nReforming the Law of Evidence of Tanzania: Parts One and Two<\/em><\/h3>\n