Trade, Investment + Climate

In 2016, the Global Economic Governance Initiative at the GDP Center teamed with the Georgetown University Law Center’s Harrison Institute for Public Law to convene an interdisciplinary working group to examine the extent to which the World Trade Organization (WTO), free trade agreements (FTAs) and international investment agreements (IIAs) are compatible with climate change goals. The group found that the trading regime in general, and United States-led FTAs and IIAs in particular, are in tension with the goal of aggressively reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the policies necessary for achieving this goal. The working group identified two core areas where the current model is incompatible with aggressive climate action: (1) Trade and investment agreements tend to increases greenhouse gas emissions and (2) Trade and investment rules can undermine climate policies and impose limits on government regulatory authority.

The WTO made a promising start toward addressing the implications of trade rules for climate change in 2007 when it collaborated with the United Nations Environmental Programme on a study on trade and climate change which concluded, inter alia, that trade liberalization “most likely lead(s) to increased CO2 emissions.” Unfortunately, governments have done little to promote consistency between the trade regime and climate policy, and in some instances have actually taken aggressive steps to avoid any consideration of climate in trade negotiations. The United States, for example, eliminated references to climate change from the text of the TransPacific Partnership and does not consider climate change in its environmental reviews of trade agreements.

Research Highlight

Latest News & Publications

View more GEGI publications