Departments
|
![]() Feature
Article As Time Goes By Rick and Ilsa recast in COM professor's novel treatmentBy Amy E. Dean "The opportunity to tackle the Holy Grail of sequels wasn't on my agenda, to say the least," writes Michael Walsh, College of Communication visiting professor of journalism and visiting fellow of The University Professors, in the October 11 New York Times. With his sequel novel to the 1942 film Casablanca now a month into release, Walsh has garnered both praise and intense criticism for As Time Goes By. Sometimes sequels work, but more often than not they fail to capture the magic of the original. Revisiting success is risky business, and it becomes even harder when the original ranks number two on the American Film Institute's list of the 100 best American films ever made and has a cast that includes Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henreid, Claude Rains, Conrad Veidt, Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre, and Dooley Wilson. But Walsh wasn't intimidated at the prospect of continuing a classic story. "Sequels are an old and honored literary tradition," he says. "For example, there has been a variety of treatments of the Don Juan myth, such as Mozart's Don Giovanni." Standing alone After finishing Walsh's book, some readers find that the movie Casablanca is fuller and richer because the characters' secrets are finally unlocked, revealing the sources of their anguish, anger, and c'est-la-vie attitude. Jeannie Williams of USA Today points out that the depth of characterization that Walsh brings to his novel helps one understand not only why these people have ended up in Casablanca, but why they are who they are. ". . . Ilsa's character expands," she writes, "Sam the piano man has a bigger part, and we learn of Rick's mysterious past as a Jewish gangster in New York."
Renault: The plane to Lisbon. You would like to be on
it. "Whatever happened to Rick is beyond comprehension," Walsh says. "It doesn't just come from a broken love affair. He's a very tough character, but he's lost his whole life. He can't go back to America." Not-nice Jewish boy "Back in Casablanca," she said, "I asked you to do the thinking for both us. I was a different person then. I didn't know what I wanted; I didn't know my own mind. I do now. When we parted the last time, it was on your terms, Richard. Now, we part on mine." "I wanted to make Ilsa more active," says Walsh. "I had an editor -- a woman -- and we worked together to make her a less passive character. Remember, she's been dragged from pillar to post for over 18 months, plus being on the run in France. I wanted her not to be dragged around anymore." Walsh insists that the whole notion of Casablanca as a romantic movie -- a love story -- isn't accurate. "The cult fans have got it absolutely wrong," he says. In the movie, Casablanca is never portrayed as a place where people can find happiness, but a place they seek to escape no matter what the cost, where the innocent are rounded up and shot in cold blood. "In the original theatrical trailer, not seen by moviegoers," explains Walsh, "there are three scenes of gunplay, including the scene where Rick shoots Major Strasser at the airport. Rick is not an idealistic, drunken soul; he's not a nice guy; and he's very willing to use his gun." Walsh reunites the main characters from Casablanca in As Time Goes By in an on-the-edge, against-all-odds wartime assassination plot, and romance still figures into the formula. Sui genres Sometimes, however, it's a really bad idea to create a sequel -- especially since it's impossible to please the purists. "Fans of Casablanca won't find that old Hollywood magic in this lackluster sequel," writes a Woodsfield, Ohio, reader to amazon.com's online book review Web page. But most readers in this "customer comments" section seem to appreciate having a new way of looking at an old and cherished classic: "The book kept me reading well into the night and was worth every minute," writes one from Richmond, Va. "If the author has one wish for As Time Goes By," writes Walsh in the New York Times, "it is this: that when the reader is finished, he or she will find that the film has been enhanced, not diminished; that while some of the screenplay's most intriguing mysteries might have been removed (or cleared up), others have popped up to take their place. I won't tell you who dies and who lives to love again, but I will tell you this: we'll always, all of us, have Paris." |