Departments
|
![]() Feature Article Making Life Work Safe surfing is every parent's responsibilityBy Amy E. Dean The headlines and news stories about the dangers to children that lurk in the depths of the vast ocean of Internet information and communication are enough to terrify any parent. Only recently, for example, the FBI warned parents that Internet pedophiles are a serious threat, a package bomb killed a 17-year-old boy over an Internet deal gone bad, and a teenager was charged with computer crime after knocking out communications to the tower at Worcester Regional Airport. But Internet-produced bombs are rare, and protecting your children from e-mail exchanges with pedophiles is easy (see sidebar). What is much harder is ensuring that your child surfs in clean, safe waters that use decent language, promote nonviolent themes, and are devoid of enticements unsuitable for children. Today the battle rages over Internet decency and how to keep the Web clean. When Congress passed the Internet censorship law known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA) in 1996, many companies, advocacy groups, and individuals with a stake in the Internet challenged the measure in court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the CDA unconstitutional. Today a bitter battle is being raged over the White House-backed effort to develop a rating and labeling system for the Internet. On one side are the big mainstream Internet and computer companies, led by America Online (AOL) and Microsoft, which proclaim an eagerness to make cyberspace safe for families. Lined up against them are free-speech advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Library Association, which see ratings systems as censorship tools. But no matter who is on what side of the issue, two critical factors dominate discussions of any online rating system. First, the debate over ratings begins with a technology called PICS (Platform for Internet Content), a mechanism for labeling Web pages according to their content. The labels can be read by a software program that in turn can block access to sites with specific types of content. PICS itself is not a ratings system, but rather a method for implementing a ratings system. The theory is that once PICS is in place throughout the Internet, a multiplicity of ratings systems would emerge. This is where the idea of ratings becomes arbitrary, inconsistent, and for parents, unreliable. For example, a Christian Coalition group might block access to anything that discusses homosexuality or abortion online; a news organization such as CNN, however, would not. The dilemma is that what is being sold as a voluntary system will include a multiplicity of ratings systems that are going to be quite complicated and may promote a bias not shared by a parent. Second, the Internet is simply too big, too diverse, and too fast-changing to be tamed by even a semivoluntary ratings mechanism. Although AOL Chairman Steve Case believes that "nothing is as important as making this medium family-friendly," AOL owes much of its success to its sex-chat rooms. Web sites that decline to rate their pages, major search services such as Yahoo! that would be asked not to index unrated or "undesirable" sites, and international Web services that would be faced with the choice of adopting a U.S. labeling system or forgoing access to U.S. users further complicate the issue of ratings. What all this means is that parents need to be more vigilant in ensuring their children's safe use of the Internet. The power to access information all over the world by a simple point and click exposes children to news groups, the World Wide Web, e-mail, and real-time conversational chat rooms known as IRCs (Inter-net Request Chat). Alternative news groups abound on the Internet, and although most offer adult content and are not moderated, there are beneficial groups among them. For example, there are "alt. sex" groups as well as "alt.algebra.help" groups. To filter every alternative group out means loss of beneficial ones. "I am proactive," says Ray Gasser about the Internet. Gasser, a graduate student working on his Ph.D. in the CAS computer science department, where he is the research lab manager, thinks the Internet is an incredible resource. "Instead of trying to stop, control, or censor this technology, people might try to take the initiative and focus their attention on improving the Internet, making it a better experience for everyone." This can happen when parents help their children on initial forays, or more commonly, when children take their parents along for an instructional ride. "I took my mother to the Louvre on the Internet," says Gasser. "We looked at paintings together, then printed out one she liked. When she went to France on a vacation, she found a print of the picture and purchased it. "I really feel that the Web is the future of education," says Gasser. "After watching an A&E [Arts & Entertainment cable TV channel] special on influenza, I spent over two hours surfing the A&E and other Web sites learning about influenza and then about other viruses. It is this freedom to explore and interact with the information that makes learning fun and powerful. I love the Web." There are always dangers with information -- it can be misused as well as used. But according to Gasser, there are several excellent software packages to help parents filter what can be seen from, as well as sent onto, the Internet. Keyword screening, for example, is one technique used by these packages to prevent access to sites containing certain restricted keywords, such as sex. It can also be used to prevent children from divulging personal information, such as name and address, onto the Internet. These software packages can be used to restrict young children's Web access to a list of parent-approved sites such as Sesame Street; for older children, access can be opened to all sites except certain restricted adult ones. In addition, the times when children can use the Internet can be restricted, such as when a parent is home. And finally, a logging of which sites have been accessed by their children can be used by parents to keep track of where their children go on the Internet. Begun in the 1960s, the Internet grew rapidly as it was
used by more and more research and higher education
institutions, leading to the formation of the World Wide Web
in the early 1990s. "The Web," says Gasser, "became the key
to unlocking the doors to all the information on the
Internet. And it doesn't matter if that key opens a door to
a Paris museum computer or to a Russian fifth grade
computer; if you can point and click with a mouse, you can
use the Web for information. Everything is linked to
everything else on this constantly expanding network of
information. The Web is the perfect vehicle for parents and
children to explore and learn together."
|