“Feeling Seen”: How One Physiology Professor Shines a Light on LGBTQ+ Heart Health
“Feeling Seen”: How One Physiology Professor Shines a Light on LGBTQ+ Heart Health
BU researcher Jesse Moreira works to improve education and representation of marginalized groups
When Jesse Moreira started teaching their first cardiovascular physiology class to a large group of premedical students at Boston University, the clinical assistant professor soon noticed a pattern.
“I’m very vocal and open with my identities in the classroom,” says Moreira (Sargent’18,’21), who teaches at the College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College and is nonbinary. Queer-identifying students started coming to Moreira during office hours, sharing sentiments like, “Thank you for being authentic. It helped me feel more comfortable in the classroom space,” Moreira says.
This got Moreira thinking—how might future clinicians, researchers, and medical professionals be better trained to serve LGBTQ+ identifying patients? With research expertise in cardiovascular systems and disease, Moreira educates students on the burden of heart disease on historically marginalized communities and the full spectrum of the cardiovascular system. By increasing representation in the classroom, and enhancing students’ understanding of how chronic stress from marginalization impacts heart health, Moreira works to improve patient care.
There are well-documented disparities in cardiovascular health for LGBTQ+ identifying individuals, says Moreira, as well as in other historically marginalized groups who experience oppression, racism, and discrimination. For example, transgender people face a higher risk of heart attacks, and bisexual people have higher rates of hypertension than heterosexual people. This is because experiencing marginalization, whether at the institutional or interpersonal level, activates a psychological distress pathway.
“When you’re constantly in a state of fight or flight, that’s going to elevate blood pressure, which is a strong independent predictor of heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease, as well as coping behaviors like tobacco use,” Moreira says. “A person feeling marginalized by a healthcare professional or clinician who then avoids seeking care compounds those stressors and results in terrible disease rates.”
Most of the literature about health inequities of LGBTQ+ people is from the past decade, Moreira says, largely due to the rise in Americans identifying as queer. Yet, LGBTQ+ populations are still largely left out of STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine) research and education. Moreira coauthored a paper in the American Journal of Physiology on the lack of inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual, two spirit, gender nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people in STEMM, and action steps to retain scientists in physiology. The authors point out that LGBTQ+ scientists and others in STEMM fields experience more harassment during their careers and have higher drop-out rates than their cisgender-heterosexual peers, likely due to lacking a sense of belonging in the field.
To address these problems, Moreira uses the classroom as a first step. Last fall, while teaching a cardiovascular pathophysiology class of about 100, Moreira conducted a study that measured how a lecture focused on disparities in marginalized communities impacted students. Their goal was not only to better educate premed students on the unique needs of historically marginalized communities, but also to inspire them to think of solutions.
“When we train more inclusive-minded scientists and clinicians, we reduce implicit bias that they hold, and possibly that will translate as better outcomes for their patients one day or better designed clinical trials,” Moreira says.
When we train more inclusive-minded scientists and clinicians, we reduce implicit bias that they hold, and possibly that will translate as better outcomes for their patients one day or better designed clinical trials.
In the lecture, Moreira goes over the minority stress theory—which describes how LGBTQ+ people systematically experience psychological distress—as well as basic cardiovascular science to demonstrate how stress pathways are activated from the brain to the heart. The class then works through case studies that help them see example patients who might have intersecting marginalized identities.
Moreira concludes the lesson with a question: What’s something that you can do that costs little to nothing to make a difference? Students share ideas like community-organized spaces where LGBTQ+ people can come get their blood pressure taken and other safe places for queer clinicians to provide peer-to-peer education. “I needed them to see that they currently possess the ability to be effective in working with these populations,” Moreira says. “You don’t have to wait until you’re an MD to do public health outreach.”
Moreira surveyed half the students to measure how the lecture impacted them and found significant improvement in both subjective and objective understanding related to health inequities in cardiovascular health for LGBTQ+ populations and BIPOC (Black, indigenous, and people of color) communities. Students were able to remember and understand the information, providing a strong foundation for learning more as they continue through school.
Moreira plans to repeat the study in fall 2023 to see if it remains effective. Eventually, they want to reach medical students through targeted lectures, class discussions, and reflection activities that involve designing new public health interventions.
“My big overarching goal is to work with the American Physiological Society to start publishing standardized curricula guidelines for the teaching of physiology and marginalized communities,” Moreira says.
On the final exam for the course, Moreira asked students about their biggest takeaway from the class. After 24 lectures covering topics from hypertension to heart failure—and just one focused on marginalized communities—almost every person wrote about marginalized communities and their unique needs. “It shows that the students were impacted by this,” Moreira says. “One student wrote, ‘Thank you so much for even talking about this. It feels so different to be represented in front of a classroom. I feel seen.’”
Comments & Discussion
Boston University moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (EST) and can only accept comments written in English. Statistics or facts must include a citation or a link to the citation.