TRoL

Home

Citizenship

Current

FAQ

Archive

About

Masthead

Contact

Contributors


Search TRoL:  
 

Of French Intellectuals and Anti-Americanism

Home > No. 11 > Arias

Just why is it that a century after the Dreyfus case French intellectuals have systematically chosen to align themselves with the enemies of freedom? The question has been raised again in response to hyperterrorism and September 11. (. . .) Not three days had gone by since the World Trade Center disaster than the far-flung corners of the world reverberated to a second series of explosions—this time of intellectual anti-Americanism. Nothing new about that. I once thought it was sufficient to describe anti-Americanism as socialism for idiots, now I see I was wrong. I had thought my definition covered much of the field, but in fact it was too restrictive. It had not included the grievances caused by sheer frustration.

After the collapse of Marxism—;that old siren song that so moved the hearts of intellectuals for a whole century—anti-Americanism became the one refuge for the near-totality of the educated. It was the obverse side of all those lost hopes and, who knows? the threshold beyond which lay fresh illusions.

Wretched and obscene. Wretchedness of the single cause. Wretchedness of the "antis." Wretchedness of anti-ism. One might have thought that faced with the barbarity of the deed and the sufferings of America the big bass drum of anti-Americanism might have been muffled. Especially when you consider that for people who think of themselves as children of the Enlightenment, Islamic fanaticism offered no great attraction. Wrong again. The contrary happened. The sorrows of America filled the hearts of the chattering classes with glee. (. . .) Bloody Americans! To have that happen to them, mighty must have been their sins. Where the man in the street simply danced on the ruins, the intellectual, a man equipped with knowledge, introduced a rule of proportionality. A refined thinker, he thought America's punishment was in exact proportion to her deeds. Rather than arousing pity, this urban cataclysm became an accusation.

This is an old story, as ancient as the Old Testament. When the God-fearing and rich Job is struck down by God, his friends (who of course all wish him well) gather round his bedside! "There's something not quite right with your story, Job! Look deep in your heart, brother! Search. Tell the truth. If God punishes you, it is because you have sinned greatly." Fine people, each and every one of them!

Perhaps you think I'm exaggerating? Embroidering? Allegorizing? I refer you to the sprawling rhapsodies published in le Monde by the likes of Arundhati Roy, the Indian novelist, by Jean Baudrillard, an illustrious French historian, and by John le Carré, unidentified. Or to the manifesto signed by 113 French intellectuals from the extreme Left, among them Pierre Vidal-Naquet. All of them go on about it endlessly: America is all-powerful, hence America is all-guilty, and bin Laden is the scourge of the Lord. Which of course is exactly what that great white spook with the fevered eyes and prophet's beard, his white tunic of innocence so media-friendly, says.


This is an excerpt. To read the rest, please continue your travels in the Republic by purchasing No. 11, December 2001.

Jacques Julliard's bio is forthcoming.



©2007 News from the Republic of Letters All rights reserved.

 

Order Back Issues Archives