This article is a perfect example to show why some western media has been challenged. The first comment actually IS MUCH more objective than the article itself and it covers most of the important points regarding the issue about baised journalism. The simple fact is that CNN and some other western media DID lie on the issue of Tibet riot. So before you (the editor) become intuitively defensive when someone points that out, take some time to go through anti-cnn.com, as well as CNN and make your own judgement. There is a reason why western media is questioned by the chinese people. I think that the only thing this article will do is to aggitate the conflict here. I mean, who would believe that deliberately picking out some internet mob's offensive words is trying the solve the problem. There are a lot more reasonable and calm thoughts from the chinese people like some comments below and this article doesn't care to mention one word of them. Not only that, the article doesn't care to investigate a little bit about whether the acusation to the CNN is true or false. This is not objective, on the contrary, this is the very reason why some western media has been challenged.